1. Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund) Pan-Baltic stakeholders’ dialogue on MSP: Synthesis report Anda Ruskule, BEF Berlin, 28 April, 2014 from PartiSEApate single-sector workshops held in 2013

2. series of pan-Baltic sectoral workshops 2013: single-secotr workshops Aquaculture, 15-16 April, Gdansk Climate change, 13-14 May, Ystad Research, 28-29 May, Klaipeda Underwater Cultural heritage, 3-4 June, Riga Data network building, 15-16 Oct., Hamburg Shipping/ports, 24 Oct., Brussels Nature/ Environment, 31 Oct. - 1 Nov., Riga Offshore wind energy, 12-13 Nov., Vilnius Fisheries, 14 Nov., Vilnius 2014: cross-sectoral debate, 10 April, 2014 in Habmurg: workshop on “Resolving of Sea Use Conflicts in the Baltic Sea and Opportunities provided by a transnational MSP Perspective” to discuss synergies and conflicts develop priorities and solutions for future MSPs and related governance processes.

3. Syntesis report Content of report: Introduction 1. Characteristics of sectors and their expectations and conditions towards MSP 1.1. Sea use sectors: aquaculture, shipping, offshore wind energy and fisheries 1.2. Sectors setting conditions for MSP 1.3. Sectors supporting MSP process 2. Towards pan-Baltic stakeholders dialogue stakeholders’: needs for cross- sector consultations, expectations and constrains 2.1. Interest of sectors in pan-Baltic stakeholders dialogue on MSP 2.2. Identified needs for cross-sectoral discussions on national and trans-national level 2.3. Identified conflicts and synergies between maritime space users 2.4. Solutions for conflict resolution 3. Overall conclusions form the series of the single-sector workshops 4. Lessons learned

4. Syntesis report Interest of sectors in pan-Baltic stakeholders dialogue on MSP insufficient dialogue and co-ordination of sea uses at pan-Baltic scale even within the sectors. sectors are lacking information and understanding of MSP benefits for being involved in MSP are realised limited human and financial resources as the main constrains for participation in pan-Baltic stakeholder’s dialogue insolvent of existing international platforms

5. Syntesis report Identified needs for cross-sectoral discussions on national and trans-national level Sectors mostly wished to be consulted 1.Nature/Environment; 2.Research; 3.Climate change; 4.Fishery; 5.Offshore energy; 6.Data networks. All sectors interested in transnational consultation with their colleagues from the same sector

6. Syntesis report Identified needs for cross-sectoral discussions on national and trans- national level Workshop Sector Aqua- culture Climate change Data Networks Fishery Nature/ Environment Offshore Energy Research Shipping/ Ports UCH Aquaculture2.21.01.31.4 0.3 0.70.6 Climate change1.82.21.61.82.12.22.0 1.4 Data network2.01.42.51.51.92.51.51.31.9 Nature/ Environment2.51.72.12.22.62.22.12.01.8 Fishery2.11.42.12.52.11.02.01.31.4 Mineral extraction1.30.31.31.21.50.60.71.20.9 Oil extraction1.20.11.71.31.81.41.61.50.9 Offshore Energy2.01.22.11.92.12.31.42.21.5 Research2.21.51.81.92.42.52.31.31.7 Shipping1.71.22.01.71.81.41.62.01.1 Tourism1.1 1.20.90.81.30.91.31.5 Underwater heritage1.20.81.20.91.30.5 0.71.9

7. Researchers & nature conservation, environmental sector Aquaculture: Issues to be consulted with other sectors Dialogue need withTopics for dialogue Aquaculture Allocation of sites based on natural conditions; A need for common regulation on environmental standards; impacts on marine environment due to growing spatial demand Shipping/ports Impacts on air quality, noise, marine biodiversity; UCH Impacts of environmental conditions and invasive species (shipworm) on UCH artefacts Synergies in designation of protected areas for protection natural and UCH assets

8. Researchers – nature conservation experts – planners – data people: Findings from sectoral workshops and cross sectoral interests Dialogue betweenTopics for dialogue Researchers - MSP – sea users Scenario based impact assessments Stakeholder involvement/consultation methods for sea use planning and development of bio-economic models Ecosystem service concept as tool to assess conflicts, benefits and trade-offs between different uses Researchers – nature/envionmental sector – MSP planners Application of MSP for achievement of GES (addressing of MSFD descriptors in MSP) Assessing ecological effects of MPA designation and management, appropriate size of MPAs, coherence of MPA network Researchers-planners – data people Providing data/developing of existing data basis/systems (e.g. MSFD data basis to be linked with MSP) Decentralised data systems to be coordinated at international level

9. Climate change (researchers & MSP planners): Findings from sectoral workshops and cross sectoral interests Dialogue betweenTopics for dialogue coastal municipalities land based planners Holistic, multifunctional perspective + adaptive approach to planning of coastal areas Land-sea integration in the planning process Elaboration of new (adaptive) planning instruments, which take into account CC impacts policy makers & society Raising averseness on impacts of CC (visualisations, maps) Adaptation needs, strategic approaches Integration of wide economic sectors Adaptation of fisheries and aquaculture management strategies Changes in recreation/tourism patterns

10. Aquaculture: Findings from sectoral workshops and cross sectoral interests Dialogue need withTopics for dialogue Fisheries Allocation of space potentials for use of fisheries infrastructure Tourism Allocation of space (sailing, other recreational activities, SPA centres) Synergies: tourism attraction, local food production Offshore wind energy Possibilities/limitations for combined uses

11. Sipping and ports: Findings from sectoral workshops and cross sectoral interests Dialogue need withTopics for dialogue Pipeline constructors Deepening of fairways Transport market players Future prospects of in transportation of goods and development of shipping and related port infrastructure Land based planners and industries Port and related infrastructure development, new logistic solutions (road/rail infrastructure) Offshore wind energy Allocation of space to avoid long detours for ships and risk of collisions

12. Underwater cultural heritage: Findings from sectoral workshops and cross sectoral interests Dialogue need withTopics for dialogue All sea use sectors, impacting sea bottom Sipping Offshore industry Fisheries Investigation of potential impacts (to be part of EIA procedure); Conditions for removal of wracks or transfer to designated location Designation of UCH protection areas Tourism Legal regulation of diving activities to ensure protection of UCH and security Designation of areas not accessible for diving Designation of areas were removed wracks are stored (underwater museums) Coastal municipalities Information on UCH assets at the coast Information how to act in case of looting of UCH sites

13. Syntesis report Identified conflicts between maritime space users Most often mentioned sectors as conflicting sector with other sectors: – fishery (20%), – wind farms or offshore wind energy (19%), – aquaculture (13%) – shipping (10%) and – nature protection (10%). Mutually conflicting sectors – fishery and offshore wind energy (33 times), – offshore wind energy and shipping (18 times), – aquaculture and tourism (17 times), – offshore wind energy and nature protection (16 times).

14. Syntesis report Identified synergies between maritime space users Most often mentioned sectors with potential for synergies with other sectors: – aquaculture (18%), – offshore wind energy (18 %), – fishery (14 %) – tourism (12%). Mutually synergies between sectors – offshore wind energy and fishery (43 times), – fishery and aquaculture (17 times), – fishery and tourism (16 times).

15. Syntesis report Thank you!