1. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T Modeling Suspended Solids Jason Hamel November 11, 2004

2. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T Quick Review Building an array of test cases examining the effect of TSS on water leaving radiance/reflectBuilding an array of test cases examining the effect of TSS on water leaving radiance/reflect 5 constituents:5 constituents: –Albite, calcite, kaolinite, opal, quartz –Calcite currently using ordinary, extraordinary and spectral ri Jungian distributionJungian distribution –2*-5 Junge distributions with size ranges of 0.2-60, 0.2-90, 0.2- 125, and 10-60 microns Gaussian distributionGaussian distribution –25 micron mean with 25 micron standard deviation Differing concentrations of CHL, TSS, CDOMDiffering concentrations of CHL, TSS, CDOM –Currently have results for 0/10/0, and 6/10/2 cases

3. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T 0.0001 Imaginary RI Cases

4. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T 0.0001 Imaginary RI cases

5. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T 0.001 Imaginary RI Cases

6. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T Different Constituents, Same Size Distribution

7. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T Different Constituents, Same Size Distribution

8. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T Changing Size, Same Junge

9. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T Changing Junge, Same Size

10. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T Different RI’s and Concentrations

11. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T Gaussian Distributions

12. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T Small Particles Removed

13. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T Size Distribution

14. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T Size Distribution

15. Digital Imaging and Remote Sensing Laboratory R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T R.I.TR.I.TR.I.TR.I.T Conclusions so far Water leaving reflectance seems well behaved when TSS is dominated by small particlesWater leaving reflectance seems well behaved when TSS is dominated by small particles Variation just starting with 2 JungeVariation just starting with 2 Junge Variation quite apparent with GaussianVariation quite apparent with Gaussian Concentration has a large effectConcentration has a large effect Composition can have an effectComposition can have an effect Particle Size Distribution can have an effectParticle Size Distribution can have an effect