Download presentation
1
Stanford Prison Experiment
2
Background Landmark psychological study of the human response to captivity. Conducted in 1971 Led by Philip Zimbardo of Stanford University. Volunteers played the roles of the guards and prisoners.
3
Funded by the U.S Navy to explain conflicts in its and the Marine Corps’ prison systems
4
Hypothesis Prison guards and convicts were self –selecting that would naturally lead to poor conditions in that situation.
5
Participants Recruited via a newspaper ad Offered $15 a day
Participate in a mock prison simulation for 2 weeks 24 were chosen based on a series of tests that proved they were the most psychologically stable and healthy. White, middle class, young males.
6
Roles Divided in half into equal groups of prisoners and guards.
Coin toss
7
Prison Mock jail Basement of Stanford Psych. Dept
Research Assistant was the “Warden” Zimbardo was the “Superintendent”
8
Goals Depersonalization Deindividualization Disorientation
9
Guards Wooden Batons, military style uniforms and mirrored sunglasses.
Work in shifts and return home during off hours. Given no formal guidelines except that they were not allowed to touch the prisoners.
11
Prisoners ill fitting smocks (no underwear) Sandals
Assigned #’s –no names Nylon pantyhose caps Small chain around ankles
13
The Beginning Participants were charged with armed robbery by real police officers. Fingerprinting, mug shots, strip searched and deloused.
14
Results Prisoners suffered sadistic and humiliating treatment.
Developed severe emotional disturbances (crying and disorganized thinking). Riots Strenuous punishments were imposed. (i.e. push-ups) Prison became unsanitary and bathroom rights became privileges.
16
Results (cont) Clean toilets with bare hands.
Sleep on concrete floor naked. Denied food. Guards became more and more sadistic.
18
The End After only 6 days the experiment was shut down!!
19
Conclusions Argued to demonstrate obedience of people and power of authority. Situation caused the behavior not inherent personalities. Compared to Miligram experiment.
20
Criticisms Unethical Results cannot be reproduced or replicated
Zimbardo was not a neutral observer Not like an actual prison Sample size was too small People who were drawn to the ad in the newspaper, may be predisposition for violent behavior.
21
Questions Was it right to trade suffering experienced by the participants for the knowledge gained by the research? Why or why not? If you were an experimenter in charge, would you have done this study? How could you have made the study more ethical?
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.