Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

EMBARGOED UNTIL WEDNESDAY September 14, 2011 8:00 AM NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNTIL EMBARGO HAS EXPIRED.

Published byLucas Hardy Modified over 8 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "EMBARGOED UNTIL WEDNESDAY September 14, 2011 8:00 AM NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNTIL EMBARGO HAS EXPIRED."— Presentation transcript:

1 EMBARGOED UNTIL WEDNESDAY September 14, 2011 8:00 AM NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNTIL EMBARGO HAS EXPIRED

2 Minnesota Assessments 2011 Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCA) Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments-Modified (MCA-Modified) Minnesota Test of Academic Skills (MTAS) Test of Emerging Academic English (TEAE) Minnesota Student Oral Language Observation Matrix (MN SOLOM) September 14, 2011

3 3 2011 Assessment Summary Minnesota students showed slight improvement in overall reading scores. Minnesota students in grades 3-8 took new, more rigorous math assessments aligned to higher standards designed to prepare all kids to be career and college ready. Minnesota students in 11 th grade showed improvement in math, reflecting an increased emphasis in recent years on more rigorous math coursework. We continue to see a persistent disparity in achievement between students of color, students in poverty and their white counterparts. This achievement gap reflects the urgent need to focus time, attention and resources to ensure all children achieve at high levels. Strategies outlined in Governor Dayton’s 7 Point Plan, a statewide focus on high standards and meaningful assessment, and continuous efforts by MDE to support effective teaching and learning aim to close Minnesota’s persistent achievement gap and ensure all students achieve at high levels.

4 4 2011 Assessments 2011 Mathematics assessments in grades 3-8 aligned to 2007 Minnesota Academic Standards –Inaugural administration –Increased rigor from 2003 Minnesota Academic Standards Mathematics Test for English Language Learners was eliminated –Principles incorporated in development of new Mathematics assessments –Most English Learners moved to the Mathematics MCA 2011 Reading assessments continue to be aligned to 2003 Minnesota Academic Standards

5 5 2011 Assessments The MCA-Modified allows more students receiving Special Education services to demonstrate what they know and can do –The MCA-Modified results reflect high expectations for students with disabilities. –The MCA-Modified was designed to be a more appropriate measure of mathematics/reading knowledge and skills for some students with disabilities. Students eligible for the MCA-Modified achieved the Does Not Meet the Standards level in previous administrations of the MCA. Some of these students were able to demonstrate achievement levels of Partially Meets, Meets and Exceeds the Standards on this alternate assessment based on modified achievement standards. –Students taking the MCA-Modified must have Standards-based goals in their Individualized Education Programs (IEP). As this best practice is more widely implemented across the state, we anticipate the numbers of students achieving proficiency will increase.

6 6 2011 Assessment Participation Most students took the MCA, but some special education students took the MCA-Modified or MTAS

7 Mathematics Overall Including MCA MCA-Modified MTAS

8 8 2011 Results 2011 MATHEMATICS RESULTS Mathematics results show decline in percentage of all students proficient on all assessments (8.7%) –Grades 3-8 Math assessments align to standards with increased rigor –Anticipate an increase in proficiency as standards are more consistently implemented across the state

9 9 All Mathematics (MCA, MTELL, MCA-Modified, MTAS ) Percentage of Students Proficient by Year Includes MTELL from 2007-2010; MTAS from 2007-2011; MCA-Modified introduced in 2011; MCA-III replaced MCA-II in 2011 grades 3-8.

10 10 All Mathematics (MCA, MTELL, MCA-Modified, MTAS ) Percentage of Students Proficient in Each Grade Includes MTELL from 2007-2010; MTAS from 2007-2011; MCA-Modified introduced in 2011; MCA-III replaced MCA-II in 2011 grades 3-8.

11 Mathematics MCA

12 12 2011 Results 2011 MATHEMATICS MCA RESULTS MCA in grades 3-8 shows decline in percentage of students proficient on assessments –First year aligned to 2007 Minnesota Academic Standards in Mathematics Aligned to college-and career-ready, internationally benchmarked standards –Anticipate an increase in proficiency as standards are more consistently implemented across the state MCA in grade 11 shows 5.3% increase

13 13 Mathematics MCA Percentage of Students Proficient in Each Grade by Year MCA-III replaced MCA-II in 2011 grades 3-8. Some students took MTELL from 2007-2010, MTAS from 2007-2011 and MCA-Modified in 2011.

14 14 2011 Mathematics MCA Percentage of Students at Each Achievement Level % may not add to 100 due to rounding

15 15 Grade 3 Mathematics MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity MCA-III replaced MCA-II in 2011. Some students took MTELL from 2007-2010 and MTAS from 2007-2011.

16 16 Grade 4 Mathematics MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity MCA-III replaced MCA-II in 2011. Some students took MTELL from 2007-2010, and MTAS from 2007-2011.

17 17 Grade 5 Mathematics MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity MCA-III replaced MCA-II in 2011. Some students took MTELL from 2007-2010, MTAS from 2007-2011 and MCA-Modified in 2011.

18 18 Grade 6 Mathematics MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity MCA-III replaced MCA-II in 2011. Some students took MTELL from 2007-2010, MTAS from 2007-2011 and MCA-Modified in 2011.

19 19 Grade 7 Mathematics MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity MCA-III replaced MCA-II in 2011. Some students took MTELL from 2007-2010, MTAS from 2007-2011 and MCA-Modified in 2011.

20 20 Grade 8 Mathematics MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity MCA-III replaced MCA-II in 2011. Some students took MTELL from 2007-2010, MTAS from 2007-2011 and MCA-Modified in 2011.

21 21 Grade 11 Mathematics MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity Some students took MTELL from 2007-2010, MTAS from 2007-2011 and MCA-Modified in 2011.

22 Mathematics MCA-Modified

23 23 2011 Results 2011 MATHEMATICS MCA-Modified RESULTS Results are not as high as desired –Also aligned to rigorous on-grade level standards –Anticipate an increase in proficiency as eligibility requirements are better understood and Standards-based IEPs implemented –Many students achieved Partially Meets (many previously at Does Not Meet on MCA)

24 24 Mathematics MCA-Modified Percentage of Students Proficient on Modified Achievement Standards in Each Grade - 2011

25 25 2011 Mathematics MCA-Modified Percentage of Students at Each Achievement Level % may not add to 100 due to rounding

26 Mathematics MTAS

27 27 2011 Results 2011 MATHEMATICS MTAS RESULTS MTAS results are mixed across the grade levels

28 28 Mathematics MTAS Percentage of Students Proficient on Alternate Achievement Standards in Each Grade by Year Mathematics MTAS-III replaced MTAS in 2011 grades 3-8.

29 29 2011 Mathematics MTAS Percentage of Students at Each Achievement Level % may not add to 100 due to rounding

30 Reading Overall Including MCA MCA-Modified MTAS

31 31 2011 Results 2011 READING RESULTS Reading results show increase in percentage of all students proficient on all assessments (1.6%)

32 32 All Reading (MCA, MCA-Modified, MTAS) Percentage of Students Proficient by Year Most English learners took the TEAE in 2006; all were assessed using the MCA-II, MTAS or MCA-Modified in 2007 and following years.

33 33 Percentage of Students Proficient in Each Grade All Reading (MCA, MCA-Modified, MTAS) Most English learners took the TEAE in 2006; all were assessed using the MCA-II, MTAS or MCA-Modified in 2007 and following years.

34 Reading MCA

35 35 2011 Results 2011 READING MCA RESULTS MCA proficiency increased or stayed steady –Standards assessed consistent from previous years –While we see white student achievement increasing we also see progress being made in gap closure

36 36 Reading MCA Percentage of Students Proficient in Each Grade by Year Most English learners took the TEAE in 2006; all were assessed using the MCA-II, MTAS or MCA-Modified in 2007 and following years.

37 37 2011 Reading MCA Percentage of Students at Each Achievement Level % may not add to 100 due to rounding

38 38 Grade 3 Reading MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity Most English learners took the TEAE in 2006; all were assessed using the MCA-II, MTAS or MCA-Modified in 2007 and following years.

39 39 Grade 4 Reading MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity Most English learners took the TEAE in 2006; all were assessed using the MCA-II, MTAS or MCA-Modified in 2007 and following years.

40 40 Grade 5 Reading MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity Most English learners took the TEAE in 2006; all were assessed using the MCA-II, MTAS or MCA-Modified in 2007 and following years.

41 41 Grade 6 Reading MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity Most English learners took the TEAE in 2006; all were assessed using the MCA-II, MTAS or MCA-Modified in 2007 and following years.

42 42 Grade 7 Reading MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity Most English learners took the TEAE in 2006; all were assessed using the MCA-II, MTAS or MCA-Modified in 2007 and following years.

43 43 Grade 8 Reading MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity Most English learners took the TEAE in 2006; all were assessed using the MCA-II, MTAS or MCA-Modified in 2007 and following years.

44 44 Grade 10 Reading MCA Percentage of Students Proficient by Year - Ethnicity Most English learners took the TEAE in 2006; all were assessed using the MCA-II, MTAS or MCA-Modified in 2007 and following years.

45 Reading MCA-Modified

46 46 2011 Results 2011 READING MCA-Modified RESULTS MCA-Modified results are not as high as desired –Anticipate an increase in proficiency as eligibility requirements are better understood and Standards-based IEPs implemented –Overall, a majority of students performed at Partially Meets (many previously at Does Not Meet on MCA)

47 47 Reading MCA-Modified Percentage of Students Proficient on Modified Achievement Standards in Each Grade - 2011

48 48 2011 Reading MCA-Modified Percentage of Students at Each Achievement Level % may not add to 100 due to rounding

49 49 Reading MTAS

50 50 2011 Results 2011 READING MTAS RESULTS MTAS results show little change from 2010 results

51 51 Reading MTAS Percentage of Students Proficient on Alternate Achievement Standards in Each Grade by Year

52 52 2011 Reading MTAS Percentage of Students at Each Achievement Level % may not add to 100 due to rounding

53 Test of Emerging Academic English (TEAE)

54 54 Reading TEAE Percentage of Students Proficient in Each Grade by Year

55 55 Writing TEAE Percentage of Students Proficient in Each Grade by Year

56 Minnesota Student Oral Language Observation Matrix (MN SOLOM)

57 57 Listening/Speaking MN SOLOM Percentage of Students Proficient in Each Grade by Year

Download ppt "EMBARGOED UNTIL WEDNESDAY September 14, 2011 8:00 AM NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNTIL EMBARGO HAS EXPIRED."

Similar presentations

RIDE – Office of Special Populations

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?

Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota

NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Parent Advisory Council Seven Hills Classical Academy May 10, 2012.

Parent Advisory Council Seven Hills Classical Academy May 10, 2012.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 and 2009.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide 2007- 2008.

Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
2014-15 School Year September 2014 Amanda Grinager, Director of Teaching and Learning.

School Year September 2014 Amanda Grinager, Director of Teaching and Learning.
Minnesota Assessment System Update Jennifer Dugan “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”

Minnesota Assessment System Update Jennifer Dugan “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Office of Assessment October 22, 2014. PSAT/SAT/NAEP  PSAT – Pre-Scholastic Aptitude Test  SAT – Scholastic Aptitude Test  NAEP – National Assessment.

Office of Assessment October 22, PSAT/SAT/NAEP  PSAT – Pre-Scholastic Aptitude Test  SAT – Scholastic Aptitude Test  NAEP – National Assessment.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide 2007- 2008.

Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
1 2011 Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.

Grade 3-8 English Language Arts and Mathematics Results August 8, 2011.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.

1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.

MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
 State-led and developed common core standards for K-12 in English/language arts and mathematics  Initiative led by the Council of Chief State School.

 State-led and developed common core standards for K-12 in English/language arts and mathematics  Initiative led by the Council of Chief State School.
COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart

COMMON CORE Standards and Strategies Flip Chart
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Common.

TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction 1 Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness Common.
 “A well-designed IEP can change a child’s schooling experience from one of repeated failures, loss of self- esteem, and limited options to one of achievement,

 “A well-designed IEP can change a child’s schooling experience from one of repeated failures, loss of self- esteem, and limited options to one of achievement,
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.

Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.

Making Sense of Math Learning Progressions District Learning Day Friday, September 18, 2015.
MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2011-2012 MCA RESULTS. Demographics StateDistrict Number of Students8376402231 Ethnicity25.6%20.4% LEP7.7%11.1% Special Education14.8%16.8%

MARSHALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS MCA RESULTS. Demographics StateDistrict Number of Students Ethnicity25.6%20.4% LEP7.7%11.1% Special Education14.8%16.8%

Similar presentations

Ads by Google