1. 1 Marie-Claude L'Homme Patrick Leroyer Benoit Robichaud Observatoire de linguistique Sens-Texte (OLST) Département de linguistique et de traduction Université de Montréal Centlex Aarhus School of Business Aarhus University Advanced Encoding for Multilingual Access in a Terminological Data Base A Matter of Balance

2. 2 Outline Objectives  Access to translations of specialized collocations encoded in a terminological database The terminological database: The DiCoInfo  Current contents and structure  Current functionalities and limitations for translation needs A model for accessing specialized collocations  The linguistic apparatus  The technical apparatus Challenges and future work L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

3. 3 Objectives Implementing new translation functionalities in an existing terminological database:  Direct access to data for L1-L2 translation: what is the translation of a specific collocation?  Esp. providing users access to translations of collocations: send a file as an attachment -> envoyer, transmettre un fichier en pièce jointe  Define a method that allows for the enrichment of the database without having to translate collocations one by one  Access functionalities should not presuppose technical linguistic knowledge from the user L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

4. 4 The DiCoInfo: a dynamic, polyfunctional tool (1): an overview L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin An XML database containing terms related to the fields of computing and the Internet Approx. 1,000 entries in French and 400 in English Based mainly on the lexical framework of Explanatory Combinatorial Lexicology (ECL, Mel’cuk et al. 1984-1999; 1995) Descriptions based on corpora (2 million words in French; 1 million words in English)

5. 5 The DiCoInfo: a dynamic, polyfunctional tool (2): the term record L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

6. 6 The DiCoInfo: a dynamic, polyfunctional tool (3): the user interface Search Language L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin Search Mode Search Precision

7. 7 The DiCoInfo: a dynamic, polyfunctional tool (4): narrowing searches L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin Words starting with the string program (14)Terms starting with the word program (6)

8. 8 The DiCoInfo as a translation aid: current functionalities For L1-L2 translation  L1 reception phase:  Comprehensive coverage of the domain  Headwords and definitions  Access to lists of semantically related items  L2 production phase:  Presentation of grammatical data  Actancial structures and linguistic forms of actants  Contexts for pragmatic and stylistic information (professional discourse)  L1 > L2 translation phase:  Equivalents to the headwords  Equivalents to collocations L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

9. One DicoInfo database = one dictionary 9 Dicoinfo database Lexicographic team Dictionary Interface L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

10. One DicoInfo database = several dictionaries 10 Dicoinfo database Lexicographic team Search engine L1 & L2 Production Dictionary L1<>L2 Translation Dictionary LSP-learning Dictionary Other dictionary applications L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

11. 11 The DiCoInfo as a translation tool: potential improvements Extensive lists of collocations ◦ Comprehensiveness leads to lists of collocations that are not discriminated according to specific situations or user needs  E.g. file has a long list of collocates (e.g., create, delete, compress. generate, use, edit a file, etc.); its French equivalent fichier has more than 100 collocates Limited multilingual assistance Established at the level of headwords, but not at the level of lexical relationships (this includes collocations)  E.g. there is a formal link between attachment and pièce jointe, but not between send something as an attachment and envoyer qqch. en pièce jointe For L2 production phase, the translator needs direct access to translations of collocations L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

12. Accessing translations of collocations: the model Two components  A linguistic apparatus based on Combinatorial Explanatory Lexicology: lexical functions (LFs)  Encodings and formalization  Explanation-based grouping  A technical apparatus based on advanced search functions  Searching for lexical relations and expressions  Displaying equivalences 12

13. 13 The linguistic apparatus (1) Lexical function (LF) encodes: 1.Syntactic relationship between the base and the collocate: Space bar: Verb + 1 st complement: press the ~ Verb + 1 st complement: release the ~ Verb + 2 nd complement:insert... (a space) with the ~ 2. Argument structure of the base: Space bar: ~ used by someone (arg1) to act on something (arg2) 1 st argument:press the ~ 1 st and 2 nd arguments:insert something with the ~ 3. General and abstract meaning of the collocate: Typical uses: press, release a space bar, insert something with a space bar Creation:create, define a password write, develop a program L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

14. 14 The linguistic apparatus (2) Lexical function (LF) Written: f (x) = y  f = function  x = keyword  y = value Real 1 (space bar) = press the ~ FinReal 1 (space bar) = release the ~ Labreal 12 (space bar) = insert … with the ~ L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

15. 15 The linguistic apparatus (3) L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

16. Searching the database: 16 The technical apparatus: Equivalents of collocates (1) L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin Find the term records that describe the searched term in a lexical relation Find the term records of the equivalents

17. The technical apparatus: Equivalents of collocates (2) Linking the equivalents in the interface: 17 L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin ?

18. 18 The technical apparatus: Equivalents of collocations (1) L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin Find the term records in which: (i) a first word appears as the headword (ii) a second word appears as a collocate Find the equivalent term records

19. The technical apparatus: Equivalents of collocations (2) 19 Linking the equivalents in the interface: L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

20. The technical apparatus: Side effects 20 L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

21. Challenges (1) Different syntactic structures  Different LFs according to syntactic functions of the key word:  Real 12 :Search the Internet for information  Labreal 12 :Chercher de l’information dans Internet Split actants  partition: ~ created by user1 to act on data1 or software1  Labreal 12 1 :Save data on a partition  Labreal 12 2 :Install a program on a partition 21 L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

22. Challenges (2) 22 L’Homme – Leroyer – Robichaud / TKE 2010 Dublin

23. Concluding remarks We proposed a model to retrieve translations of collocations  That meets user needs  That is transparent (does not presuppose special linguistic or technical knowledge)  That does not require that all collocations be translated on an individual basis 23

24. 24 Future work Extension of the coverage of English terminology  adding English collocations to the database Extension to other languages, namely Spanish which is currently under development Extension to other subject fields  Ongoing project in the field of climate change Extension of search capabilities  To allow users to discover collocates based on an onomasiological search

25. Go raibh maith agat References L'Homme, M.-C. (2008) Le DiCoInfo. Méthodologie pour une nouvelle génération de dictionnaires spécialisés, Traduire 217, pp. 78-103. L’Homme, M.-C. et al. (2009). Le manuel du DiCoInfo. http://olst.ling.umontreal.ca/dicoinfo/manuel-DiCoInfo.pdf L’Homme, M.-C. and P. Leroyer (2009). Combining the semantics of collocations with situation-driven search paths in specialized dictionaries. Terminology 15(2), pp. 258- 283. Leroyer, P. (2007) Terminologie et dictionnaires: la porte des utilisateurs. In Quirion, J. : Terminologies, Approches Transdisciplinaires. Actes en ligne. Gatineau : Université du Québec en Outaouais. http://www.uqo.ca/terminologie2007/documents/Leroyer.pdf Mel’čuk, I., A. Clas and A. Polguère (1995) Introduction à la lexicologie explicative et combinatoire. Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgique): Duculot / Aupelf - UREF. Mel’čuk, I. et al. (1984-1999) Dictionnaire explicatif et combinatoire du français contemporain. Montréal: Presses de l’Université de Montréal. 25