Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Liquid Penetrant Inspection

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Liquid Penetrant Inspection"— Presentation transcript:

1 Liquid Penetrant Inspection

2 Liquid Penetrant Inspection
Dye Penetrant Inspection(DPI) Penetrant Flaw Detection (PFD) Penetrant Testing (PT) Surface inspection method Applicable to all non-porous, non-absorbing materials

3 6 Steps in Penetrant flaw detection
Surface preparation Penetrant application Removal of excess penetrant Application of developer Inspection Post cleaning and protection

4 1. Surface Preparation Scale Oils and Greases Physical Methods
Chemical Methods Scale Slag Corrosion products Oils and Greases Paints

5 Chemical Methods Vapour Degreasing Hot Solvent Degreasing
Cold solvent Degreasing Solvent materials with Emulsifiers Acid / Alkaline Cleaning Steam cleaning Paint Removal

6 2. Penetrant Application
Penetrating fluid applied to component and drawn into defect by capillary action

7 Penetrant Application Critical factors
Penetration / Dwell time Component Temperature

8 Principle : Capillary Action
Interaction of adhesive and cohesive forces

9 Principle : Capillary Action
Interaction of adhesive and cohesive forces

10 Penetrant Properties Good Wetting Ability High Surface Tension
Viscosity

11 Wetting Ability Liquids having good wetting ability have a low contact angle. Liquids having a contact angle of 90º or less will act as penetrants. Contact angle is strongly affected by surface cleanliness.

12 Contact Angle Contact Angle Liquid SOLID

13 Contact Angle LOW HIGH

14 Surface Tension HIGH LOW

15 Surface Tension Strongly affected by contamination

16 Viscosity Viscosity is a measure of internal friction
It affects the rate at which a liquid flows Viscosity has a strong effect on the time taken for capillary action to work A high viscosity penetrant will require a longer contact time and a longer development time A low viscosity penetrant may drain too quickly from vertical or overhead surfaces

17 Types of Penetrant Colour Contrast Fluorescent
All other factors being equal, fluorescent penetrants provide the best sensitivity Each of the above may be water washable, solvent removable or post-emulsifiable (in order of increasing sensitivity)

18 C O N T R A S T C O N T R A S T C O N T R A S T C O N T R A S T

19

20 2. Penetrant Application
Preceded by a visual inspection Spraying Methods Brushing Immersion

21 Penetrant application
Electrostatic spraying Special Methods Thixotropic penetrants

22 3. Removal of Excess Penetrant
Penetrating fluid applied to component and drawn into defect by capillary action Penetrating fluid removed from component surface (but not from defect)

23 Removal of Excess Penetrant
Water washable Solvent Removable Post Emulsifiable Penetrants are formulated for removal by one or sometimes more than one of the above.

24 Removal of Excess Penetrant
Water Washable Penetrant Minimise mechanical action Pressure as low as possible Spray wash Temperature less than 50ºC

25 Water Washable Penetrant
ADVANTAGES Usable on rough surfaces Suitable for batch testing Cheaper than other methods DISADVANTAGES Susceptible to over washing Least sensitive method Requirement for a water source

26 Post Emulsifiable Penetrant
Stages Immerse component in penetrant Immerse component in emulsifier Emulsifier diffuses into the penetrant making it water washable Water wash removes excess penetrant / emulsifier Penetrant in defects left unaffected

27 Removal of Excess Penetrant
Hydrophilic 2 Post emulsification systems Lipophilic Contact time critical Determined by experimentation

28 Post emulsifiable ADVANTAGES Maximum penetrating ability
Greater control over penetrant removal DISADVANTAGES Not suited to rough surfaces More expensive More time consuming

29 Removal of Excess Penetrant
Solvent Removable Clean off the excess with a lint free cloth. Wipe with a solvent dampened rag. Thou shalt not spray the cleaner directly onto the item under test.

30 Solvent Removable ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Portability
No water supply needed DISADVANTAGES Not suited to batch testing Requires hand wiping so time consuming More expensive than water washable Potentially hazardous chemicals

31 Hot air recirculating oven (max 80ºC)
Drying Hot air recirculating oven (max 80ºC) Forced warm air Dry clean compressed air Component temperature shall not exceed 50ºC

32 4. Development Penetrating fluid applied to component and drawn into defect by capillary action Developer applied to surface

33 Developer Properties Absorptive Fine texture
Able to mask out background colour Evenly and easily applicable Light and even coat Non-fluorescing Easily wetted Contrasting colour Easily removed Non-toxic and Non-irritant

34 Developer action Penetrating fluid applied to component and drawn into defect by capillary action Developer applied to surface Penetrant drawn back out of the defect by reverse capillary action

35 Developer action Capillary Action - Increases the size of an indication far beyond the actual defect size; increases the “thickness” of an indication, thereby increasing it’s colour brilliance. Light scattering - Aids the conversion of UVA to visible light when using fluorescent systems; reduces background glare when using visible systems. Solvent Action - Solvent combines with penetrant, reducing penetrant viscosity, thereby inducing a more rapid, more efficient bleed-out.

36 Light Scattering I0 If If If If

37 No Developer With Developer

38 No Developer With Developer

39 Development Dry powder Aqueous liquid Component must be dry
Applied by Dipping Blowing Dust storm cabinet Aqueous liquid Dry after application Applied by Immersion Spraying Brushing Non-Aqueous liquid Applied by Aerosol

40 Dry powder developer ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES Easy to handle
No hazardous vapours Easy to remove DISADVANTAGES Difficult to see if properly applied Fine powders can be hazardous Does not offer the best degree of colour contrast

41 Aqueous Developer Solutions

42 Aqueous Developer Solutions Suspensions

43 Aqueous Developer ADVANTAGES No vapours or dust
Cheaper than non-aqueous DISADVANTAGES Difficult to apply evenly Requires drying after application

44 Non-Aqueous Developer
ADVANTAGES Most sensitive Usable with fluorescent or colour contrast DISADVANTAGES Hazardous solvents Higher cost Need to be correctly applied

45 Developer Sensitivity
Dry powder % Aqueous solution % Aqueous suspension % Non-Aqueous %

46 System Classification
Type of penetrant Method of penetrant removal Type of developer

47 System classification
DEVELOPERS Dry powder Aqueous Non-Aqueous PENETRANT Colour contrast Fluorescent Dual REMOVAL Water washable Solvent Post emulsifiable

48 5. Inspection Indications viewed as soon as practicable after developer application with final assessment taking place after a minimum development time has elapsed.

49 30 Seconds 1 Minute 15 Minutes

50 5. Inspection Lighting levels critical Colour Contrast
White light above 500 lux Fluorescent White light below 20 lux UV-A above 1000µW / cm2

51 5. Inspection Fluorescent Allow 15 minutes lamp warm-up
Allow 5 minutes dark adaptation Do not wear photo-chromatic spectacles

52 6. Post Cleaning DPI residues are required to be removed because
They may be harmful to the component or They may impair subsequent processing

53 Advantages of DPI Applicable to all non-porous materials
Able to test large parts with a portable kit Batch testing Applicable to small parts with complex geometry Simple,cheap, easy to interpret Good sensitivity Training requirements typically less than for other NDT methods.

54 Disadvantages of DPI Will only detect defects open to the surface
Careful surface preparation required Not applicable to porous materials Temperature dependent Cannot retest indefinitely Compatibility of chemicals

55 Penetrant Systems PENETRANT Colour contrast Fluorescent Dual REMOVAL
Solvent Water washable Post emulsifiable DEVELOPERS Dry powder Aqueous Non-Aqueous

56 Selection of System Nature of discontinuities (size and type)
Geometry and intricacy Surface condition Component material and application Size and position Equipment and expertise available Cost Number of components to be tested

57 Control Checks Tank levels Overall system performance

58 Overall System Performance
Chromium plated cracked test panel Cracked test piece Quench cracked aluminium alloy block

59 Control Checks Tank levels Overall system performance
Rinse water temperature Oven temperature Equipment cleanliness Airline filters UV-A filters

60 Control Checks UV-A / visible light levels
Fluorescent / colour intensity Suppliers check Hydrophilic remover dilution Developer Meter / gauge calibrations

61 Control Checks - Frequency
Tank levels Overall system performance Rinse water temperature Oven temperature Equipment cleanliness Airline filters UV-A filters UV-A / visible light levels Daily Weekly Monthly

62 Control Checks - Frequency
Fluorescent / colour intensity Suppliers check Hydrophilic remover dilution Developer Meter / gauge calibrations Monthly Annual when fresh Daily

63 UV(A)

64 Electromagnetic Spectrum
X-rays & Gamma Electric Waves Microwaves Ultra violet Infra red TV Light cm Wavelength

65 Electromagnetic Spectrum
A Damaged Black Light Emits UV-C UV-B UV-A ULTRAVIOLET VISIBLE LIGHT LIGHT

66 Fluorescence UV-A Source : Mercury vapour arc lamp + Filter
Precautions Avoid looking directly at the lamp Do not use if filter is cracked, damaged or incorrectly fitted

67 Fluorescence and the Electromagnetic Spectrum
Absorbs Emits Dual ULTRAVIOLET VISIBLE LIGHT LIGHT

68 Fluorescent v Colour Contrast
Fluorescent more sensitive Less operator fatigue with fluorescent More difficulty in monitoring fluorescent penetrant removal Fluorescence may degrade under UV(A), when exposed to acid and high temperatures


Download ppt "Liquid Penetrant Inspection"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google