1. Department of Energy Office of Science 1 Sisyphus, founder of Corinth, was condemned to an eternity of rolling a boulder uphill then watching it roll back down again, for broadcasting the location of Zeus’ latest concubine. And some political advice ?? His greatest triumph came when the Hades came to claim him personally for the kingdom of the dead. Hades had brought along a pair of handcuffs, a comparative novelty, and Sisyphus expressed such an interest that Hades was persuaded to demonstrate their use - on himself. DOE Outlook for ILC Lots that could have gone wrong hasn’t! We continue to push the boulder up the Hill P. Grannis, LCFOA 10/16/06

2. Department of Energy Office of Science 2 The ILC perspective The ILC has been endorsed as the highest priority new facility after the LHC by panels worldwide: EPP2010 Report “The US should launch a major program of R&D, design, industrialization, and management and financing studies of the ILC. Secretary Bodman at FNAL, April 2006: “I fully support the possibility of bringing the International Linear Collider to this Lab. … it is a goal worth fighting for. This may turn out to be the most profound new science that we will be seeing in our lifetime.” CERN Council European strategy: “It is fundamental to complement the results of the LHC with measurements at a linear collider.” Federation of (Japanese) Diet members to promote the realization of ILC … “As an important international project in the fundamental sciences, the Federation decided to give strong support toward the realization of the ILC.”

3. Department of Energy Office of Science 3 P5 (Particle Physics Program Priority Panel): 1. LHC is our most important near term project. 2. Highest priority for investments toward the future is ILC. Need to participate vigorously in the international R&D. New investments: ~60% ILC and 40% dark matter, dark energy, neutrinos. HEPAP recommendations Advanced Accelerator Research and Development panel:  Early industrial involvement in design and optimization for large- scale mass production is critical and should be supported.  Recommend that OHEP and NSF build healthy program to address the fundamental issues of SRF and cavity properties, materials and surface science.  Increase long-term accelerator science funding to 6% of total

4. Department of Energy Office of Science 4 DOE Funding for the ILC DOE recognizes that the R&D phase of the ILC will require significant expenditures. The funding levels have been rising, after several years of capped budgets:  FY05: $23.7M  FY06: $30M  FY07(President’s budget): $60M House markup: same as President’s budget Senate mark: take $15M from ILC to Dark Energy research, and remove $8.3M to new Office of High Energy Density Physics (e.g. plasma acceleration research). No appropriation until after election – continuing resolution at FY06 level.  The FY08 budget is now under discussion in Administration

5. Department of Energy Office of Science 5 DOE Funding for the ILC The DOE Office of Science is working actively to establish funding and program direction for the R&D phase of the ILC, and to understand what is needed to make the US a credible choice for hosting it. Starting in FY07 (if at President’s budget level), the ILC funds are expected to cover all ILC-specific activities – laboratory ILC R&D, university grants for directed ILC accelerator research, ILC detector R&D, and support of the GDE. In past, the ILC funds have been supplemented at the laboratories by operations funds for generic research and infrastructure that could also benefit ILC, and this will continue. In future, DOE would like to open a new category of funding for Superconducting RF R&D and Infrastructure.

6. Department of Energy Office of Science 6  New generation of light sources for research in biology, plasmas, materials, environmental studies, chemistry.  Efficient energy recovery linacs (for materials and nuclear science)  Rare isotope accelerators (for nuclear science and astrophysics)  Compact proton linacs (neutron sources, neutrino beams) CATEGORY OF ACCELERATORS WORLD # Basic research ~250 Medical radioisotope production ~200 Radiotherapy>7500 Biomedical studies~1000 Industrial processing ~1500 Ion Implantation, surface modification>7000 ESTIMATED TOTAL >17,500 Accelerators have transformed society broadly in past. SCRF will likely find new uses in cancer therapy, making radioisotopes, nuclear waste disposal, etc. SCRF R&D SCRF will be the basis for new facilities across the broad spectrum of DOE/SC program. ILC pushes the high gradient technology and industrial development.

7. Department of Energy Office of Science 7 Weld free cavity forming R&DSurface polishing/ processing Rinse, bake Vertical / horizontal test Cryomodule assembly String test US lags Europe and Japan Large infrastructure needs and industry procurements Need many cavities to develop process. Purchase needed rf power, CMs cryo, controls. Electropolish Chemical Polish

8. Department of Energy Office of Science 8 China S. Korea Japan India Russia Europe US DOE/NSF Canada Funding Agencies Linear Collider (FALC) oversees ILC, established GDE common fund. Much to do: review cost estimate; document ILC technological benefit; coordinate large world projects; formalize GDE engineering design stage; establish process for site selection. International perspective Current R&D funding levels in Asia, Europe and US are about equal.  ITER organization is good model for ILC

9. Department of Energy Office of Science 9 http://www.science.doe.gov/sbir OHEP program manager: LK Len (lk.len@science.doe.gov) SBIR/STTR Grants What are they?  SBIR = Small Business Innovative Research – need not involve collaboration with labs  STTR = Small Business Technology Transfer – must involve substantial (>30%) collaborative research with labs  Government-wide set-asides (2.5% for SBIR and 0.3% for STTR)  Small Business = 500 or fewer employees  Phase I is for up to $100K for 9 months (feasibility study leading to a Phase II proposal)  Phase II is for up to $750K over two years  Phase III is funded through other sources of funding, e.g., venture capitals, etc. 2007 Phase I proposals due Nov. 21, 2006

10. Department of Energy Office of Science 10 SBIR 2007 http://www.science.doe.gov/sbir/ 29. High Energy Physics Data Acquisition and Processing 30. Accelerator Technology for International Linear Collider a) Superconducting Radiofrequency Systems b) Beam Instrumentation and Feedback Systems c) Magnet and Fast Kicker Technology d) Polarized RF Photocathode Source & Accelerator Magnet Technology 31. Advanced Concepts and Technology for High Energy Accelerators a) New Concepts for Acceleration b) Novel Device and Instrumentation Development c) Inexpensive High Quality Electron Sources d) Computer Software for Control Systems & Advanced Accelerator Modeling 32. RF Accelerator Technology for High Energy Accelerators and Colliders a) Radio Frequency Acceleration Structures b) Radio Frequency Power for Linear Accelerators c) New Concepts/Components - Pulsed Power Modulators and Energy Storage 33. High-Field Superconductor and SC Magnet Technologies for HEP Colliders 34. High Energy Physics Detectors Phase I Topics:

11. Department of Energy Office of Science 11 Summary  The DOE position is that the ILC is our best candidate for a future high energy physics facility and that a vigorous R&D program to develop it is warranted. DOE recognizes that the funding for the R&D phase must continue to ramp up.  The US should seek to host the ILC.  The international collaboration to do the R&D and complete a cost- effective design has been initiated. Much remains to strengthen and internationalize the ILC organization.  The major technical challenges lie in the large scale fabrication of cavities, their assembly into modules, and the rf power systems to drive them. Industrial efforts are key to meeting these challenges.

12. Department of Energy Office of Science 12 Japan STF Comparative spending in Europe, Asia, US FY06 expenditure table? (gerry will do?)

13. Department of Energy Office of Science 13 Importance of Industrialization effort DOE understands that bringing major components to reliable and reproducible fabrication is one of the primary needs for funds in the pre-construction phase. For critical SC rf components, US industry is not yet at the level found in Europe and Japan. For the major cost components, we need all the help from industry we can get to learn how to do these in a cost efficient and reliable way. Your insights and guidance are needed to manage the industrialization effort within the overall budget constraints.

14. Department of Energy Office of Science 14 US regional needs The Linear Collider Steering Group of the Americas has impaneled a group to consider and advise on priorities for those activities which are needed in the US that would support the industrialization and bid to host efforts in the US. Satoshi Ozaki (BNL) is the chair of this panel. We hope for advice that can be folded into the FY07 budget process.

15. Department of Energy Office of Science 15 DOE/NSF Review DOE and NSF conducted a review of the Americas Regional Team Apr. 4 – 6. Major conclusions and recommendations include:  The scope and choice of R&D topics is appropriate. The most pressing R&D need is the demonstration of reliable, reproducible high gradient superconducting cavities.  The baseline design is reasonable, but conservative, and the cost methodology seems appropriate.  The management of the growing US ILC R&D effort should be expanded.

16. Department of Energy Office of Science 16