Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Identifying cases & Quality Assurance: Data Completeness & Accreditation The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Data Collection session.

Published byDrusilla Lynch Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Identifying cases & Quality Assurance: Data Completeness & Accreditation The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Data Collection session."— Presentation transcript:

1 Identifying cases & Quality Assurance: Data Completeness & Accreditation The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Data Collection session

2 Identifying cases: 2 case studies

3 System 1: Retrospective Data capture Clinical (ICD10) codes  Clinical coding departments use a coding system called ICD10  ICD10: International Classification of Diseases  ICD10 codes document: Admission reason (Injury, Medical, Elective, Complication)  ICD10 codes that begin with S or T indicate injury e.g.  S82.2: fracture to shaft of tibia  S82.21: open shaft of tibia  S82.20: closed shaft of tibia  T055: Traumatic amputation of both legs

4  Trust IT dept. can therefore generate weekly spreadsheet showing:  Patients discharged previous week with any S or T ICD10 code  Filtering out:  <3 days stay, discharge destination = home  65+ isolated NOF  65+ isolated pubic rami fracture  Minor injuries  Full list of all applicable ICD10 codes: www.tarn.ac.uk/resourceswww.tarn.ac.uk/resources  Result: List of potential TARN patients  Check imaging reports to ensure inclusion System 1: Retrospective Data capture Clinical (ICD10) codes

5 System 1: Retrospective Data capture Clinical (ICD10) codes

6 Example ICD10 spreadsheet Age Admission Date Discharge DateDisch. DestinationLoSDiag. 1 ICDDiag. 1 Text Diag. 2 ICDDiag. 2 Text Diag. 3 ICD Diag. 4 ICD Diag. 5 ICD Diag. 6 ICD 8405/06/201016/07/2010NHS NURSING41S0650 TRAUMATIC SUBDURAL HAEMATOMAK709ALCOHOLIC LIVER DAMAGE UNSPECIFIEDL031B181F102N179 8414/12/201006/01/2011USUAL RESIDENCE23S825 FRACTURE OF MEDIAL MALLEOLUSS526 CLOSED FRACTURE OF RADIUS AND ULNA, LOWER ENDV99X 8226/11/201001/12/2010PATIENT DIED5S063 CLOSED HINDBRAIN CONTUSIONW199 [X]UNSPECIFIED FALL, OCCURRENCE AT UNSPECIFIED PLACEN390I48XI120I258 7801/06/201016/07/2010USUAL RESIDENCE45S323 CLOSED FRACTURE OF ILIUM, UNSPECIFIEDN390 URINARY TRACT INFECTION, SITE NOT SPECIFIED NOSI10XF339F319E039 7804/07/201009/08/2010USUAL RESIDENCE36S220 CLOSED FRACTURE THORACIC VERTEBRAW190 [X]UNSPECIFIED FALL, OCCURRENCE AT HOMEN390J22XI639I10X 7519/09/201005/10/2010 NON-NHS RUN RESID. CARE HOME16S422 CLOSED FRACTURE PROXIMAL HUMERUS, NECKS721 CLOSED FRACTURE OF FEMUR, INTERTROCHANTERICW194N390D649E039 7503/10/201003/11/2010 NHS NURSING HOME/31S327 MULTIPLE FRACTURES OF LUMBAR SPINE AND PELVISS499 [X]UNSPECIFIED INJURY OF SHOULDER AND UPPER ARMW109N390R32XI10X 7503/11/201021/12/2010USUAL RESIDENCE48Z501[X]OTHER PHYSICAL THERAPYS327 MULTIPLE FRACTURES OF LUMBAR SPINE AND PELVISS499I350R32XI10X  Patients potentially have multiple ICD10 (Diagnosis) codes  Ensure your Trust reviews the first 5 diagnosis codes  Reviewing Primary Diagnosis code only – will definitely result in missed cases

7 System 1: Retrospective Data capture Clinical (ICD10) codes: Advantages Captures patients who bypass ED (transfers in, GP admissions) TARN can liaise with IT to help set this up: SQL script Limited staff resource required Used by most Trauma Units who employ Retrospective data capture Used as backup to “live” data capture by most Major Trauma Centres

8  Only admitted patients are assigned an ICD10 code  Transfers out from ED  Deaths in ED  Separate system required to capture these  Accuracy of Trust ICD10 coding  Use of NOS (not otherwise specified) codes can increase potential cases  Cases admitted for Rehabilitation only – not easily identified  Delay between discharge and clinical coding System 1: Retrospective Data capture Clinical (ICD10) codes: Disadvantages

9 System 2: Live Data capture Employed by Royal Stoke University Hospital Major Trauma Centre North West Midlands & North Wales Major Trauma Network

10 System 2: Live Data capture Employed by Royal Stoke University Hospital Major Trauma Centre  Diary in Resuscitation completed by ED Consultant.  Data Co-ordinators pagers that receive Trauma Calls.  ED system search: Patients who were imaged & admitted.  Daily contact with relevant Wards: Notification of any trauma patients admitted.  Attend morning Orthopaedic/Neurosurgical case discussion meetings.  Liaise with Rehabilitation Co-ordinators re: Trauma patients seen on wards When eligible cases identified:  Early care data collected on forms by TNC & Data coordinators whilst still inpatient.  Later care data (Operation, ICU, Imaging, Ward, Discharge data) taken from online systems.

11 System 2: Live Data capture: Advantages Employed by Royal Stoke University Hospital Major Trauma Centre  Very little backlog; patients often dispatched to TARN day after discharge.  Case notes only required for “missed” cases identified post discharge.  Regular communication between Coordinators & Clinicians.  Rehabilitation Co-ordinators involved very early on.  Deaths data: Available from Bereavement office quickly, no waiting for inquest.

12 System 2: Live Data capture: Disadvantages Employed by Royal Stoke University Hospital Major Trauma Centre  Greater staff resource required  Post discharge ICD10 report required to capture “missed” patients.

13 Collecting the data  Retrospective Data Entry: Post discharge  Access to electronic Imaging and Theatre systems required  Enter data directly from notes or use Pro-forma  CORE PROFORMA IN REPORTS SECTION OF WEBSITE  DO NOT have to start and finish a submission in one session

14 Quality Assurance Data Completeness (quantity) & Data Accreditation (quality)

15 Data completeness % Measure of Expected v Submitted number of cases  HES Data used to calculate expected no. of cases per Trust  HES = Hospital Episode Statistics database  HES data contains ICD10 codes assigned by Trusts in previous year: 2013  TARN Inclusion criteria applied to HES data  No. of Expected cases then derived  Expected number of cases used as a guide only. Not a 100% target!  All eligible cases should be submitted to TARN

16 Data completeness % Measure of Expected v Submitted number of cases  % of expected v submitted cases shown on TARN website  Updated every 4 months: End of  March  July  November  Shown as Trust and individual Hospital figures  Should always be viewed alongside Hospital Survival rate

17 Data Completeness calculation Data Completeness 76.1% Submissions: NUMERATOR238 Expected submissions: DENOMINATOR313 Data completeness76.1% HES dataset/ Denominator TARN submissions/Numerator 1-49%: May not reflect true practice 50-79%: May not reflect true practice 80%+: View with confidence

18 Improving Data completeness HES v TARN 2013 Data comparison exercise

19 HES v TARN 2013 comparison exercise Comparison spreadsheet produced:  Green: Cases appear in both datasets (Submission ID shown)  Black: Cases appear in HES dataset only (not submitted in TARN) ‘Not TARN eligible’ field: Completed by Trust & Fed-back to TARN  Missing cases: Issues identified & entered: Increase in Numerator  Ineligible cases: Removed from expected no. of cases: Decrease in Denominator

20 HES v TARN 2013 comparison exercise results Commonly missed groups:  Aged 65+ Hip fractures with other (non hand or foot) fracture  Traumatic SDH admitted to medical wards  Aged 65+ Pelvic fractures  Spinal fractures  Patients whose LOS is exactly 3 days Common reasons for the variance between the HES and TARN:  Inaccuracies in ICD10 coding  Old injuries being coded.  Use of NOS (Not Specified) codes, which varies from trust to trust  Rehabilitation only admissions  Elective admissions  45 Trust participated in exercise  >3,700 cases removed from Expected no. of cases  18% reduction & comparable Data Collection increase

21 Data Accreditation % (quality) Measure of frequency of CORE data field completion CURRENT ACCREDITATION FIELDS Glasgow Coma Score or Intubation/ventilation (Pre Hospital or ED) Incident or Call 999 Date/time Arrival time Transfer: Reason & Date of Referral CT time Operation: Start time, grade & speciality of surgeon & grade of anaesthetist ED Doctors: Time seen, grade & speciality Injury detail – proportion of NFS codes

22 NEW ADDITIONS TO ACCREDITATION FIELDS *Pre-existing conditions **Pupil reactivity for patients with AIS 3+ (Serious) head injuries Data Accreditation%: Recent additions From December 2014 onwards * New Probability of Survival (Ps)14 model ‘Other’ and ‘Not Known’ detrimental to Data Accreditation **Future Probability of Survival model

23 Data Accreditation  Data Accreditation report available on TARN  Missing fields highlighted

24 Questions?

Download ppt "Identifying cases & Quality Assurance: Data Completeness & Accreditation The Trauma Audit & Research Network (TARN) Data Collection session."

Similar presentations

The Data Quality Team Information Governance Ext 8168 The Importance Of Data Quality High Data Quality is Important to: * Improve Patient Care * Reduce.

The Data Quality Team Information Governance Ext 8168 The Importance Of Data Quality High Data Quality is Important to: * Improve Patient Care * Reduce.
Medical Informatics Assignment 2 Patient Discharge System By King Ken Law Philip McCormac Edel Hughes.

Medical Informatics Assignment 2 Patient Discharge System By King Ken Law Philip McCormac Edel Hughes.
Falls Analysis Fragility Fractures for patients aged 50 years and over (Using SEPHO ICD10 diagnosis definition) Draft v0.1 19 March 2011.

Falls Analysis Fragility Fractures for patients aged 50 years and over (Using SEPHO ICD10 diagnosis definition) Draft v March 2011.
COPD Analyses Updated – 7th February 2011 17 February 2011.

COPD Analyses Updated – 7th February February 2011.
Www.chks.co.uk Epidemiology and benefit to patients from accurate coding Heather Walker CHKS Consultancy and Marketing Director 4 th May 2012.

Epidemiology and benefit to patients from accurate coding Heather Walker CHKS Consultancy and Marketing Director 4 th May 2012.
The Trauma Audit & Research Network Electronic Data Collection & Reporting system: The New CORE DATASET Launched January 2011.

The Trauma Audit & Research Network Electronic Data Collection & Reporting system: The New CORE DATASET Launched January 2011.
Driving Clinical Coding Forward Data Quality for Improvement – the clinical coder’s perspective Jayne Harding Senior Clinical Classifications Advisor 24.

Driving Clinical Coding Forward Data Quality for Improvement – the clinical coder’s perspective Jayne Harding Senior Clinical Classifications Advisor 24.
Inefficiencies in provision of acute care with poor use of estate Dependence on hospital care with failure to transfer care to community Need for more.

Inefficiencies in provision of acute care with poor use of estate Dependence on hospital care with failure to transfer care to community Need for more.
Ideas from UK modernisation: The Improvement Partnership for Hospitals Penny Pereira Ideas from UK modernisation.

Ideas from UK modernisation: The Improvement Partnership for Hospitals Penny Pereira Ideas from UK modernisation.
ASE Event Slides  Major Trauma  Sepsis  QIPP 114 June 2010.

ASE Event Slides  Major Trauma  Sepsis  QIPP 114 June 2010.
Improve accuracy of clinical coding

Improve accuracy of clinical coding
Shaping a service Colin Hughes Consultant Nurse - Older People (Mental Health) Chesterfield Primary Care Trust.

Shaping a service Colin Hughes Consultant Nurse - Older People (Mental Health) Chesterfield Primary Care Trust.
A Major Problem for the Health Service p Worldwide injury is a major public health problem p The commonest cause of death between the ages of 1 and 40.

A Major Problem for the Health Service p Worldwide injury is a major public health problem p The commonest cause of death between the ages of 1 and 40.
Healthcare The London for LondonTrauma System Launch Maralyn Woodford The TRAUMA Audit & Research NETWORK The Trauma Audit & Research Network.

Healthcare The London for LondonTrauma System Launch Maralyn Woodford The TRAUMA Audit & Research NETWORK The Trauma Audit & Research Network.
Overview of the hospital’s computer systems www.coch.org.

Overview of the hospital’s computer systems
Patient Access & Flow “One Number” June 27, 2014.

Patient Access & Flow “One Number” June 27, 2014.
EVALUATION OF WISCONSIN STATE TRAUMA REGISTRY DATA LAURA D. CASSIDY, MS, PHD E. BROOKE LERNER, PHD MELISSA CHRISTENSEN AUGUST 8, 2012 2008-2011.

EVALUATION OF WISCONSIN STATE TRAUMA REGISTRY DATA LAURA D. CASSIDY, MS, PHD E. BROOKE LERNER, PHD MELISSA CHRISTENSEN AUGUST 8,
Hospital maintain various indexes and register so that each health records and other health information can be located and classified for Patient care.

Hospital maintain various indexes and register so that each health records and other health information can be located and classified for Patient care.
Multiple Cause of Death: An Update on Recommendations for Selecting a Main Injury Wellington, New Zealand 29 September 2012 Holly Hedegaard, MD, MSPH Office.

Multiple Cause of Death: An Update on Recommendations for Selecting a Main Injury Wellington, New Zealand 29 September 2012 Holly Hedegaard, MD, MSPH Office.
25 January 2013 Dr Ian Arnott UK Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) audit Audit of inpatients with ulcerative colitis 1st January 2013 – 31st December 2013.

25 January 2013 Dr Ian Arnott UK Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) audit Audit of inpatients with ulcerative colitis 1st January 2013 – 31st December 2013.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google