1. Top Ten List Nov. 22, 2010

2.  320 students  Daycare and Preschool  Double section building  Three Levels of Special Education  1.5 Reading Specialists, inc. Reading Recovery  Not a Title I building due to Free and Reduced percentage

3.  All students who are not proficient on ITBS will have Level A accommodations in place by February of testing year.  All students who are not proficient on ITBS will have Level B accommodations (SST) in place by May 1 st of testing year.  If/then document implemented  Mrs. Kelly Kelley oversees and organizes

4.  As of 11-15-10, we have 26 students on SST  1 student has both reading and math  1 student has SST for advancement  2 students have SST for behavior  Total of seven teams of four teachers  Referring teacher is “case manager”  One meeting time per month built in to schedule  Teams create specific & measurable goals for students

5.  Examples MATH: Student will score 70% or higher on assessed assignments and tests for 3 consecutive chapters READING: Student will read 25 wpm on a 2nd grade reading probe with 90% accuracy BEHAVIOR: Student will receive 3 or fewer tallies per week for 3 consecutive weeks

6.  Familiarity with SST process has helped us to easily transition to Data Teams…  Like an SST for your entire class or grade level  Data Team document replaces Team Feedback Sheet which was formerly submitted  Most teams are starting with spelling or math goal due to “black and white” content

7.  Goal: The percentage of ______ students who are proficient in ______ will increase from _____ to _____ as measured by _____ administered on _____. Example  The percentage of 1 st grade students who are proficient in ending consonant sounds will increase from 87% to 95% by Nov. 30 th as measured by the October common assessment, page 2.

8.  “Form” the summative assessments  Regular or gradual assessments  Used to guide instruction  Local assessments  Anecdotal information  Helps to group students  Helps to identify students who need remedial help  Helps to identify students who need enrichment

9. READINGMATH Percent Proficient Grade 392.6% Grade 497.2% Grade 597.1% Grade 689.6% Percent Proficient Grade 392.8% Grade 499.9% Grade 5100% Grade 6100% ITBS, Based on National Percentile Rank Fall 2009

10.  Guided Reading – all grade levels  Small group instruction  Literature Circles – grades 3-6  Alignment with Comprehension Strategies  Shared Reading – large group instruction  Working With Words  Literature Work Stations / Centers  The Daily Five  The CAFÉ Book

11.  StrategyLit Circle Role  ConnectionsClever Connector  VisualizingVivid Visualizer  InferringIncredible Inferrer  QuestioningQualified Questioner  Determining Magnificent Mapper Importance  SynthesizingSystematic Summarizer

12.  Whew!  Everyday Math – new adoption  Struggles and Challenges  “I do think that our kids are learning WAAAY more than before.”  Still working on consistency  Implementing with fidelity  Parents (and students) have been very patient!

13.  Eight years with current text book  Added VAST kits from AEA  Hands-on prepared kits  1 st Balance and Motion  2 nd Habitats  3 rd Water  4 th Structures of Life  5 th Variables  6 th Mixtures and Solutions

14.  Three different levels  Level I – Resource  Mrs. Kendra Yaddof  Level II – Self-Contained with Integration  Mrs. Stephanie Dougherty  Level III – Including students with autism  Mrs. Bridget Robbins  ABA and ABLLS

15.  New Mac Lab, replaces 8 year old lab  Wireless Lab w/22 lap tops  Promethean Boards in grades 4-6, and Library  Ongoing training  Mrs. N. Youngbauer  TAG, Future Problem Solving, Battle of the Books, Spelling Bee, AS Website, MA program

16.  Very dedicated and committed staff