1. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Inspection 2012 S48 Diocesan Inspection

2. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Agenda The changes in the 2012 Framework Implications for governors

3. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE 2012 changes: why? Reports tell us little about what constitutes good or better quality of Catholic life/RE, why quality and standards are or are not as they should be, or how good schools achieve their outcomes Inspections of individual schools increasingly repetitive – good schools 3 years ago are generally good schools now: reports read the same Self-evaluation now strong in many schools – we need to reflect this in the way we inspect As self evaluation is now strong, inspection often reduced to telling the school what it already knows; rarely any surprises as there were in 1990s

4. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE What change? Ofsted: two forms of inspection – a.inspection of standards and quality which tell us about individual schools b.Surveys of themes or subjects which tell us about standards & quality and about successful and unsuccessful practice across a range of schools s48 inspection 2012 in the diocese will seek to blend the two forms of inspection used by Ofsted

5. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Framework 2012 Looks and is significantly similar to 2009 framework – 3 main judgements Ofsteds48 AchievementOutcomes Quality of teachingProvision L&M Behaviour & Safety Overall effectiveness

6. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Main changes to inspection schedule More emphasis on pupils’ spiritual, moral and vocational development No separate judgement about governors Separate paragraph on community cohesion removed Curriculum requirements re-defined No separate judgement about capacity for sustained improvement Key judgement about the effectiveness of the school’s self evaluation included

7. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Exempt schools Schools judged by Ofsted to be outstanding will be exempt from further inspection – they will not be exempt from s48 and canon law inspection A proportion will be inspected in each of the five years of the inspection cycle, normally five years after the s5 inspection which judged them to be outstanding

8. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Exceptions The Diocesan Education Service reserves the right to inspect schools according to the regulations and framework January 2012 under the following circumstances: A school fails to provide satisfactory evidence of self evaluation Complaints about RE or the Catholic life of the school from a significant number of parents, governors or other stakeholders Persistent and major weaknesses in Catholic life or religious education An inspector’s visit raises major concerns about a school: following support and advice, a full inspection would be undertaken at a later date.

9. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE The new inspection process

10. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Two parts to inspection Inspection – effectiveness of the school judged by validation of the school’s self evaluation Survey – gathering of thematic and subject evidence

11. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Judgements Inspectors will not directly make judgements about the school, about the quality of RE and Catholic life They will seek to validate the school’s judgements about itself This will be by a.evaluating the SSE (SEF) b.Testing aspects of it in school through observations, interviews, work scrutiny

12. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Reporting Report will be written with two sections a.Quality of the school self evaluation b.Judgements about the rest of the required elements in the framework in conformity with the school’s own judgements if the self evaluation is judged to be reliable

13. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Reports The report arising from this kind of inspection is necessarily technical Intended for schools not parents Therefore: Inspectors will write a letter for parents in addition If parents want the full report they can request it from the school

14. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Main Finding In its self evaluation xxxxxxx High School judges itself to be an outstanding Catholic school. In respect of its Catholic ethos, provision for and response of the students to liturgy, and the outcomes of public examinations in religious education, its judgement is fully justified. The senior leadership group has vast experience in the school and knows it intimately; governors also know the school well with a long-serving chairperson; and pupils and parents hold the school and the provision for RE in very high regard. There are aspects of Catholic life and RE that stand in need of development: time for form collective worship is too limited to allow opportunities for pupils to organise and lead an extended prayer or other form of worship; excellent practice in assessment in Key Stage 3 is not matched by that in Key Stage 4 in RE; and more formal monitoring and evaluation processes would provide more secure evidence of the Catholic life.

15. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Survey Different aspects of RE and Catholic life each half term – e.g. collective worship this next half term At the end of each year evidence gathered from the surveys will be published for schools. This document should provide information about good practice in schools in respect of aspects of religious education and Catholic life.

16. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Implications for governors Inspectors will have a very short time available for talking to governors – meeting needs to be focused: How are governors fulfilling their canonical responsibilities for RE and Catholic life – in current climate, defence of Catholic education? Governors’ role in school self evaluation: Knowledge of strengths and needs of Catholic life Knowledge of quality and outcomes from RE How do Governors know – responsibility for oversight and approval of SSE Need for complete openness in self evaluation

17. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Evaluating Catholic life Mission – how well does the school share in the mission of the Church? Ethos – the school’s living according to the teaching of Jesus and the Church and promoting the development of the virtues Leadership which promotes the development of the whole person – “slave leadership”: judged by impact Eucharist at the centre of the school’s life Witness to the beliefs and values of the Faith Commitment to the common good

18. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Is the emphasis on Catholic life realistic today? Inspection 2005-2009

19. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Resources e.g.

20. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE

21. DES website – www.bdes.org.uk

22. DIOCESAN EDUCATION SERVICE Preparation summary Review self evaluation process – Catholic life and RE Ensure that SSE : clarifies the process is accurate in its judgements presents the findings of self evaluation clearly informs improvement planning Review practice in relation to the theme