Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 1 Digital Television Tuner Design IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs.

Published byIsaac Cameron Modified over 10 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 1 Digital Television Tuner Design IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs."— Presentation transcript:

1 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 1 Digital Television Tuner Design IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2005-1-18 Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE 802.22. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEEs name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEEs sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE 802.22. Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures http://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chairhttp://standards.ieee.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf Carl R. StevensonCarl R. Stevenson as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE 802.22 Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at patcom@iee.org.patcom@iee.org >

2 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 2 Abstract The design constraints and current state-of-the-art of television tuner designs are discussed. This presentation was originally given as a tutorial at the 1998 ICCE.

3 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 3 DIGITAL TELEVISION TUNER DESIGN

4 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 4 TOPICS Phase Noise Noise Figure vs. interference VSB vs. QAM Dual conversion Grand Alliance test results References

5 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 5 No problem for NTSC Critical for digital TV Device, frequency, range and PLL design PHASE NOISE

6 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 6 OSCILLATOR PHASE NOISE Flicker Corner Slope changes - 3 to -2 GAAS much higher than silicon

7 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 7 TUNER PHASE NOISE Channel 2 LO = 101 MHz

8 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 8 TUNER PHASE NOISE Channel 20 LO = 553 MHz

9 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 9 PHASE DETECTORS Phase/Frequency - logic gate circuit –Noise from gate timing –No correction for LO noise –Reliable pull-in, NTSC standard GA discriminator –LO2 for double conversion tuner –Frequency and Phase Lock Loop - Ref. 1 Fractional N –Reduces reference feed-through –More complex –Dual Modulus prescaler

10 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 10 NOISE FIGURE VS. INTERFERENCE

11 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 11 TUNER BLOCK DIAGRAM

12 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 12 RF AMPLIFIER Best noise figure peak gain and large signal capability do not occur at the same operating conditions.

13 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 13 VARACTOR Q Loss = 10 Log Q L = Loaded Q = BW/F 0 Q 0 = Unloaded Q of varactor + resonator [ ] 1 1 - QLQL Q0Q0 ( ) 2

14 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 14 TYPICAL VARACTOR R s = 0.5 at 8Pf At 500 MHz, Q0 = 80 Selectivity BWLoss+22 MHz+44 MHz +88 MHz 30 MHz2.0 dB4.7 dB9.4 dB14.7 dB 20 MHz3.3 dB7.613.318.4 15 MHz4.7 dB9.615.120.7

15 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 15 UHF DOUBLE-TUNE FILTER

16 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 16 UHF DOUBLE-TUNE FILTER 1 dB BW = 18 MHz 3 dB BW = 25.6 MHz 1/2 IF, + 22 MHz - 15 dB LO Beat, + 44 MHz - 34 dB Image, + 88 MHz - 63 dB Loss = 6 dB

17 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 17 MIXER Double-balanced Diode +10 dBm LO Drive - 10 dBm Signal input limit 7 dB Loss IF Stage 3 dB NF

18 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 18 TUNER DESIGN F 2 - 1 A1A1 F 1, F 2 and A are power ratios F 1 +NF = 10 Log

19 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 19 ASSUME RF gain = 10 dB RF NF = 2 dB Filter Loss= 2 dB per resonator Mixer Loss= 7 dB RF: 4 dB NF (2.51), gain 8 dB (6.31) Mix/IF: NF = 4 + 7 + 3 = 14 dB (25.1) Sys. NF = 10 Log[2.51 + (25.1 - 1)/6.31)] Tuner NF = 8 dB(+ 2 dB production tol.) Adjacent channel overloads mixer at -14 dBm

20 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 20 SYSTEM NOISE FIGURE Planning Factors for Computer Analysis Single receiver Outside antenna No VCR, amplifiers or splitters

21 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 21 RECEIVER PLANNING FACTORS

22 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 22 MODERN FRINGE AREA HOME

23 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 23 Planning Factor Home

24 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 24 RESULTS OF MAST MOUNTED ANTENNA AMPLIFIERS

25 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 25 SYSTEM NOISE FIGURE

26 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 26 CO-CHANNEL vs. ADJACENT CHANNEL QAM better for adjacent channel Interference removed after demod by LPF Optional pilot tone centered on NTSC Worse for co-channel into NTSC

27 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 27 Adjacent Channel Interference

28 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 28 Co-channel Interference

29 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 29 IF SAW Filter 8 VSB similar to NTSC Lower adjacent demod into desired Need ~ 60 dB lower adjacent rejection Pilot falls on edge of NTSC SAW for better co-channel

30 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 30 TYPICAL NTSC SAW FILTER

31 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 31 DTV SAW

32 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 32 BETTER DTV SAW

33 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 33 GRAND ALLIANCE DOUBLE CONVERSION TUNER

34 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 34 CHOICE OF 1ST IF FREQUENCY Cellular Phones Cable TV assigns channels to 1 GHz Ref. EIA 542 Recommended Cable Television Identification Plan Footnotes: for 611, 919, and 955 to 967 MHz are potential problems for dual conversion

35 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 35 SELF GENERATED INTERFERENCE L01 / L02 harmonics produce beats Shielding and isolation needed Example: GA Tuner on HRC cable ch. 56 2 x 1335.75 (L01) = 2671.50 MHz 3 x 876 (L02) = 2828.00 43.50 MHz

36 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 36 DIELECTRIC FILTER PARASITIC RESONANCE

37 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 37 FILTERS RF selectivity to reduce overload Image of 2nd conversion same as SCT First IF selectivity – Low frequency side – Half IF - 22 MHz – LO Beat - 44 MHz – Image - 88 MHz Bandwidth, Loss, group delay, # of sections

38 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 38 3 SECTION DIELECTRIC FILTER BW @ -1dB = 31.2 MHz BW @ -3dB = 41.2 MHz Half IF Rejection @ -22 MHz = 3.8 dB LO Beat Rejection @ -44 MHz = 19 dB Image Rejection @ -88 MHz = 36 dB Insertion Loss = 2.0 dB

39 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 39 3 SECTION DIELECTRIC FILTER

40 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 40 3 SECTION DIELECTRIC FILTER BW @ -1dB = 12.4 MHz BW @ -3dB = 16.4 MHz LO Beat Rejection @ -44 MHz = 43 dB Image Rejection @ -88 MHz = 55 dB Half IF Rejection @ -22 MHz = 26 dB Insertion Loss = 4.0 dB

41 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 41 3 SECTION DIELECTRIC FILTER

42 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 42 GA SYSTEM TEST RESULTS Ref. 6 ATV Receiver S/N 15 dB Co-channel NTSC1.8 dB Co-channel ATV15.3 dB Lower Adj. channel NTSC- 48 dB Lower Adj. channel ATV- 42 dB Upper Adj. channel NTSC- 49 dB Upper Adj. channel ATV- 43 dB Taboo channels - exceeded test range - 15 dBm Phase Noise - 78dBc/Hz @ 20kHz

43 doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 43 REFERENCES 1. Citta, Richard Frequency and Phase Lock Loop, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Vol. CE-23, August 1977 2. Rhea, Randall W. Oscillator Design and Computer Simulation 1995 Noble Publishing, Atlanta 3. Gardiner, F. M. Phaselock Techniques 1979 John Wiley & Sons 4. S. Perlow Noise Performance Factors in Television Tuners RCA Review vol. 37, March 1976, pp 119-135 5. Zenith Electronics Corporation VSB Transmission System, Technical Details Dec. 17, 1993 6. Final Technical Report, FCC Advisory committee on Advanced Television Service, Oct. 31, 1995 http://www.atsc.org/acats.html 7. FCC web site on digital television: http://www.fcc.gov/dtv 8. EIA/CEMA web site: http://www.cemacity.org/works/pubs

Download ppt "Doc.: IEEE 802.22-05-0006-00-0000 Submission January, 2005 Max Muterspaugh, TTE/ThomsonSlide 1 Digital Television Tuner Design IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs."

Similar presentations

Sg-whitespace-09/0019r0 Submission January 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Impact of FCC R&O on IEEE 802 Date: 2009-01-22 Authors: Notice: This.

Sg-whitespace-09/0019r0 Submission January 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Impact of FCC R&O on IEEE 802 Date: Authors: Notice: This.
Spectrum Sensing for DVB-T OFDM Systems Using Pilot Tones

Spectrum Sensing for DVB-T OFDM Systems Using Pilot Tones
Doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0006r0 Submission March 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Intel CorporationSlide 1 What is a CA document? Notice: This document has been prepared.

Doc.: IEEE /0006r0 Submission March 2005 Steve Shellhammer, Intel CorporationSlide 1 What is a CA document? Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE 802.22-07/0206r0 Submission April 2007 Baowei Ji, SamsungSlide 1 Improper to Limit Long Quiet Period at the end of a Superframe IEEE P802.22.

Doc.: IEEE /0206r0 Submission April 2007 Baowei Ji, SamsungSlide 1 Improper to Limit Long Quiet Period at the end of a Superframe IEEE P
Doc.: IEEE 802.19-05/0018r0 Submission June 2005 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 1 802.15.1a Coexistence Characteristics Notice: This document.

Doc.: IEEE /0018r0 Submission June 2005 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide a Coexistence Characteristics Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE 802.22-07/0267r0 Submission June 2007 Wendong Hu, STMicroelectronicsSlide 1 The Spectrum Manager in a Proposed Reference Architecture IEEE P802.22.

Doc.: IEEE /0267r0 Submission June 2007 Wendong Hu, STMicroelectronicsSlide 1 The Spectrum Manager in a Proposed Reference Architecture IEEE P
Doc.: IEEE 802.19-06/0029r0 Submission July 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Coexistence Scenario – A Pair of Unlicensed Wireless Networks, one.

Doc.: IEEE /0029r0 Submission July 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Coexistence Scenario – A Pair of Unlicensed Wireless Networks, one.
Doc.: IEEE 802.22-08/xxxxr0 Submission May. 2008 Cheng Shan, Samsung Electronics Slide 1 CBP PHY Design IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2008-05-11 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission May Cheng Shan, Samsung Electronics Slide 1 CBP PHY Design IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors:
1Runcom Technologies Ltd. Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom March 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07/0202r0 Slide 1 Runcom Preamble vs. Phillips Proposed Sequences IEEE.

1Runcom Technologies Ltd. Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom March 2007 Doc.: IEEE /0202r0 Slide 1 Runcom Preamble vs. Phillips Proposed Sequences IEEE.
1Runcom Technologies Ltd. Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom April 2007 Doc.: IEEE802.22-07/0164r0 Slide 1 Runcom Preamble vs. Phillips Proposed Sequences IEEE.

1Runcom Technologies Ltd. Submission Eli Sofer, Runcom April 2007 Doc.: IEEE /0164r0 Slide 1 Runcom Preamble vs. Phillips Proposed Sequences IEEE.
Doc.: IEEE 802.19-06/xxxxr0 Submission July 2006 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 1 Discussion of Definitions in 0023r2 Notice: This document.

Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission July 2006 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 1 Discussion of Definitions in 0023r2 Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE 802.22-08/0104r0 Submission March 2008 Stephen Kuffner, MotorolaSlide 1 IEEE 802.22.1 Packet Error Rates for MSF1 and MSF2 IEEE P802.22 Wireless.

Doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission March 2008 Stephen Kuffner, MotorolaSlide 1 IEEE Packet Error Rates for MSF1 and MSF2 IEEE P Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE 802.22-06/0156r0 Submission August 2006 Carlos Cordeiro, PhilipsSlide 1 Superframe Structure IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2006-08-15 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0156r0 Submission August 2006 Carlos Cordeiro, PhilipsSlide 1 Superframe Structure IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.22-07/0365r0 Submission July 2007 Monisha Ghosh, PhilipsSlide 1 Rate ¼ Convolution Code IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2007-07-17 Authors:

Doc.: IEEE /0365r0 Submission July 2007 Monisha Ghosh, PhilipsSlide 1 Rate ¼ Convolution Code IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE 802.22-07/0125-00-0000 Submission March 2007 Monisha Ghosh, PhilipsSlide 1 DTV Signal Sensing Using Pilot Detection IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs.

Doc.: IEEE / Submission March 2007 Monisha Ghosh, PhilipsSlide 1 DTV Signal Sensing Using Pilot Detection IEEE P Wireless RANs.
Doc.: IEEE 802.22-06/0018r1 Submission January 2006 Patrick Pirat, France TelecomSlide 1 OQAM performances and complexity IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date:

Doc.: IEEE /0018r1 Submission January 2006 Patrick Pirat, France TelecomSlide 1 OQAM performances and complexity IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Doc.: IEEE 802.22-06/XXXXr0 Submission September 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 An Evaluation of DTV Pilot Power Detection IEEE P802.22 Wireless.

Doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 Submission September 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 An Evaluation of DTV Pilot Power Detection IEEE P Wireless.
Doc.: IEEE 802.22-06/0127r1 Submission July 2006 Slide 1 Huawei Sensing Scheme for DVB-T IEEE P802.22 Wireless RANs Date: 2006-07-17 Authors: Notice: This.

Doc.: IEEE /0127r1 Submission July 2006 Slide 1 Huawei Sensing Scheme for DVB-T IEEE P Wireless RANs Date: Authors: Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0178r0 Submission January 2006 Clint Chaplin, Wi-Fi AllianceSlide 1 Wi-Fi Alliance Liaison Report Notice: This document has been prepared.

Doc.: IEEE /0178r0 Submission January 2006 Clint Chaplin, Wi-Fi AllianceSlide 1 Wi-Fi Alliance Liaison Report Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE 802.22-07-0300r1 Submission June 2007 Chang-Joo Kim, ETRISlide 1 [Proposed Burst Allocation Method Relating to DS/US-MAP] IEEE P802.22 Wireless.

Doc.: IEEE r1 Submission June 2007 Chang-Joo Kim, ETRISlide 1 [Proposed Burst Allocation Method Relating to DS/US-MAP] IEEE P Wireless.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google