2. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3 Association: Contingency, Correlation, and Regression Section 3.2 The Association Between Two Quantitative Variables

3. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 3 Graphical display of relationship between two quantitative variables:  Horizontal Axis: Explanatory variable, x  Vertical Axis: Response variable, y The Scatterplot: Looking for a Trend Figure 3.5 MINITAB Scatterplot for Internet Use and Facebook Use for 33 Countries. The point for Japan is labeled and has coordinates x = 74 and y = 2. Question: Is there any point that you would identify as standing out in some way? Which country does it represent, and how is it unusual in the context of these variables?

4. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 4 Example: Internet and Facebook Penetration Rates Table 3.4 Internet and Facebook Penetration Rates For 33 Countries

5. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 5 Table 3.4 Internet and Facebook Penetration Rates For 33 Countries, cont’d. Example: Internet and Facebook Penetration Rates

6. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 6 Example: Internet and Facebook Penetration Rates Using MINITAB, we obtain the following numerical measures of center and spread: Variable N Mean StDev Minimum Q1 MedianQ3 Max Internet Use 33 47.00 24.40 7.00 24.00 49.00 68.50 83.00 Facebook Use 33 24.73 16.49 0.00 11.00 26.00 38.00 52.00 Figure 3.4 MINITAB histograms of Internet use and Facebook use for the 33 countries. Question: Which nations, if any, might be outliers in terms of Internet use? Facebook use? Which graphical display would more clearly identify potential outliers?

7. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 7 We examine a scatterplot to study association. How do values on the response variable change as values of the explanatory variable change? You can describe the overall pattern of a scatterplot by the trend, direction, and strength of the relationship between the two variables.  Trend: linear, curved, clusters, no pattern  Direction: positive, negative, no direction  Strength: how closely the points fit the trend Also look for outliers from the overall trend. How to Examine a Scatterplot

8. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 8 Two quantitative variables x and y are  Positively associated when  high values of x tend to occur with high values of y.  low values of x tend to occur with low values of y.  Negatively associated when high values of one variable tend to pair with low values of the other variable. Interpreting Scatterplots: Direction/Association

9. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 9 Question: Would you expect a positive association, a negative association or no association between the age of the car and the mileage on the odometer?  Positive association  Negative association  No association Example: 100 cars on the lot of a used-car dealership

10. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 10 In Figure 3.6, one point falls well above the others. This severe outlier is the observation for Palm Beach County, the county that had the butterfly ballot. It is far removed from the overall trend for the other 66 data points, which follow an approximately straight line. Example: The Butterfly Ballot and the 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Figure 3.6 MINITAB Scatterplot of Florida Countywide Vote for Reform Party Candidates Pat Buchanan in 2000 and Ross Perot in 1996. Question: Why is the top point, but not each of the two rightmost points, considered an outlier relative to the overall trend of the data points?

11. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 11 The Correlation measures the strength and direction of the linear association between x and y.  A positive r value indicates a positive association.  A negative r value indicates a negative association.  An r value close to +1 or -1 indicates a strong linear association.  An r value close to 0 indicates a weak association. Summarizing the Strength of Association: The Correlation, r

12. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 12 Let’s get a feel for the correlation r by looking at its values for the scatterplots shown in Figure 3.7: Correlation Coefficient: Measuring Strength and Direction of a Linear Relationship Figure 3.7 Some Scatterplots and Their Correlations. The correlation gets closer to when the data points fall closer to a straight line. Question: Why are the cases in which the data points are closer to a straight line considered to represent stronger association?

13. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 13  Always falls between -1 and +1.  Sign of correlation denotes direction  (-) indicates negative linear association  (+) indicates positive linear association  Correlation has a unit-less measure, it does not depend on the variables’ units.  Two variables have the same correlation no matter which is treated as the response variable.  Correlation is not resistant to outliers.  Correlation only measures strength of a linear relationship. Properties of Correlation

14. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 14 Calculating the Correlation Coefficient CountryPer Capita GDP (x)Life Expectancy (y) Austria21.477.48 Belgium23.277.53 Finland20.077.32 France22.778.63 Germany20.877.17 Ireland18.676.39 Italy21.578.51 Netherlands22.078.15 Switzerland23.878.99 United Kingdom21.277.37 Example: Per Capita Gross Domestic Product and Average Life Expectancy for Countries in Western Europe.

15. Copyright © 2013, 2009, and 2007, Pearson Education, Inc. 15 xY 21.477.48-0.078-0.3450.027 23.277.531.097-0.282-0.309 20.077.32-0.992-0.5460.542 22.778.630.7701.1020.849 20.877.17-0.470-0.7350.345 18.676.39-1.906-1.7163.271 21.578.51-0.0130.951-0.012 22.078.150.3130.4980.156 23.878.991.4891.5552.315 21.277.37-0.209-0.4830.101 = 21.52 = 77.754 sum = 7.285 s x =1.532s y =0.795 Example: Per Capita Gross Domestic Product and Average Life Expectancy for Countries in Western Europe. Calculating the Correlation Coefficient