Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEleanor Gilmore Modified over 9 years ago
1
Forest and Range Evaluation Program Five Year Strategic Plan Agathe Bernard Kevin Kilpatrick Jack Sweeten Michael Pelchat Peter Bradford
2
5 Year Strategic Plan Vision:Resource Sustainability through Science and Stewardship. Mission:To be a world leader in resource stewardship monitoring and effectiveness evaluations; providing the science-based information needed for decision-making and continuous improvement of British Columbia’s forest and range practices, policies and legislation.
3
5 Year Strategic Plan Key strategies – Achieving Excellence in: Clarity of priorities Leadership & People Focus Program Development and Implementation Continuous Improvement through Critical Reflection Communication – Influencing change through collaboration and information sharing
4
5 Year Strategic Plan Excellence in FREP Development and implementation: Budget and capacity Quality Service Information Management Implementation Training Linkages
5
5 Year Strategic Plan Critical reflection and Continuous Improvement: Communication – Influencing change by sharing information Closing the loop – turning lessons into practice (specific mechanisms) Reporting Information gathering Stakeholder input Partnerships Professional accountability Filling the knowledge gap Effecting change in the Forest Practices Framework
6
5 Year Strategic Plan 2007/08 service plan deliverables: % achievement of monitoring targets completed by districts % of FRPA values with measurable indicators for FREP monitoring and evaluation Number of intensive evaluation projects conducted based on RSM red flags and/or other documented priority setting procedures
7
5 Year Strategic Plan
8
Implementation Plan What is an implementation plan? Identifies: When and how a resource value checklist will be implemented Resources allocated and resources needed to implement the FREP program Priorities Why is it being done? Coordinate program implementation amongst Resource Value Team Leaders (RVTL) Strategize resources Perception that RSM implementation might overwhelm district resources Districts wanted to know how FREP would unfold
9
Implementation Plan How was the plan created? Surveys District Survey RVTL Survey/Interview Data analysis Analyse and compare the data between District input and RVTL expectations Analyse and compare the data with provincial needs, priority questions and allocation to ensure the best use of the resources
10
District Survey Checklist # Blocks or Steams Sampled Training Days by Checklist (Include all staff) Estimated P- Days for Field Work (Include Travel Time) Estimated P- Days for Office/Field Preparation Estimated P- Days Contribution for FREP (e.g. CI workshop, FREP IMS) # Staff Involved in RSM Riparian153 (3)23.4616 Stand-Level Biodiversity151 (3)27.4916 Water Quality 1 Soils 1 Karst 1 Other (please specify) TOTAL154 (3)50.81526 District: KALUM Region: NORTHERN INTERIOR
11
RVTL Survey/Interview Collected and/or confirmed the following information: Objective/Question Team members Status Crew size, person-days requirement, training, skills and knowledge, supporting information Current/future project or research
12
FREP Implementation Plan Analysis assumptions: 1 Person Day = 7 hours 261 Person Days/Year
13
FTE Requirements (MoFR)
14
Resource Value Checklist Implementation Schedule
15
Implementation Plan District surveys Provincial and regional averages and ranges Included in the binder For information and self-assessment Will not be included in the Strategy document Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.