1. Writing (and revising) papers No publication, no projectNo publication, no project –Make information available for others No publication, no promotionNo publication, no promotion –Yardstick of productivity No publication, no fundingNo publication, no funding –What have you done for me lately? Why is it important? Publishing your work is vital for success

2. Writing (and revising) papers Decide on authors, and their order, as early as possibleDecide on authors, and their order, as early as possible –Preferably before starting the project Authors should only include those who have made a substantive intellectual contribution to the project reported, and can defend the data and conclusions publiclyAuthors should only include those who have made a substantive intellectual contribution to the project reported, and can defend the data and conclusions publicly Decide on authors, and their order, as early as possibleDecide on authors, and their order, as early as possible –Preferably before starting the project Authors should only include those who have made a substantive intellectual contribution to the project reported, and can defend the data and conclusions publiclyAuthors should only include those who have made a substantive intellectual contribution to the project reported, and can defend the data and conclusions publicly Authorship

3. Writing (and revising) papers Generate at least part of the intellectual contentGenerate at least part of the intellectual content –Conception or design of the work –Data analysis and interpretation Draft, critically review or revise the intellectual contentDraft, critically review or revise the intellectual content Approve the final version to be submittedApprove the final version to be submitted Criteria for authorship All three criteria should be satisfied

4. Writing (and revising) papers Target audienceTarget audience –Who would be interested in reading this paper? Import and significance of the findingsImport and significance of the findings –Seek input from colleagues Decide on the journal before beginning to writeDecide on the journal before beginning to write Choosing the right journal

5. Writing (and revising) papers Key element that advertises the papers contentsKey element that advertises the papers contents –Be as specific as possible –Include main aspects of study including model used –Can be used to indicate an ongoing series Often helpful to choose the title when the paper is almost completeOften helpful to choose the title when the paper is almost complete Structure – the title

6. Writing (and revising) papers Should be complete, and intelligible without reference to the textShould be complete, and intelligible without reference to the text Ordinarily, should not include actual data valuesOrdinarily, should not include actual data values –Compare with a meeting abstract Avoid abbreviations and citationsAvoid abbreviations and citations Write it at the end!Write it at the end! Structure – the abstract

7. Writing (and revising) papers Prominently state the hypothesis that prompted your investigationProminently state the hypothesis that prompted your investigation Briefly review the pertinent literature that led to this workBriefly review the pertinent literature that led to this work Conclude at the starting point for the current investigation rather than including a summary of the data obtainedConclude at the starting point for the current investigation rather than including a summary of the data obtained Structure – the introduction

8. Writing (and revising) papers A good place to start for beginning authorsA good place to start for beginning authors –Should be the easiest section of the paper to write Should permit another to repeat your work, but need not be exhaustiveShould permit another to repeat your work, but need not be exhaustive –OK to cite previous methods of your lab or others Identify sources of key reagentsIdentify sources of key reagents Structure – the methods section

9. Writing (and revising) papers The heart of the paperThe heart of the paper No need to follow chronology of studyNo need to follow chronology of study –Rather, provide a logical progression and tell a story Provide only enough interpretation to lead reader from one experiment to the nextProvide only enough interpretation to lead reader from one experiment to the next –Avoid lengthy analysis and comparisons to the work of others here Avoid duplication of information between text, figures, legends and tablesAvoid duplication of information between text, figures, legends and tables Structure – the results section

10. Writing (and revising) papers Length proportional to amount of new information presentedLength proportional to amount of new information presented –Avoid redundancy with results section Parallel structure of results section plus introductory and concluding paragraphsParallel structure of results section plus introductory and concluding paragraphs Avoid undue speculation and claims of primacyAvoid undue speculation and claims of primacy Structure – the discussion section

11. Writing (and revising) papers Finalize at the end using a software packageFinalize at the end using a software package Ensure correct formatting for journal of submissionEnsure correct formatting for journal of submission Most papers can be adequately referenced with less than 50 citationsMost papers can be adequately referenced with less than 50 citations –Check that introduction and discussion are not out of proportion to new information presented Avoid excessive self-citation, and check all citations for accuracyAvoid excessive self-citation, and check all citations for accuracy –Remember who your reviewers might be! Structure - references

12. Writing (and revising) papers First or third person?First or third person? –Latter is more formal, but former often makes for a livelier read Back to basicsBack to basics –Use an outline – know where youre going –Carefully consider issues of sentence and paragraph construction, run-on sentences –Dont use five words when one will do Allow trainees to develop their own style, while maintaining quality controlAllow trainees to develop their own style, while maintaining quality control Read, write and review to learn what worksRead, write and review to learn what works Stylistic issues

13. Writing (and revising) papers Read the instructionsRead the instructions –Provide all requested items –Dont make enemies in the editorial office Ensure appropriate file format for on-line submission, including figuresEnsure appropriate file format for on-line submission, including figures –Is the on-line version the one you want reviewers to see? Confirm receipt; enquire if a decision has not be received after six-eight weeksConfirm receipt; enquire if a decision has not be received after six-eight weeks The submission process

14. Writing (and revising) papers If your paper is returned for revision, you are in good companyIf your paper is returned for revision, you are in good company Its OK to get mad, but dont act on itIts OK to get mad, but dont act on it Try to understand what the reviewers are really sayingTry to understand what the reviewers are really saying –If the reviewers did not understand your work, is it because you did not present it clearly in the first place? Look for clues from the editor as to the extent of revision neededLook for clues from the editor as to the extent of revision needed The revision process

15. Writing (and revising) papers Complete additional experiments if neededComplete additional experiments if needed Resist temptation to prepare an impassioned response to points with which you disagreeResist temptation to prepare an impassioned response to points with which you disagree Stand firm if that is truly the right thing to doStand firm if that is truly the right thing to do –But do so diplomatically, backed up with citations Sincerely thank the editor and reviewers for helping you to improve your workSincerely thank the editor and reviewers for helping you to improve your work –They have invested a lot of time, mostly on a voluntary basis Ask a neutral colleague to review your responseAsk a neutral colleague to review your response Responding to reviews

16. Writing (and revising) papers If a very major revision is called for, or if your paper is rejected, consider another journalIf a very major revision is called for, or if your paper is rejected, consider another journal –Was your initial selection of journal part of the problem? Avoid LPUsAvoid LPUs –Consider doing more work to make your study more substantive More papers are rejected on the basis of priority than because of scientific flawsMore papers are rejected on the basis of priority than because of scientific flaws Handling rejections

17. Writing (and revising) papers Do the study with the paper in mindDo the study with the paper in mind Seek as much input from colleagues as possibleSeek as much input from colleagues as possible –Need to see the wood as well as the trees Remember who the reviewers might beRemember who the reviewers might be If unsure about ethics, ask!If unsure about ethics, ask! Practice, practice, practice!Practice, practice, practice! Closing thoughts