Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Discuss the following: 1. How far would you go to get a story? What would you do if you were told your life was in danger?

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Discuss the following: 1. How far would you go to get a story? What would you do if you were told your life was in danger?"— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Discuss the following: 1. How far would you go to get a story? What would you do if you were told your life was in danger?

3  3 main components 1. The use of multiple sources/many interviews 2. Extensive research 3. Confirming facts or fact checking

4 “It’s about keeping our word for 30 years. The process of reporting involves having those sources that will say, ‘Here’s what’s really going on.’ ” – Woodward “There are people in this country that would know virtually nothing about their government if it weren’t for confidential sources.” - Bernstein

5  It protects a source’s job  It protects a source’s life  It is the only way to get the information

6 “We as journalists enter into agreement that we won’t reveal their identity as long as their information is truthful. If we were to break that pledge, our work as a reporter would be over.” – Bernstein “The process it to check and doublecheck. When you use an unnamed source, it’s all on your shoulders.” – Woodward

7 1. Keep your promise & protect their identity 2. Fact check all information they give you

8  What does Bernstein say are the lessons that can be learned from Watergate?  Be careful  Use multiple sources  Put information in context  Don’t be swayed by gossip or sensationalism or manufactured controversy

9  The right to not reveal confidential sources, notes, tapes or photos, etc. in connection with the litigation of a case.  Used when journalists are called on to testify in a court of law as an innocent third party (subpoenaed in civil or criminal cases)

10 2 journalists were called to testify against the Black Panthers organization (had infiltrated and written stories about) 1 journalist had infiltrated and written about organized crime in Kentucky They were all called to testify before a grand jury but refused to reveal their notes and sources Refusing to testify results in jail time and fines Case goes to Supreme Court

11  Revealing source’s name might put that source in danger or put the reporter in danger  Revealing a source’s name might cost them their job  It is difficult to get anyone else to talk to you when you revoke a promise of confidentiality  It could have a chilling effect on investigative reporting itself

12  It could become a force of harassment, Ex: cops calling journalists to testify just to cause them trouble after a police- negative story  The press is separate from the government and should remain so – if reporters are used in this way, they become like an investigative arm of law enforcement

13  Journalists lost 5 – 4 so there is no national law protecting anonymous sources (or journalist’s privilege)  Determining who qualifies as a journalist?  Some justices agreed that there should be journalist’s privilege sometimes (Justice Stewart’s dissent)

14 Plaintiffs have to prove 3 things for a journalist to be forced to reveal his/her sources 1. That the Journalist has relevant information 2. That the government (or plaintiff) has a compelling and overriding interest in it 3. That there is no other way to obtain that information. Formed the basis for most state shield laws

15  Laws explaining under which circumstances a journalist must reveal confidential sources and when they may keep that information to themselves  State laws are generally stronger than the federal law  36 states have shield laws  http://www.dmlp.org/legal-guide/texas- protections-sources-and-source-material

16  Passed on May 13, 2009 – the Free Flow of Information Act  Protects Texas journalists from being forced to disclose or testify about their confidential sources  Provides qualified privilege, not absolute (meaning there are specific circumstances in which privilege can be overcome)

17  Law would require that an independent judge review all police and court orders demanding that reporters turn over their notes or identify their sources  Not be protected if they knew their source had committed a felony or if the information could prevent certain death or bodily harm to an individual

18  People who get a significant portion of income from news gathering  Not independent bloggers

19  Deep Throat revealed himself in June/July 2006  W. Mark Felt – the deputy director of the FBI  His family revealed his identity through a Vanity Fair article when he was 91 years old  Woodward met Felt when he was a Navy courier  Passed away in December 2008  Interview with Woodward on Washington Post website.

20  How does 2013 amendment to Free Flow of Information Act impact Texas journalists?  Are there any changes from 2009? If so, what?  Who is covered as a journalist?  What protections are they given?  Is it federal protection? Or state protected? http://www.dmlp.org/legal- guide/texas-protections- sources-and-source-material


Download ppt "Discuss the following: 1. How far would you go to get a story? What would you do if you were told your life was in danger?"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google