Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Identifying and Assessing Neglect using the Graded Care Profile

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Identifying and Assessing Neglect using the Graded Care Profile"— Presentation transcript:

1 Identifying and Assessing Neglect using the Graded Care Profile
Patrick Ayre Department of Applied Social Studies University of Bedfordshire Park Square, Luton Presentation can be downloaded from:

2 A child centred approach
The purpose of assessment is to understand what it is like to be that child (and what it will be like in the future if nothing changes)

3 Understanding and assessing neglect
Parents who neglect their children basically just don’t know any better because of their own poor upbringings. If we send them to a family centre for Parental Skills training, all will be well.

4 Understanding and assessing neglect
Parents who neglect their children basically just don’t know any better because of their own poor upbringings. If we send them to a family centre for Parental Skills training, all will be well. IF ONLY!!....

5 Understanding and assessing neglect
So neglected children who come into care may be a bit thin, a bit dirty, badly in need of seeing a doctor or dentist, maybe a bit wild. But we can place them with foster carers for a bit of looking after, a bit of TLC, a bit of structure and everything will be fine. The children will absolutely love it and will immediately start to thrive. Simple really!

6 Understanding and assessing neglect
So neglected children who come into care may be a bit thin, a bit dirty, badly in need of seeing a doctor or dentist, maybe a bit wild. But we can place them with foster carers for a bit of looking after, a bit of TLC, a bit of structure and everything will be fine. The children will absolutely love it and will immediately start to thrive. Simple really! IF ONLY!!.... The damage is not on the surface, it often runs quite deep and we need to understand how it got there in order to put it right. Painful though it is, we need to understand what it does to you to be neglected.

7 Understanding and assessing neglect
Brain development By the age of 3, a baby’s brain has reached almost 90 percent of its adult size. The growth in each region of the brain largely depends on receiving stimulation. This stimulation provides the foundation for learning.

8 Experience Affects the Structure of the Brain
Understanding and assessing neglect Experience Affects the Structure of the Brain Brain development is “activity-dependent” Every experience excites some neural circuits and leaves others alone Neural circuits used over and over strengthen, those that are not used are dropped resulting in “pruning”

9 Understanding and assessing neglect

10 Understanding and assessing neglect

11 Understanding and assessing neglect

12 Understanding and assessing neglect
Poor integration of hemispheres and underdevelopment of the orbitofrontal cortex Difficulty regulating emotion, Lack of cause-effect thinking, Inability to recognize emotions in others, Inability to articulate own emotions, Incoherent sense of self and autobiographical history Lack of conscience.

13 Other physiological issues
Understanding and assessing neglect Serotonin: emotional stability and feeling good Malnutrition: cognitive and motor delays, anxiety, depression, social problems, and attention problems Myelination Sensitive periods (infancy & attachment)

14 Emotional development
Understanding and assessing neglect Sensitive period for emotional development: up to 18 months Shaped primarily by the way in which the prime carer interacts with the child Emotional deficits harder to overcome once the sensitive window has passed. How often do we intervene assertively at this point?

15 Understanding and assessing neglect
Building a child Building a child is like building a house, each new level built on the one below. If the lower levels are unsound, no amount of tinkering with the upper floors will make it stable.

16 Capturing chronic abuse
Understanding and assessing neglect Capturing chronic abuse Single events often only significant in context; Can often only understand present by setting in context of past Intangible: Difficult to capture and compare High threshold for recognition Neglect is a pattern not an event

17 The pattern of neglect: atypical

18 Understanding and assessing neglect
The pattern of neglect

19 Understanding and assessing neglect
The pattern of neglect

20 Understanding and assessing neglect
The pattern of neglect

21 Understanding and assessing neglect
The pattern of neglect

22 Understanding and assessing neglect
Cumulativeness Child protection system is triggered when threshold of likely significant harm has been crossed. Physical and sexual abuse, where a serious precipitating incident comes to light which clearly crosses the threshold at once. Many chronic cases may be characterised by a lengthy pattern of actions or incidents, none of which is in itself sufficient to trigger intervention. They have to get added together like this

23 Failure of cumulativeness
Understanding and assessing neglect Failure of cumulativeness

24 Understanding and assessing neglect
What’s the problem? Chronic abuse and the principle of cumulativeness Files very long and badly structured Patterns missed and ‘chronic abuse’ overlooked The problem of proportionality Acclimatisation (case, agency and geographical) Three principle reasons for this failure of cumulativeness. The first is that the incidents giving rise to concern may lie scattered through the relevant files, recorded and responded to separately with no one making cumulative connections between them. They may lie unshared on the files of a variety of different interested agencies or unremarked within the files of a single agency. Picked up and put down Many 'duty worker' and 'team responsibility' systems may be prone to this failing. The notion of proportionality: uncomfortable about invoking the full might of the system over a 'minor' incident, even where this incident is just one of a very worrying series. Acclimatised to unacceptably low standards, typified by remarks such as 'What can you expect from this family?' or 'That's the way they are; they've always been the same'. Conditions likely to cause significant harm come to be regarded as the norm and all future incidents come to be judged against this depressed standard with the result that incidents have to be increasingly bad to be identified as causing concern at all and the cumulative effect on the child is overlooked.

25 The assessment of neglect
An approach based on the Graded Care Profile by Dr OP Shrivastava GCP provides: Framework for making assessment Baseline measurement An element of objectivity Judgement about care Reliable standardised evidence 183&Itemid=52

26 GCP uses Pre-referral assessments Snapshot assessments
Contribution to CAF assessments Contribution to Core Assessment (parenting capacity) Self-assessment (parents and carers) Young person’s assessment of parenting Tool for setting goals and assessing progress Tool to facilitate discussion

27 (GCP parenting capacity)
Section 47 CAF GCP Initial Assessment Enquiries (GCP – neglect) Core Assessment (GCP parenting capacity) Protection / Support Plan GCP – monitoring tool

28 GCP users Health visitors School nurses Social workers
Family centre workers Education staff

29 Why choose GCP? Child focused User friendly Common language
Promotes partnership

30 Why choose GCP? Evaluates strengths as well as weaknesses
Allows progress to be assessed A relatively objective measure Allows help to be targeted where needed

31 Love and belongingness
Domains of Care Stimulation Approval Disapproval Acceptance Sensitivity Responsivity Reciprocity Overtures Self actualisation Esteem Love and belongingness Present & absent Safety As Prakash said he used Maslow’s work to build on using the four domains and further sub-dividing them. Physical needs Nutrition. Housing, Clothing, Hygiene & Health Maslow, A. 1954

32 What to observe Nutrition Housing Clothing Hygiene Health Quality,
Quantity, Preparation, Organisation, A. PHYSICAL B. SAFETY C. LOVE D. ESTEEM

33 Grades of Care Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Level of care
All child’s needs met Essential needs fully met Some essential needs met Most essential needs unmet Essential needs entirely unmet/hostile Commitment to care Child first Child priority Child/carer at par Child second Child not considered Quality of care Best Adequate Equivocal Poor Worst

34 Scoring Rating 1 5 Use on every child in the family
Use with different carers Complete with the parent/carer Use information, observation, records

35 DO NOT JUSTIFY BY REASONS
Scoring Score as actually fits the manual – DO NOT JUSTIFY BY REASONS If there is a score of 4 or 5, this overrides any other scores Scores between 1 and 3, record the one which crops up most If there is an even split, the highest score is entered

36 Scoring Complete the full reference scheme
Transpose to the record sheet

37

38 Scoring Complete the full reference scheme
Transpose to the record sheet

39 Sub-Area Scores Area Score Comments (A) Physical 1. NUTRITION 1 2 3 4 5 2. HOUSING 3. CLOTHING 4. HYGIENE 5. HEALTH (B) Safety 1. IN CARER’S PRESENCE 2. IN CARER’S ABSENCE (C) Love 1. CARER 2. MUTUAL ENGAGEMENT (D) Esteem 1. STIMULATION 2. APPROVAL 3. DISAPPROVAL 4. ACCEPTANCE

40 AREAS A ? 1 ? Items a b c d 3 2 3 1 2 ? a b c 4 2 2 3 ? a b c 2 2 2 4
Reference Sheet Sub-areas 1 ? Items a b c d 3 2 3 1 2 ? a b c 4 2 2 3 ? a b c 2 2 2 4 3 5 ? a b c d 3 3 2 2

41 DO NOT JUSTIFY BY REASONS
Scoring Score as actually fits the manual – DO NOT JUSTIFY BY REASONS If there is a score of 4 or 5, this overrides any other scores Between 1 and 3, when there are more of one score, record the one with the most If there is an even split, the highest score is entered

42 AREAS A 1 Items a b c d 3 2 3 1 2 a b c 4 2 2 3 a b c 2 2 2 4 3 5 a b
Reference Sheet Sub-areas 1 Items a b c d 3 2 3 1 2 a b c 4 2 2 3 a b c 2 2 2 4 3 5 a b c d 3 3 2 2

43 AREAS A 4 1 3 Items a b c d 3 2 3 1 2 4 a b c 4 2 2 3 2 a b c 2 2 2 4
Reference Sheet Sub-areas 1 3 Items a b c d 3 2 3 1 2 4 a b c 4 2 2 3 2 a b c 2 2 2 4 3 5 3 a b c d 3 3 2 2

44

45 Targeting Items of Care
Targeted Areas Current Score Target Score Timescale Reviewed Score 1 2 3 4 5

46 Assessing progress

47 Unique Advantages Common language, common reference
Objective measure – child focussed Effective tool to promote partnership assessments and planning with parents User friendly Comprehensively covers all areas of care Child and carer specific

48 Understanding and assessing neglect
Assessment Pitfalls Parents’ behaviour, whether co-operative or uncooperative, often misinterpreted Information from family friends and neighbours undervalued Coping with aggressive or frightening families Failure to give sufficient weight to relevant case history; ‘Start again syndrome’ Not enough attention is paid to what children say, how they look and how they behave; maintenance of a wholly child-centred approach

49 A child centred approach
The purpose of assessment is to understand what it is like to be that child (and what it will be like in the future if nothing changes)

50 Information handling pitfalls
Understanding and assessing neglect Information handling pitfalls Picking out the important from a mass of data Facts recorded faithfully but not always critically appraised Too trusting/insufficiently critical; Decoyed by another problem False certainty; undue faith in a ‘known fact’ Discarding information which does not fit the model we have formed Department of Health (1991) Child abuse: A study of inquiry reports, , HMSO, London

51 Assessment pitfalls Rule of optimism Natural love Cultural relativism
Too much not enough Adult services and children’s services (hand-in-hand or hand-to-hand?)

52 Children’s services and adult services
Working on the same case but not working jointly Mutual incomprehension and misunderstanding False expectations and assumptions Abdicating responsibility Need for ‘interpreters’

53 Information handling pitfalls
Keeping your head down Hesitancy to challenge other professionals or the conventional wisdom Tendency to move from facts to actions without ‘showing your working’ JB (Late 2006) Wirral Children and Young People's Services (Social Care) should seek to ascertain whether assessment practice and judgments about thresholds in child safeguarding cases across the borough as a whole currently accord with recognised accepted local and national standards… The findings of Children and Young People's Services’ enquiries this enquiry should be reported to LSCB, together with an action plan identifying the steps to be taken to remedy any shortfalls which are identified JLS (late 2008) The LSCB should consider auditing both core assessments and common assessments in order to ensure that staff, on a multi agency basis, are adequately trained and have sufficient skills to undertake good quality assessments. In the light of this audit training needs should be identified and a training programme implemented. SCRs are not individual events but should be viewed as a cumulative repository of knowledge Failure to use case history (JB) New file started despite 12 years of involvement. A couple of months for cases to arrive may lead to a ‘start again syndrome culture. Use of case history (JB) when there were acute concerns about the care she received from her father, teenager placed with grandmother and grandfather with severe drink problems, he had masturbated in front of her, she had assaulted her; when this broke down, placed with her father who used to send her out to buy drugs for him and may have encouraged her into a sexual relationship with his dealer.

54 Challenge your dodgy thinking
I am only a… and he is a…, so I had better keep my opinion to myself. I am obviously in a minority, so I had better keep my opinion to myself. We need to maintain harmonious relations, so I had better keep my opinion to myself. Incomplete Remember, this is a sales pitch (give the client what they need) Always think of your audience, what do they need to know? In this case:

55 Gabriela Mistral (Chilean poet, 1889-1957)
A final thought “We are guilty of many errors and many faults but the worst of our crimes is abandoning our children, neglecting the fountain of life. Many of the things we need can wait. The child cannot. Right now is the time his bones are being formed, his blood is being made, and his senses are being developed. To him we cannot answer 'Tomorrow.' His name is 'Today.'” Gabriela Mistral (Chilean poet, )


Download ppt "Identifying and Assessing Neglect using the Graded Care Profile"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google