1. Agriculture Department
Double Digit Growth
Agriculture Department
Mandal : Thondur
Year :

2. Thondur Mandal Map

3. Thondur : Mandal profile
S.No
Particulars
Unit
Area 1
Total Geographic Area Ha
25686 2
Forest Area
1931 3
Barren & Uncultivable area
3863 4
Cultivable waste
1515 5
Permanent Pastures& Other grazing lands 6
Area under orchards
750 7
Fallow Lands
1718 8
No.of.Villages/Gram Panchayats No 15 9
No.of. Revenue Villages 17 10
Agriculture families
a)Small Farmers
No /ha
3370
b)Marginal Farmers
No / ha
1959
c)Others
No/ ha
3257

4. Agriculture
Growth Engines
Groundnut
Bengalgram
Cotton
Sesamum
Jowar

5. Productivity in Kgs./Ha
3. Normal Areas,Production &Productivity of crops ( for last 2 yrs) &
Mandal: Thondur
S.No
Crop
Area in Ha
Productivity in Kgs./Ha
Production in MTs.
GVA in Crs. 1
Groundnut
2254
1175
2648
11.9
1185
925
1096
4.93 2
Cotton
3805
350
1332
5.66
2675
766
2049
8.71 3
Bengalgram
3920
963
3775
14.4
1204
562
677
2.57 4
Maize 20
7048
141
0.2 5
Sunflower
2712
965
2617
10.5
1266
545
690
2.76 6
Jowar
616
1250
1170
1.23
260
780
203
0.32 7
Sesamum
258
365 94
0.15 8
Other Crops
239
145
0.56
230
160
0.62

6. Productivity in Kgs./Ha
4. Area, Production& Productivity of targets of Growth Engines for
Mandal: Thondur
S.No
Crop
Net Increases
Area in Ha
Productivity in Kgs./Ha
Production in MTs.
GVA in Crs. 1
Groundnut
1185
925
1096
4.93
2254
1156
2606
11.73
1069
231
1510
6.8 2
Cotton
2675
766
2049
8.71
2950
770
2272
9.66
275 4
223
0.95 3
Bengalgram
1204
562
677
2.57
2550
880
2244
8.53
1346
318
1567
5.96
Sunflower
1266
545
690
2.76
1498
850
1273
5.09
232
305
583
2.33 5
Jowar
260
780
203
0.32
309
1768
547
0.88 49
988
344
0.56
Sesamum
258
365 94
0.15
380 98
0.53 15
0.38 7
Other Crops
230
160
0.62
239
145 9
-15
-0.06

7. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal : Thondur
Crop : Bengalgram
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area(Ha)
Production ( MT)
Productvity(Kgs per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
1204
677
562
2.57
2550
2244
880
8.53
Net Increase
1346
1567
318
5.96
Interventions
Seed replacement
2. Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
3. Integrated pest management (IPM)
4. Farm Mechanization
5. Area proposed of previous year brought under cultivation

8. 1
Seed Replacement a
Area Proposed under Seed Replacement Ha
1204 b
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Subsidy seed
Rs. /ha
500 c
Total cost reduction due to supply of subsidy seed
Rs. In Crs
0.0602 d
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
0.8 e
Total Yield Increase
963.2 f
Benefit due to Yield increase g
Net benefit due to Seed Replacement h
Net benefit to the farmer due to seed replacement per Ha
3300 2
Integrated Nutrient Management A
Macro Nutrient application
Area Proposed under INM
NPK as per recommended dose
2444
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usage
3737
Cost reduce per Ha due adopting of INM Macro Nutient application
1293
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application
0.6
722.4 I
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application j
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient application per Ha
3393

9. B
Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate) a
Area Proposed under Zinc Sulphate Application Ha
200 b
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Zinc Suplhate under Subsidy Pattern
Rs. /ha
790 c
Total cost reduction due to supply of Zinc Sulphate under Subsidy Pattern
Rs. In Crs
0.0158 d
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
0.5 e
Total Yield Increase
100 f
Benefit due to Yield increase
0.035 g
Net benefit due to Zinc Sulphate application
0.0508 h
Net benefit to the farmer due to Zinc Sulphate application per Ha
2540 3
Integrated Pest Management
Adpoting of IPM
Area Proposed under IPM Application
1204
IPM as per recommended dose
3523
Farmer Practice usage
7100
Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM
3577
Total benefit on IPM application
0.6
722.4 i
Net benefit due to IPM application j
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha
5677

10. 4
FYM application a
Area Proposed under FYM Application Ha
1204 b
Cost increaseper Ha due to FYM application
Rs. /ha
2500 c
Total benefit on FYM application
Rs. In Crs
0.301 d
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls. 1 e
Total Yield Increase f
Benefit due to Yield increase
0.4214 g
Net benefit due to FYM application
0.1204 h
Net benefit to the farmer due to FYM application per Ha
1000
Farm Mechanisation
Area Proposed under Farm Mechanisation Application
2380
Cost reduction per Ha due to Rotavator& Ferti cum Seed drill & Tractor mounted sprayer and MCT.
Cost reduction due to FM implementaion on Labour
0.595
0.4
952
0.3332
Net benefit due to FM
0.9282
Net benefit to the farmer due to FM per Ha
3900

11. 5
Increase of Area a
Area proopsed to be increase Ha
1095 b
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
8.8 c
Total Yield Increase
9636 d
Benefit due to Yield increase
Rs. In Crs
3.3726 e
Net benefit due to additional area
SUMMARY
Total area proposed
2299
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions
Rs. /ha
5370
Net bebifit to the farmers due to interventions
19810
Total value increase
5.96

12. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal : Thondur
Crop : Cotton
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area(Ha)
Production ( MT)
Productvity (Kgs.per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
2675
2049
766
8.71
2950
2272
770
9.66
Net Increase
275
223 4
0.95
Interventions
1.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Boron)
2. Integrated pest management (IPM)

13. 1
Integrated Nutrient Management A
Macro Nutrient application a
Area Proposed under INM Ha b
NPK as per recommended dose
Rs. /ha c
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usage d
Cost reduce per Ha due adopting of INM Macro Nutient application e
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application
Rs. In Crs
0.19 f
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
0.30 g
Total Yield Increase
465.00 h
Benefit due to Yield increase i
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application
0.38 j
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient application per Ha B
Micro Nutrient application (Boron)
Area Proposed under Boron Application
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Boron under Subsidy Pattern
135.00
Total cost reduction due to supply of Boron under Subsidy Pattern
0.01
0.20
200.00
0.08
Net benefit due to Boron application
0.09
Net benefit to the farmer due to Boron application per Ha
945.00

14. 2
Integrated Pest Management
Adpoting of IPM a
Area Proposed under IPM Application Ha b
IPM as per recommended dose
Rs. /ha c
Farmer Practice usage d
Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM e
Total benefit on IPM application
Rs. In Crs
0.40 f
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
0.20 g
Total Yield Increase
204.00 h
Benefit due to Yield increase
0.08 i
Net benefit due to IPM application
0.48 j
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha
SUMMARY
0.00
Total area proposed ha
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions
Net bebifit to the farmers due to interventions
Total value increase
0.95

15. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal : Thondur
Crop : Groundnut
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area(Ha)
Production (MT)
Productvity (Kgs. per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
1185
1096
925
4.93
2254
2606
1156
11.73
Net Increase
1069
1510
231
6.80
Interventions
Seed replacement
Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a) Macro Nutrient Management
b) Micro Nutrient application (Gypsum)
Farm Yard Manure
Integrated Pest Management (IPM)
Area of previous year brought under cultivation

16. 1
Seed Replacement a
Area Proposed under Seed Replacement Ha b
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Subsidy seed
Rs. /ha c
Total cost reduction due to supply of subsidy seed
Rs. In Crs
0.32 d
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
0.72 e
Total Yield Increase
853.20 f
Benefit due to Yield increase
0.51 g
Net benefit due to Seed Replacement
0.83 h
Net benefit to the farmer due to seed replacement per Ha 2
Integrated Nutrient Management
0.00 A
Macro Nutrient application
Area Proposed under INM
NPK as per recommended dose
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usage
Cost reduce per Ha due adopting of INM Macro Nutient application
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application
0.23
0.50
592.50
0.36 i
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application
0.58 j
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient application per Ha

17. B
Micro Nutrient application (GYPSUM) a
Area Proposed under Gypsum Application Ha b
Cost increse per Ha due to supply of Gypsum under Subsidy Pattern
Rs. /ha c
Total cost reduction due to supply of Gypsum under Subsidy Pattern
Rs. In Crs
0.21 d
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
0.50 e
Total Yield Increase
592.50 f
Benefit due to Yield increase
0.36 g
Net benefit due to Gypsum application
0.57 h
Net benefit to the farmer due to Gypsum application per Ha 3
FYM application
0.00
Area Proposed under FYM Application
Cost increaseper Ha due to FYM application
Total benefit on FYM application
0.30
Net benefit due to FYM application
0.06
Net benefit to the farmer due to FYM application per Ha
500.00

18. 4
Integrated Pest Management
Adpoting of IPM a
Area Proposed under IPM Application Ha b
IPM as per recommended dose
Rs. /ha c
Farmer Practice usage d
Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM
935.00 e
Total benefit on IPM application
Rs. In Crs
0.11 f
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
0.50 g
Total Yield Increase
592.50 h
Benefit due to Yield increase
0.36 i
Net benefit due to IPM application
0.47 j
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha 5
Increase of Area
0.00
Area proopsed to be increase
6.70
4.30
Net benefit due to additional area
SUMMARY
Total area proposed
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions
2840
Net bebifit to the farmers
21158
Total value increase
6.80

19. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal: Thondur
Crop : Jowar
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area(Ha)
Production (MT)
Productvity (Kgs.per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
260
203
780
0.32
309
547
1768
0.88
Net Increase 49
344
988
0.56
Interventions
1.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
2. Integrated pest management (IPM)

20. 1
Integrated Nutrient Management A
Macro Nutrient application a
Area Proposed under INM Ha
309.00 b
NPK as per recommended dose
Rs. /ha c
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usage d
Cost reduce per Ha due adopting of INM Macro Nutient application
956.00 e
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application
Rs. In Crs
0.03 f
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
3.50 g
Total Yield Increase h
Benefit due to Yield increase
0.18 i
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application
0.21 j
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient application per Ha 2
Integrated Pest Management
0.00
Adpoting of IPM
91.00
Area Proposed under IPM Application
395.00
IPM as per recommended dose
Farmer Practice usage
1.50
Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM
136.50
Total benefit on IPM application
0.02
Net benefit due to IPM application
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha

21. 2
Integrated Pest Management
Adpoting of IPM a
Area Proposed under IPM Application Ha
309.00 b
IPM as per recommended dose
Rs. /ha
920.00 c
Farmer Practice usage d
Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM
460.00 e
Total benefit on IPM application
Rs. In Crs
0.01 f
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
3.00 g
Total Yield Increase
927.00 h
Benefit due to Yield increase
0.16 i
Net benefit due to IPM application
0.17 j
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha 3
Increase of Area
Area proopsed to be increase
49.00
18.00
882.00
0.15
Net benefit due to additional area
SUMMARY
Total area proposed
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions
Net bebifit to the farmers due to interventions
Total value increase
0.56

22. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal: Thondur
Crop : Sunflower
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area(Ha)
Production (MT)
Productvity (Kgs. per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores)
1266
690
545
2.76
1498
1273
850
5.09
Net Increase
232
583
305
2.33
Interventions
Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Zinc Sulphate)
2. Integrated pest management (IPM)
3. Farm Mechanization
4. Area of previous year brought under cultivation

23. 1
Integrated Nutrient Management A
Macro Nutrient application a
Area Proposed under INM Ha b
NPK as per recommended dose c
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usage d
Cost reduce per Ha due adopting of INM Macro Nutient application
Rs. /ha e
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application
Rs. In Crs
0.16 f
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
1.50 g
Total Yield Increase h
Benefit due to Yield increase
0.76 i
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application
0.92 j
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient application per Ha B
Micro Nutrient application (Boron)
0.00
Area Proposed under Boron Application
344.00
Cost reduction per Ha due to supply of Boron under Subsidy Pattern
135.00
Total cost reduction due to supply of Boron under Subsidy Pattern
0.50
172.00
0.07
Net benefit due to Boron application
Net benefit to the farmer due to Boron application per Ha

24. 2
Integrated Pest Management
Adpoting of IPM a
Area Proposed under IPM Application Ha b
IPM as per recommended dose c
Farmer Practice usage d
Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM
Rs. /ha e
Total benefit on IPM application
Rs. In Crs
0.17 f
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
1.00 g
Total Yield Increase h
Benefit due to Yield increase
0.48 i
Net benefit due to IPM application
0.65 j
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha 3
Increase of Area
Area proopsed to be increase
232.00
7.00
0.68
Net benefit due to additional area
SUMMARY
Total area proposed
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions
Net bebifit to the farmers due to interventions
Total value increase
2.33

25. Interventions proposed to achieve Double Digit Growth
Mandal : Thondur
Crop : Sesamum
Present and Projected scenario
Year
Area(Ha)
Production ( MT)
Productvity (Kgs.per Ha)
GVA (Rs. In crores) 49 20
412
0.11 22
450
0.12
Net Increase 2 38
0.01
Interventions
1.Integrated Nutrient Management (INM)
a. Macro Nutrient application
b.Micro Nutrient application (Boron)
2. Integrated pest management (IPM)

26. 1
Integrated Nutrient Management A
Macro Nutrient application a
Area Proposed under INM Ha
258.00 b
NPK as per recommended dose
Rs. /ha c
Cost of fertilizer as per farmers usage d
Cost reduce per Ha due adopting of INM Macro Nutient application e
Total benefit on Macro Nutrient application
Rs. In Crs
0.03 f
Yield increase per Ha
Qtls.
1.50 g
Total Yield Increase
387.00 h
Benefit due to Yield increase
0.19 i
Net benefit due to Macro Nutrient application
0.21 j
Net benefit to the farmer due to Macro Nutrient application per Ha 2
Integrated Pest Management
0.00
Adpoting of IPM
Area Proposed under IPM Application
IPM as per recommended dose
Farmer Practice usage
Cost reduction Ha due to adopting of IPM
568.00
Total benefit on IPM application
0.01
1.20
309.60
0.15
Net benefit due to IPM application
0.16
Net benefit to the farmer due to IPM application per Ha
SUMMARY
Total area proposed
Cost reduction /ha due to interventions
Net bebifit to the farmers due to interventions
0.38
Total value increase

27. Remedy to address the problem
Soil Condition
S.No
Problem
Remedy to address the problem 1
Low Organic carbon content in the soil
Raising of legume crops(PULSES) for nitrogen fixation in soil and application of soil amendments like castor cake ,Neem seed kernal extract etc 2
Low nitrogen content in soil
Split application of nitrogenous fertilisers as basal and top dressing and Prevention of nitrogen losses by using neem coated urea 3
Increase in phosphates (P2O5) content in soil
Recommendation of increased use of organic fertiliser and application of phosphorus solubilising bio fertilisers in soil 4
Increase in PH OF SOIL i.e>8.7
Application of Gypsum at an average of 500 kg /acre 5
Decerese in PH i.e <4.00
Application of lime at an average of 600 to 1200 Kg/acre 6
Micronutrient deficiency for zinc and iron elements
Application of the respective Micronutrient fertiliser 7
Increase in Electrical conductivity
Managing drainage problem in irrigation and leaching of excess salts in soil

28. 5.Soil Health Profile based on soil test results conducted during 2015.
Sl. No.
Component
Target
No.of soil samples collected by MAOs
No.of Soil Sample received to Lab
No.of Soil Sample analysed
Soil Health Cards online
Soil Health Cards distributed 1
Macro
440
226 2
Micro
220
S.No
Particulars
Status 1
Ogranic Carbon
Low
Zinc
90% deficient 2
Nitrogen
Boran
40 % deficient 3
Phosphorous
Medium
Iron
71% deficient 4
Potash
High
Sulphar
31 % deficient

29. Potassium Content in Soils is Very high, hence Farmers recommended not to apply Potassium to Soils apply
of Phosphate as Basal dose only in follow of
recommendations
Apply of Neem coated Urea for increase efficiency of
Nitrogen
As per the analysis reports received Micronutrient
deficiencies observed as detailed Zinc- 90% deficiency,
Iron- 71% deficiency, Sulphure- 31% deficiency, Boron-
40% deficiency.
To correct Micronutrient deficiencies, the following
Micronutrients proposed to Supply by Department of
Agriculture as follows
Zinc targeted area proposed is 291 ha, allotted
5.0mts
Boron targeted area proposed is 1344 ha, allotted
0.92mts
Gypsum targeted area proposed is 1969 ha, allotted 264 MTs

30. 6. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
I Additional Areas:-
Additional Areas under irrigation provided by Irrigation department.:- nil
Areas crop wise targeted by Department of Agriculture:-
Areas crop wise brought under diversification and previous area brought
under cultivation detailed below.
Crop
Bengal gram
Ground nut
Cotton
Sunflower
Total
Area in ha
1346
1069
275
232
2922

31. 6. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)
B) Varietal Replacement plan targeted for :-
Crop
Bengal gram
Remarks
Name of Variety
NBG-3
Seed availability is the major constrain
No. of ha’s proposed
1000
Qty of Seed required in qtls

32. III Soil Health Management
A. Fertilizer requirement as per Normal Areas for last 2 years.
Sno
Year
Mandal Normal area
Urea
DAP
NPK
Other
Total 1
19058
290
358
860
132
1640 2
15510
162
101
552 95
910
B.Actual chemical fertilizer consumed for last 2 years.
Sno
Year
Mandal Normal area
Urea
DAP
NPK
Other
Total
Remarks 1
19058
290
358
860
132
1640
Fertilizer Consumption assumed based on the Fertilizer sales at Mandal level

33. C.As per the targeted area, fertilizer requirement for 2015-16
(as per the soil test based recommendations).
Sno
Year
Mandal Normal area
Urea
DAP
MOP
NPK
SSP
Total 1
16854
850
750
350
1100
110
3160

34. Allocation of Micro Nutrients for the year 2015-16 Sl. No
Name of the Division
Name of the Mandal
Gypsum 42% deficiency
Kharif-15
Rabi-15-16
Area in Ha
Target
Positioned
Distributed 1
Muddanur
Thondur
1644
114 21 2
325
150
Sl. No
Name of the Division
Name of the Mandal
Boron
Boron 40% Deficiency
Total Target
Kharif-15
Rabi-15-16
Basal
Foliar
Area
Target
Positioned
Distributed 1
Muddanur
Thondur
1344
0.920
0.25
1008
0.75 34
0.010
269
0.15
Sl. No
Name of the Division
Name of the Mandal
Zinc Sulphate 65% deficiancy
Total
Kharif-15
Rabi-15-16
Area
Target
Positioned
Distributed
Basal
Foliar 12% 1
Muddanur
Thondur
291 5
233 4 7
0.13

35. D.Saving of fertilizer by following soil test based recommendations.
. Potassium Content in Soils is Very high, hence Farmers recommended not to apply Potassium to Soils.
. Apply of Phosphate as Basal dose only in follow of Recommendations.
. Apply of Neem coated Urea for increase of efficiency
E.Micro nutrient deficiency in Normal areas and targets F. Problematic soils like Saline, Alkaline, salt etc. and areas and measures taken for reclamation (quantify Nil).

36. IV Good Agricultural Practices
Detailed good agronomical practices to be adopted crop wise.
Groundnut:- Seed Treatment with T.viridae-8-10g/kg of Seed
. Basal application of Zinc 50kgs /ha
. Gypsum application at peg penetrtion Mechanized Harvesting
Cotton:- Seed treatment with Imidacloprid -48%- 7gms/kg
.Basal application of Zinc-50kg/ha, Boron-2.5kg/ha, Magnesium-
10kg/ha
Application of Fertilizer within 90DAS
.Stem application method within 60DAS
. Inter cropping with Redgram crop
. To reduce pesticide consumption sowing of Non-Bt cotton.

37. IV Good Agricultural Practices
3.Bengal gram:- .Seed treatment with T.viridae-8-10g/kg of Seed./
Hexaconazole-2ml/kg of seed
. Inter cropping with ratio
Highlight locally adopted best agronomical practices and
indigenously developed practices.:- Nil
Crop sequence:- 1. Groundnut- coriander, 2.Cotton-Pulses(Green gram or Black gram)
Crop rotation: Cotton-Bengal gram
2. Bengal gram- Coriander
Double cropping 1. Groundnut- Pulses
Inter cropping:- 1.Cotton-Redgram

38. IV Good Agricultural Practices
A)Crop Sequence:Groundnut crop sequence with Green gram or sesamum results in increased yields.
B) Crop rotation:with legumes in cereals increases nitrogen fixation and results
in increased yields.
C)Intercropping:Intercropping with castor or cow pea in ground nut reduces
incidence of Spodoptera and leaf eating caterpillars.Intercropping with Red gram
in ground nut provides additional income.Border cropping with Jowar or bajra in
ground nut reduces incidence of Bud necrosis by arresting thrips movement.
D)Double cropping:Ground nut with Sesamum or sorghum will not only reduces
preparation cost for other crop and also reduces pest incidence leads to
increased returns.

39. V Cost Reduction
Strategies and techniques followed to reduce cost of cultivation.
Chemical fertilizer applications (Nitrogen ):- By application of Green manure seed, improves the Fertilizer efficiency, there by reduces the Application of Nitrogenous Fertilizers up to 30%.
Without green manures applies 375kgs/ha, With green manure applies 250kgs/ha.
Pest management.:- Application of Neem oil 3000ppm reduces the Pest infestation.
Promotion of organic pesticides, fertilizers and other botanicals.:- Seed treatment with Pseudomonas, Application of PSB 10kgs/ha,
Application of Weedicide:- Application of Weedicides as pre-emergence and Post-emergence will reduces cost.

40. VI. Extensions and Capacity building
Polam pilusthondhi- schedule detailed information required
ChandrannaRythukshetralu
Sl. No.
Mandal
Date
Village visited
8.30AM to 12.00noon
2.00PM to 5.30PM 1 2 3 4 5
Thonduru
Inaganuru,Paluru
Agaduru, Saanthakovvurru
Sydapuram, Gundlamadugu
Thelluru,Maduru
Udavagandla
Goturu
Mallela,Thonduru 6
Bhadrampalli,Buchupalli
Bodivaripalli 7
Santhakovuru
Paluru 8
Agadur
Inagalur 9
S.Cherlopalli
Yadavavaripalli 10
Gangadevipalli 11
Mallela
Madur 12
Yadavakunta
Balijapalli 13
Buchupalli

41. VI. Extensions and Capacity building
Sl. No.
Mandal
Date
Village visited
8.30AM to 12.00noon
2.00PM to 5.30PM 1 2 3 4 5 14
Thonduru
Gotur
Thimmapurampeta 15
Bhadrapalli
B.Kothapalli 16
Teluru
Thummalapalli 17
Thondur
Koravanipalli 18
Sydapuram
Jalaparthi 19
Ganganapalli
Pothulapalli 20
Gundlamadugu
Krishnamgaripalli 21
Santhakovuru
Paluru 22
Agadur
Inagalur 23
S.Cherlopalli
Yadavavaripalli 24
Udavagandla
Gangadevipalli 25
Mallela
Madur 26
Yadavakunta
Balijapalli

42. VI. Extensions and Capacity building
Sl. No.
Mandal
Date
Village visited
8.30AM to 12.00noon
2.00PM to 5.30PM 1 2 3 4 5 27
Thonduru
Buchupalli
Bodivaripalli 28
Gotur
Thimmapurampeta 29
Bhadrapalli
B.Kothapalli 30
Teluru
T.Thummalapalli 31
Thondur
Koravanipalli 32
Sydapuram
Jalaparthi 33
Ganganapalli
Pothulapalli 34
Gundlamadugu
Krishnamgaripalli 35
Santhakovuru
Paluru 36
Agadur
Inagalur 37
S.Cherlopalli
Yadavavaripalli 38
Udavagandla
Gangadevipalli 39
Mallela
Madur

43. Statement showing the details of CRKs proposals in Thondur for the Year 2015-16
Sl. No.
Division
Mandal
Area covered under Chandranna Rythu Kshetralu in Ha
Total CRK Division Wise
Paddy
Maize
Bengal Gram
Cotton (Kappas)
Ground Nut
Sunflower
Sesamum
Jowar
Other crops 1
Muddanur
Thondur 10 20

44. VI. Extensions and Capacity building
Special awareness programs and trainings conducted to MPEOs and Farmers in highlighting cost reduction and promotion of Natural Farming.:- Trainings organized on Organic Farming in Co-ordination with Scientists from KVK, ARS, DAATT center.
Identification of Best Adoptive Farmers as Master Trainers.:-
Involvement RMGs, SHGs, NGOs & other Organisations.
Exposure of farmers to CMSA villages.

45. Farm Mechanisation Farm machinery- item wise required to cover 100%.:-
Rotavators-20no.s, 9-Tyne cultivators-45 no.s, 7-Tyne Cultivators-25 no.s, Seed drills-100 no.s, Combined paddy Harvesters- 5no.s, Taiwan sprayers-50no.s, Tarpaulins-500 no.s, MCTs-15no.s, CHC(Cotton)-10no.s, ISS-10No.s
Action plan for supply of farm machinery as per allocation :- Planned In JBMV program and collected implement wise Farmer details. After allotment details intimated to the Farmers.
Cost reduction through farm mechanization .:- Cost is reduced by application of Rotavator up to Rs. 2000/ha, By application of Mechanized harvesting it reduces up to Rs.2200/ha. Use threshing Machinery reduces cost upto Rs.2500/ha.
Enhancement of yields through farm mechanization:- Nil

46. Tractor Drawn Implements 29 2.87 2 Rotavators 4 3
Statement showing the Mandal wise component wise category wisebudget allocation Under NSP during Thonduru Mandal.
S.No
Mandal
Name of the implement
Phy
Fin
Remarks 1
Thonduru
Tractor Drawn Implements 29
2.87 2
Rotavators 4 3
Plant protection equipment 31
1.14
Diesel engines
0.4 5
Power Tiller
0.75 6
Mini Tractors 7
Tarpalins(HDPE)
119
1.48 8
Trapalins(MCL) 18
0.225

47. VIII. IT – Applications
Enrolment of farmers to M-Kissan portal.:- 1. This fastens the advising of the Farmers. 2.This creates awareness on Modern practices 3.
All beneficiary farmers of all schemes of department to be enrolled in M- Kissan.:- 1.This is useful to get the details of Farmers who availed schemes previously 2. This prevents repetition, there by more Farmers availing Scheme benefits.

48. Conclusion:
The Thondur mandal people are mainly depending on Agriculture and majority of the farmers are big and marginal farmers. They cultivating Bengalgram as major rain fed crop for their Livelyhood and also growing paddy, Cotton as a major crops in Kharif.
The soils also having poor organic carbon, low Nitrogen, P2O5 medium and having High K2O and also deficient in micro nutrients such as Zinc. Advocating of farmers through Department personnel adopting Neam Coated Urea and Straight Fertilizers to improve Fertilizere use Efficiency and micronutrients application in all the crops to correct the deficiencies.

49. Conclusion:
The extension staff of the mandal are extensively giving wide publicity though trainings and distributing Phamplets to create awareness to all the farmers on Soil sampling and advantages of soil sampling, duly adopting the Soil test based fertilizer application for all the crops.
The rural poor living standards and economical standards there is a need of technology transfer to the farmer by giving trainings, exposure visits, conducting Demos with increases the capacity building of the individual farmer will increases the confidence Leeds to adopt new practices in future for getting better results. Promoting farm mechanization, organic farming, and application of Bio agents reduce the cost of cultivation and maintains the ecology.
Due to above efforts of the Department the cost benefit ratio of farming community in the mandal has been increased which results in successful achievement of double digit growth for the year