1. Expert group on delegated and implementing acts of 3 October 2013 Models of Joint Action Plans (Art 95 CPR) 2 nd meeting

2. 2 Purpose of the presentation Present the main changes / "no changes" in the model of implementing act setting out a model of format for the Joint Action Plan

3. Model for a format of Joint Action Plan Comments & proposals sent by 5 MSs (CZ, EE, HU, LT, PL) - Most of them taken into account … with the exception of audit of public procurement - clarifications in the Q&A

4. Guidance part - mainly wording issues - details added on information of the COM on future JAPs (3 months / informal) - bodies implementing the JAP - approval of the JAP application by MA(s) - date of submission of JAPs - more details on intervention logic - explanation of financial flexibility - audit of public procurement: procedures but not the invoices - eligible advances - clarification on the criteria to assess amendment of a JAP and on the procedure

5. B – Contact details -> Reference to MAs approval

6. C- Analysis of development needs and objectives - better complementarity between C3 ("IP/SO supported by the JAP) and C4 (how the JAP will contribute to the SO of the IP) - Addition of a table on contribution to the performance framework

7. D – Framework of the JAP - definition of projects / types of projects (sets of similar activities with the same indicators) - mitigation measures against impact of external factors? - details added on the representation of the intervention logic

8. E- Geographic coverage and target group(s) - formal improvements F- Expected implementation period - deletion of detail of successive steps

9. H- Implementing provisions - Info on key partners (where appropriate) - clarifications on administrative and financial management capacity, on information on financial corrections (10 yrs, >10 kEUR) - deletion of the arrangements of the beneficiary to steer the JAP (overlap)

10. J- Financial arrangements (1) - financial flexibility: more detailed + new box - euro conversion - financial tables simplified ( for financing plan)

11. Annex on indicators used to reimburse the outputs and results - formal changes

12. Financial flexibility (1) 10% of allocations for indicators of the same type (output / result). No increase of the LS or UC, no transfer between outputs & results, no change of milestones Decision: Output 1: 100 /10 people trained (UC 10/pt) Output 2: 100 / 100 people followed up (UC 1/pf) Result 1: 100 /10 people in employment after 3 months (UC 10/pe) Final: 90 for 9 people trained, 105 (+5%) for 105 people followed up (Max 110/110) 100 (capped) for 11 people in employment after 3 months.

13. Financial flexibility (2) Indicators of the same "substance" Ex: UC = child occupying a place in a childcare service - with an attendance rate > 70% = 100 - with an attendance rate > 30%, <70% = 50 - with an attendance rate < 30% = 0

14. Audit issues -Audit of public procurement : focus on procedures, no audit of the amounts paid. -Necessary to keep this possibility = respect of applicable law can be verified

15. Many thanks for your attention Questions? Laurent SENS laurent.sens@ec.europa.eu