Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Department of Construction Engineering & Management CEM 515: Project Quality Management Case study of 8-phases.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Department of Construction Engineering & Management CEM 515: Project Quality Management Case study of 8-phases."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Department of Construction Engineering & Management CEM 515: Project Quality Management Case study of 8-phases implementation HEALTH CARE FINANCES Professor Abdulaziz A. Bubshasit

2 2 Outline Introduction and case description Objective The eight step process Define Quality Issue Understand & Define the process Select Improvement Opportunities Analyze the improvement opportunity Take action Check results Implement the opportunity Monitor results Summary

3 3 Introduction and case description HEALTH CARE FACILITIES CONSISTS OF SIX OPERATIONAL DEPARTMENTS. THIS FACILITY SERVES THE CHEMICALLY DEPENDENT PATIENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES. THIS CASE STUDY FOCUSES ON QUALITY IMPROVEMENT OF FINANCIAL DATA AND INFORMATION HANDALING MANAGEMENT.

4 4 Objective To improve the Quality System in the health care facilities. To eliminate the system defects and financial losses. To set a new system and procedure Methodology : the eight steps of CDPM Improvement Methodology have been used

5 5 DEFINE THE QUALITY ISSUE UNDERSTAND AND DEFINE PROCESS SELECT IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES ANALYZE IMPROVEMENT OPPORTUNITIES TAKE ACTION CHECK RESULTS IMLEMENT IMPROVEMENT MONITOR RESULTS TOTAL CUSTOMER SATISFACTION THE EIGHT STEP PROCESS

6 6 PHASE 1: Define Quality Issue Communicate results & manage stakeholder relations Inaccurate Financial reporting FINANCIAL REPORTING DOES NOT MEET CUSTOMER NEEDS AND EXPECTATION INPUT FORM QUALITY TEAM BRAINSTORMING METHOD PROCESS OUTPUT Availability of financial data for decision making Customer Reporting system Must be meet

7 7 PHASE 2: Understand & Define the process Improve the financial report system Defined mission statement Providing info. To six operational departments Defined process Input Work flow diagrams (Identify top-level &top-down Process) Major disconnects in logical and physical data links Inadequate manual filling procedures Process logical and physical Data link manual filling procedures Output

8 8 Phase 3: Select Improvement Opportunities logical and physical Data link manual filling procedures Input Process The improvement opportunities Manual transfer of information in different format between 6 departments. Output Statistical Analysis Method Absence of physical data links between the six departments was costing $1540 a week in terms of redundant labor

9 9 Phase 4: Analyze the improvement opportunity The improvement opportunities Manual transfer of information in different format between 6 departments. Input Cause-and-effect analysis diagram Single source for data & information Financial data considered personnel data not corporate data Financial data shall be corporate not personnel data Process Output Project Objective

10 10 Phase 5: Take action Financial data shall be corporate not personnel data Input Project Objective BRINSTORMING &SELECTION TOOLS (TO CONFIRM CUSTOMER NEEDS) USER ACCEPANCE TEST QFD “HOUSE OF QUALITY” WBS DEVELOPED TO PROVIDE GRAPHIC PICTURE OF DELIVERABLE (HARDE &SOFT WARE, SCREENS, DATA BASE) New mental model of the new system designed. New operation procedure. OUTPUT

11 11 Phase 6: check results New mental model of the new system designed. New operation procedure. DATA STATISTICAL ANALYSIS THE DEVELOPED USER ACCEPTANCEPLAN IMPLEMENTED Prototype system reviewed and accepted process input Accepted design and operation procedure of the new system Project deliverable for implementation

12 12 Phase 7: Implement the improvement Accepted new system for implementation The new system is running Writing manuals and procedures Training and education process input The new system along with all required procedure, operation and maintenance manuals and training guide. Output

13 13 Phase 8: Monitor results New system improvement opportunities operational new system meeting customer needs INPUT New opportunities From customer feedback Move again into project definition PROCESS OUTPUT Total customer satisfaction

14 14 Summary Third party auditing system is recommended and shall be part of the health care facility policy. More effective and advanced measurement tools shall be utilized to alert the top management in case of deficiencies or deviation One year plan a head should be established and maintained as road map to wards successes and prosperity. Customer should do this practice at the beginning by implementing all quality system requirements to prevent losses and unnecessary cost impact. All these data and procedure shall be maintained and made available as lesson learn to every body in the organization.

15 15 Thank You


Download ppt "1 King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Department of Construction Engineering & Management CEM 515: Project Quality Management Case study of 8-phases."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google