1. Toxics Use Reduction Institute Cleaning Alternatives Assessment Process from the Surface Solutions Laboratory

2. What Has SSL Done As a technical assistance provider for over 10 year SSL has helped hundreds of companies find safer alternatives to hazardous cleaning solvents. The implementation rate for clients of the lab is three times higher than the national average for technical assistant providers. Over one-third of the companies fully adopt the lab’s recommendations.

3. Three Types of Cleaning Parts Cleaning –Cleaning parts during and after manufacturing in metal working or tooling industries –Gross Cleaning Applications Precision Cleaning –Cleaning parts during and after manufacturing in Semi Conductor and Medical Sectors –Critical Cleaning Applications Facility Cleaning –Janitorial or housekeeping chores in public/private institutions such as schools or hospitals –Institutional Cleaning Applications

4. Technical Assistance The goal of the lab is to assist industry in the search for safer cleaning processes –By developing and promoting safer alternatives to hazardous solvents

5. Alternative Selection Process is challenging –Thousands of products –Different information from different vendors –What is right for some may not work for you Need for an easier selection method –Independent analysis of products –Objective operating conditions –Process specific final evaluations

6. Review Current System Contacted by company with cleaning related issue Gather background information on process –SSL Test Request form Material of parts to be cleaned Contaminants Current Solvent –Other alternatives already tested Available Equipment Operating conditions (time, temp, conc.)

7. Review Current System Site visit –Complete Test Request form –Gather samples and MSDS Contaminants Current Solvent Dirty Parts –Identify possible adjustments to process

8. SSL Test Request Form

9. Important Information PROCESS DESCRIPTIONS What is the purpose of cleaning (i.e., desired product specifications)? _________________________________________ _________________________________________ __________________________________ What are the problems with present cleaning system? _________________________________________ _________________________________________ __________________________________

10. What Are You Cleaning DESCRIBE THE PART/PRODUCT TO BE CLEANED What is the part/product used for? Material(s) of construction Surface Type –Rough or Smooth –Hard or Soft Geometry –Simple –Complex (contains inaccessible areas) Size & Weight –Small Medium Large –Weight: 50lb

11. How Are You Cleaning It? DESCRIBE THE CURRENT CLEANING PROCESS Contaminants to remove –Are samples of contaminants available? No Yes –Manufacturer –Product –Amount used per year (month or week) Manufacturing step immediately before cleaning Manufacturing step immediately after cleaning # parts cleaned per week (or shift, etc.) # per batch

12. How Are You Cleaning It? Equipment being used or available for use –Specify vendor, if possible: Cleaning chemicals currently being used: –Manufacturer –Product –Concentration –Vol. used in equipment –Amount Used per year (month or week) –Time –Temp Rinse Cycle –Time –Temp –Water source: DI (deionized) OR Tap Drying Cycle Method –Time –Temp

13. How Do You Determine How Clean Is Clean? After cleaning, parts are –Used Immediately OR Stored If stored, how and how long Method(s) employed for evaluating cleanliness Performance test, if any

14. Who Is Doing the Cleaning JOB DESCRIPTIONS –Job Titles in Cleaning Operation –# of Workers –Duties –Time Period (year) –Time at each job (daily)

15. What Type of Safety Is Used? CONTROL MEASURES –Do you use any control measures (hoods, splash guards, goggles, gloves, etc –What methods have you taken to control exposures within the last six months? The last year? Comments or Areas of Special Concern

16. Selection of Alternative Cleaner

17. Alternative Cleaner Step 1 Identification of a potential solvent substitute must meet important parameters –The cleaner must be assessed for its ability to remove the contaminants –Compatibility with the surfaces to be cleaned –Compatibility with equipment that will be used –The alternative should be safe for the worker and the environment

18. Find a Safer, Effective Alternative Simple Solutions Database –Used to identify safer and effective products Safety Scores –VOC, ODP, GWP, HMIS/NFPA, pH Matching Performance –Contaminant, substrate, equipment, current solvent www.cleanersolutions.org/SimpleSolutions Xyzjs5t0: jmuml F3c1wt9s: jpnet

19. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) Chemicals that evaporate easily at room temperature –The term “organic” indicates that the compounds contain carbon –VOC exposures are often associated with an odor while other times there is no odor Both can be harmful –There are thousands of different VOCs produced and used daily Acute –Eye irritation / watering –Nose irritation –Throat irritation –Headaches –Nausea / Vomiting –Dizziness –Asthma exacerbation Chronic –Cancer –Liver damage –Kidney damage –Central Nervous System damage

20. VOCs Source control –Eliminate products that have high levels of VOCs –Purchase new products that contain low or no VOCs (Environmentally Preferable Purchasing)

21. Global Warming Potential (GWPs) GWP –Used to compare the ability of different greenhouse gases to trap heat in the atmosphere –Based on Heat-absorbing ability of the gas relative to base chemical carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) Decay rate of each gas relative to CO 2

22. GWPs Some greenhouse gases occur naturally in the atmosphere –Include water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, and ozone Others result from human activities –Very powerful greenhouse gases that are generated in a variety of industrial processes, including cleaning processes

23. Ozone Depletion Potential (ODPs) Ozone layer screens out the sun’s harmful ultraviolet radiation –Small amounts of ozone are constantly being made by the action of sunlight on oxygen –At the same time, ozone is being broken down by natural processes –The total amount of ozone usually stays constant because its formation and destruction occur at about the same rate –Human activity has recently changed that natural balance

24. ODPs The ratio of the amount of ozone depletion of a chemical compared to the amount of ozone depletion of the same mass of CFC-11 Certain manufactured substances can destroy stratospheric ozone much faster than it is formed

25. Hazardous Material Information System/ National Fire Protection Association (HMIS/NFPA) HMIS –Hazard Communication standard requires employers to evaluate materials and inform employees of the hazards –Developed by comparing information on the health hazard, flammability, and physical hazard of the product to a set of criteria for each hazard category NFPA –Originally developed this set of hazard rankings for their own purposes –The rankings have proven to be very useful in the chemical industry

26. HMIS/NFPA –Health –Fire –Reactivity/Instability Lab attempts to use products with a hazard less than 3 4 = Severe Hazard 3 = Serious Hazard 2 = Moderate Hazard 1 = Slight Hazard 0 = Minimal Hazard

27. pH Readings Provides a measure on a scale from 0 to 14 of the acidity or alkalinity of a solution –= 7 neutral –<7 acidic –>7 basic Try to avoid –>11 very basic, likely to cause corrosion and/or tissue damage –<3 a strong acid

28. pH Neutral substances receive the highest Individual Indicator points Both very acidic and very basic are both avoided

29. Guidelines VOC content (g/l) 0-24Good 25-49Good 50-74Okay 75-99Okay 100-149Okay 150-199Fair 200-299Fair 300Poor >300Poor GWP Values GWP = 0Good GWP = 1 (CO2)Okay All others =Poor ODP Values ODP = 0Good All others =Poor

30. Guidelines pH 0-1.0Poor 1.1-2.4Poor 2.5-2.9Fair 3.0-4.0Okay 4.1-5.9Okay 6.0-6.4Good 6.5-7.5Good 7.6-8.9Good 9.0-9.9Okay 10-11.4Okay 11.5-11.9Fair 12-12.4Poor 12.5-12.9Poor 13-14Poor HMIS/NFPA Point Assessment H-0 F-0 R-0Good H-0 F-0 R-1, H-0 F-1 R-0Good H-1 F-1 R-0, H-2 F-0 R-0Good H-1 F-1 R-1, H-2 F-1 R-0Okay H-3 F-0 R-0Poor H-2 F-2 R-0, H-1 F-2 R-1 Okay H-1 F-3 R-0Poor H-2 F-2 R-1Fair H-1 F-3 R-1, H-2 F-3 R-0Poor H-2 F-2 R-2 Fair H-3 F-3 R-0 Poor H-3 F-3 R-1, H-3 F-3 R-2Poor

31. Example Screening Values Solvent Alkaline Aqueous Product NameIndicatorValueComments Perchloroethylene VOC1620g/lHigh GWP0Good ODP0Good HMIS H2 HMIS F0 Okay HMIS R0 pHNAGood Product NameIndicatorValueComments Brulin Formula 815 GD VOC1.1 g/lGood GWP0Good ODP0Good HMIS H1 HMIS F0Good HMIS R0 pH11.6Okay

32. Other Indicators Further analysis should be conducted to verify that the selected products are compatible with your process Determine if there are any health risks that the screening does not address

33. Other Possible Indicators Aquatic Toxicity Biodegradability Carcinogens, Mutagens or Teratogens Concentration Disposal Endocrine disruptors Eutrophication Fragrances and Dyes Life Cycle Assessment Neurotoxins/CNS Depressants Packaging Recyclability Reproductive Toxicity

34. Simple Solutions Database

37. Alternative Cleaner Step 2 Initial laboratory evaluation of alternatives –Using basic operating conditions Minimal concentration Short times Little agitation –Using coupons matching part substrate –Using supplied contaminants –Compare with current solvent (if possible)

38. Alternative Cleaner Step 3 Advanced lab evaluation of alternatives –Using client specific operating conditions Moderate concentration (if necessary) Times Appropriate agitation (match current equipment) –Using coupons matching part substrate –Using supplied contaminants –Compare with current solvent (if possible)

39. Pilot Alternative Cleaner

40. Piloting Step 1 Pilot cleaning in lab setting –Using client specific operating conditions –Using client supplied parts –Compare with current solvent (if possible) –Send/bring parts to client for assessment

41. Piloting Step 2 Perform comparison with old system –Cost of product –Bath life –Energy usage –Water usage –Time changes –Worker training –Worker safety –Regulations

42. Piloting Step 3 Pilot testing at facility –Using best alternative cleaning products –Using operating conditions from lab piloting Modify conditions if necessary –Set up piloting off-line from current system Compare pilot cleaned parts with current system for parts from the same manufacturing lot Get end user input for performance (if applicable)

43. Adoption of New Process

44. Adoption Step 1 Evaluate parts cleaned with new system –Compare with results from old system (QA/QC) –Get customer response to parts cleaned with new process –Determine acceptability of results

45. Adoption Step 2 Full scale production –Re-evaluate system after extended usage