Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

1 Data Validation For the 2006 Census of Agriculture Charlie Arcaro, Statistics Canada ICES III - 20 June, 2007.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "1 Data Validation For the 2006 Census of Agriculture Charlie Arcaro, Statistics Canada ICES III - 20 June, 2007."— Presentation transcript:

1 1 Data Validation For the 2006 Census of Agriculture Charlie Arcaro, Statistics Canada ICES III - 20 June, 2007

2 2 Outline Introduction What is Data Validation? CEAG and Validation Process New Strategies for 2006 Conclusions

3 3 Introduction Census of Agriculture (CEAG) Provides a quinquennial snapshot of Canadian Agriculture Piggyback with Census of Population Collects inventories of farm commodities/financial information Approximately 229K farms & 327K operators in CEAG 2006 Used in redesigning Agricultural surveys Basic sources of sampling frames Intracensal corrections Updating the Farm Register

4 4 What is Data Validation? Major part of data quality evaluation for Census of Agriculture Costliest part of the CEAG process post-collection Analyze and change CEAG data (Sep 2006 to Feb 2007) Data analyzed using both micro and macro level tools Aggregate data at various geographic levels Quality evaluation of small area data Produce reports, make presentations to Certification Committee and recommendations for publication

5 5 CEAG Process Collection Data Scanning Output & Dissemination Editing, Matching, Follow up Imputation Data Validation

6 6 Whats Involved? Senior Validators prepare validation plan based upon knowledge and expectations Number of farms & totals in 2006, Structural changes since 2001 Validation tools on Central Processing System (CPS) Comparison/Match/Distribution tables, Top Contributors, Impact of Processing Compare references sources Validators responsible for many variables Validation done by variables and not questionnaire

7 7 Goals for CEAG Validation 2006 More efficient use of resources Improve data quality at finer geographic level Greater scrutiny expected in 2006

8 8 Validation Tools Comparison Tables Compare data for 2001 and 2006 and % of change Total values, # farms reporting, average reporting value Four geographical levels Look for changes that makes data questionable Use survey data or other sources to justify changes More likely at lower levels of geography

9 9 Validation Tools (cont.) Impact of Processing Tables Assesses the impact made to data during imputation and validation ( Provincial level only) Reports available for all variables No change for 2006

10 10 Validation Tools (cont.) Top Contributor Tables Farm records with highest value for certain geographic areas What to look for Imputed values, Jumps in consecutive values Compare associated variables with main variable Bottom Contributors Greenhouse variables - supposed to report in ft 2 or m 2 Locate capture and response errors

11 11 Validation Tools Top Contributor Tables In 2001… Top 100 farms in each province (default) In 2006… Top 100 farms or top 80% contributors in each province

12 12 Validation Tools Match Tables Compare CEAG data to selected Referential Sources (RS) Three reports are generated In RS not in CEAG, in CEAG not in RS, in both but with significant differences In 2001… Top 100 from each of the 3 match reports (default) In 2006… Using Call Management System (CMS) cutoff algorithm (2% units, 50% cumulative total 1% individual total) Missing CEAG farms > 30% CCS estimate

13 13 Validation Tools Distribution Tables Distribution of variables (Geog. Classification, Category..) Similar to Comparison Tables. Three types: Operator Tables All operators at detailed geography level # of operators, age, sex, job injuries etc…. Livestock Tables Counts and farms sizes for various livestock and poultry (Province level) Other Tables Computer Usage, Land management Data on tick box variables

14 14 Summary of # Farms to be checked for Validation - TCATTL Match Report Parameters - #Units=2%, Cumulative Sum=50%, Unit Cont.=1% - TCATTL Match Top #CCS - Total Farms Total Report Contributor Top CCS Top - Obs AGOPPROV Farms Farms Farms Farms Farms Unduplicated 1 10 59 4 46 18 13 68 2 11 110 3 100 11 6 114 3 12 103 2 100 2 2 104 4 13 122. 100 23 14 123 5 24 304 28 100 209 101 337 6 35 193 78 100 50 27 228 7 46 123 49 100 5 3 154 8 47 147 69 100 16 13 185 9 48 217 171 100 2 2 273 10 59 165 39 100 56 31 195 ===== ====== =========== ======= ====== ============ 1543 993 946 392 212 1781 Estimation Impact of Farms to be checked for Validation - TCATTL ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ VALIDSTATUS ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Checked Not Checked ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ All TCATTL TCATTL ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒ TCATTL Row Row ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ N Row %N Sum %Sum N Row %N Sum %Sum N Sum ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒ ƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ HDPROV ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 10 59 34.91 7,532 81.70 110 65.09 1,687 18.30 169 9,219 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒ ƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 11 110 10.30 31,398 37.21 958 89.70 52,981 62.79 1,068 84,379 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒ ƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 12 103 6.03 30,194 27.93 1,604 93.97 77,895 72.07 1,707 108,089 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒ ƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 13 122 8.59 27,185 29.90 1,299 91.41 63,725 70.10 1,421 90,910 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒ ƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 24 304 1.89 119,186 8.69 15,797 98.11 1,252,855 91.31 16,101 1,372,041 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒ ƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 35 193 0.68 272,994 12.21 28,099 99.32 1,963,652 87.79 28,237 2,236,646 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒ ƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 46 123 1.08 149,619 10.46 11,242 98.92 1,281,057 89.54 11,365 1,430,676 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒ ƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 47 147 0.65 351,040 11.69 22,481 99.35 2,653,138 88.31 22,628 3,004,178 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒ ƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 48 217 0.68 1,468,421 22.11 31,593 99.32 5,174,387 77.89 31,810 6,642,808 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒ ƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 59 165 2.13 204,398 25.22 7,594 97.87 606,131 74.78 7,759 810,529 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒ ƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ All 1,543 1.26 2,661,967 16.86120,722 98.74 13,127,508 83.14122,265 15,789,475 Šƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒŒ Summary of # Farms to be checked for Validation - TCATTL Match Report Parameters - #Units=2%, Cumulative Sum=50%, Unit Cont.=1% - TCATTL Match Top #CCS - Total Farms Total Report Contributor Top CCS Top - Obs AGOPPROV Farms Farms Farms Farms Farms Unduplicated 1 10 59 4 46 18 13 68 2 11 110 3 100 11 6 114 3 12 103 2 100 2 2 104 4 13 122. 100 23 14 123 5 24 304 28 100 209 101 337 6 35 193 78 100 50 27 228 7 46 123 49 100 5 3 154 8 47 147 69 100 16 13 185 9 48 217 171 100 2 2 273 10 59 165 39 100 56 31 195 ===== ====== =========== ======= ====== ============ 1543 993 946 392 212 1781 Estimation Impact of Farms to be checked for Validation - TCATTL ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ VALIDSTATUS ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Checked Not Checked ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ All TCATTL TCATTL ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒ TCATTL Row Row ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ N Row %N Sum %Sum N Row %N Sum %Sum N Sum ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ HDPROV ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 10 59 34.91 7,532 81.70 110 65.09 1,687 18.30 169 9,219 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 11 110 10.30 31,398 37.21 958 89.70 52,981 62.79 1,068 84,379 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 12 103 6.03 30,194 27.93 1,604 93.97 77,895 72.07 1,707 108,089 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 13 122 8.59 27,185 29.90 1,299 91.41 63,725 70.10 1,421 90,910 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 24 304 1.89 119,186 8.69 15,797 98.11 1,252,855 91.31 16,101 1,372,041 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 35 193 0.68 272,994 12.21 28,099 99.32 1,963,652 87.79 28,237 2,236,646 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 46 123 1.08 149,619 10.46 11,242 98.92 1,281,057 89.54 11,365 1,430,676 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 47 147 0.65 351,040 11.69 22,481 99.35 2,653,138 88.31 22,628 3,004,178 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 48 217 0.68 1,468,421 22.11 31,593 99.32 5,174,387 77.89 31,810 6,642,808 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 59 165 2.13 204,398 25.22 7,594 97.87 606,131 74.78 7,759 810,529 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ All 1,543 1.26 2,661,967 16.86120,722 98.74 13,127,508 83.14122,265 15,789,475 ŠƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒŒ Results for CEAG 2006 Total Cattle (TCATTL) – 109,920 Farms # Validated % Farms Total %Total New Methods 1,551 1.41% 3,346,211 20.15 Previous Methods 2,928 2.66% 3,992,312 20.73 Alfalfa (ALFALFA) – 88,064 Farms # Validated % Farms Total %Total New Methods 1,916 2.18% 1,220,928 9.62 Previous Methods 2,562 2.91% 1,187, 804 9.36 Total Pigs (TOPIGS) – 11,506 Farms # Validated % Farms Total %Total New Methods 1,466 12.74% 7,018,275 45.71 Previous Methods 2,808 24.40% 7,255,827 47.25

15 15 Conclusions Summary of # Farms to be checked for Validation - TCATTL Match Report Parameters - #Units=2%, Cumulative Sum=50%, Unit Cont.=1% - TCATTL Match Top #CCS - Total Farms Total Report Contributor Top CCS Top - Obs AGOPPROV Farms Farms Farms Farms Farms Unduplicated 1 10 59 4 46 18 13 68 2 11 110 3 100 11 6 114 3 12 103 2 100 2 2 104 4 13 122. 100 23 14 123 5 24 304 28 100 209 101 337 6 35 193 78 100 50 27 228 7 46 123 49 100 5 3 154 8 47 147 69 100 16 13 185 9 48 217 171 100 2 2 273 10 59 165 39 100 56 31 195 ===== ====== =========== ======= ====== ============ 1543 993 946 392 212 1781 Estimation Impact of Farms to be checked for Validation - TCATTL ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ VALIDSTATUS ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Checked Not Checked ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ All TCATTL TCATTL ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒ TCATTL Row Row ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ N Row %N Sum %Sum N Row %N Sum %Sum N Sum ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ HDPROV ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 10 59 34.91 7,532 81.70 110 65.09 1,687 18.30 169 9,219 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 11 110 10.30 31,398 37.21 958 89.70 52,981 62.79 1,068 84,379 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 12 103 6.03 30,194 27.93 1,604 93.97 77,895 72.07 1,707 108,089 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 13 122 8.59 27,185 29.90 1,299 91.41 63,725 70.10 1,421 90,910 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 24 304 1.89 119,186 8.69 15,797 98.11 1,252,855 91.31 16,101 1,372,041 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 35 193 0.68 272,994 12.21 28,099 99.32 1,963,652 87.79 28,237 2,236,646 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 46 123 1.08 149,619 10.46 11,242 98.92 1,281,057 89.54 11,365 1,430,676 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 47 147 0.65 351,040 11.69 22,481 99.35 2,653,138 88.31 22,628 3,004,178 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 48 217 0.68 1,468,421 22.11 31,593 99.32 5,174,387 77.89 31,810 6,642,808 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 59 165 2.13 204,398 25.22 7,594 97.87 606,131 74.78 7,759 810,529 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ All 1,543 1.26 2,661,967 16.86120,722 98.74 13,127,508 83.14122,265 15,789,475 ŠƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒŒ How much validation is enough? More focused and structured approach to Validation Process Reduced work without quality compromise

16 16 Contact Details Summary of # Farms to be checked for Validation - TCATTL Match Report Parameters - #Units=2%, Cumulative Sum=50%, Unit Cont.=1% - TCATTL Match Top #CCS - Total Farms Total Report Contributor Top CCS Top - Obs AGOPPROV Farms Farms Farms Farms Farms Unduplicated 1 10 59 4 46 18 13 68 2 11 110 3 100 11 6 114 3 12 103 2 100 2 2 104 4 13 122. 100 23 14 123 5 24 304 28 100 209 101 337 6 35 193 78 100 50 27 228 7 46 123 49 100 5 3 154 8 47 147 69 100 16 13 185 9 48 217 171 100 2 2 273 10 59 165 39 100 56 31 195 ===== ====== =========== ======= ====== ============ 1543 993 946 392 212 1781 Estimation Impact of Farms to be checked for Validation - TCATTL ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ VALIDSTATUS ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ Checked Not Checked ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ All TCATTL TCATTL ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒ TCATTL Row Row ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ…ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ N Row %N Sum %Sum N Row %N Sum %Sum N Sum ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ HDPROV ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 10 59 34.91 7,532 81.70 110 65.09 1,687 18.30 169 9,219 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 11 110 10.30 31,398 37.21 958 89.70 52,981 62.79 1,068 84,379 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 12 103 6.03 30,194 27.93 1,604 93.97 77,895 72.07 1,707 108,089 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 13 122 8.59 27,185 29.90 1,299 91.41 63,725 70.10 1,421 90,910 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 24 304 1.89 119,186 8.69 15,797 98.11 1,252,855 91.31 16,101 1,372,041 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 35 193 0.68 272,994 12.21 28,099 99.32 1,963,652 87.79 28,237 2,236,646 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 46 123 1.08 149,619 10.46 11,242 98.92 1,281,057 89.54 11,365 1,430,676 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 47 147 0.65 351,040 11.69 22,481 99.35 2,653,138 88.31 22,628 3,004,178 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 48 217 0.68 1,468,421 22.11 31,593 99.32 5,174,387 77.89 31,810 6,642,808 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ 59 165 2.13 204,398 25.22 7,594 97.87 606,131 74.78 7,759 810,529 ƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒˆƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒ All 1,543 1.26 2,661,967 16.86120,722 98.74 13,127,508 83.14122,265 15,789,475 ŠƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒƒŒ If you have any Si vous avez plus de further questions questions Charlie Arcaro Phone (613) 951-7087 Charlie.Arcaro@statcan.ca Visit our website / Visitez notre site: www.statcan.ca


Download ppt "1 Data Validation For the 2006 Census of Agriculture Charlie Arcaro, Statistics Canada ICES III - 20 June, 2007."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google