1. Forensic Science

2. In its broadest definition, forensic science is the application of science to criminal and civil laws Forensic science owes its origins to individuals such as Bertillon, Galton, Lattes, Goddard, Osborn, and Locard, who developed the principles and techniques needed to identify or compare physical evidence Definition

3. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle Wrote the Sherlock Holmes series First to use new principles of: – serology –fingerprinting –firearm detection –questioned-document examination …long before they were used by real-life police agencies History

4. Founding Fathers

5. Mathieu Orfila (1787-1853) Considered father of toxicology: studied the detection of poisons and their effects on animals

6. Francis Galton (1822-1911) Studied fingerprints; first to develop a method for classifying them

7. Hans Gross (1847-1915) Spent many years studying and developing principles of criminal investigation Tied all areas of science to the criminal investigation field

8. Edmond Locard (1877-1966) Incorporated Gross’ principles within a workable crime laboratory Developed Locard’s Exchange Principle: When a criminal comes in contact with an object or person, a cross-transfer of evidence occurs

9. Leone Lattes (1887-1954) Discovered blood can be typed into 4 groups: A, B, AB, and O

10. Calvin Goddard (1891-1955) Established use of comparison microscope as a tool for firearm identification

11. Albert S. Osborn (1858-1946) First to examine documents as evidence

12. Walter McCrone (1916-2002) Popularized the use of microscopes as a tool in forensics

13. Sir Alec Jeffreys Developed the first DNA profiling test in 1984

14. First police crime lab in the world was established in France in 1910 by Edmond Locard First police crime lab in the U.S. opened in 1924 The first FBI crime lab opened in 1932 Crime Lab History

15. The development of crime laboratories in the United States has been characterized by rapid growth accompanied by a lack of national and regional planning and coordination At present, approximately 350 public crime laboratories operate at various levels of government—federal, state, county, and municipal The Crime Lab

16. The ever increasing number of crime laboratories is partly the result of the following: –Supreme Court decisions in the 1960s responsible for police placing greater emphasis on scientifically evaluated evidence –Crime laboratories inundated with drug specimens due to accelerated drug abuse. –The advent of DNA profiling The Crime Lab ctd.

17. The technical support provided by crime laboratories can be assigned to five basic services –Physical Science Unit incorporates the principles of chemistry, physics, and geology to identify and compare physical evidence –Biology Unit applies the knowledge of biological sciences in order to investigate blood samples, body fluids, hair, and fiber samples Technical Support

18. –Firearms Unit investigates discharged bullets, cartridge cases, shotgun shells, and ammunition –Document Unit provides the skills needed for handwriting analysis and other questioned- document issues –Photographic Unit applies specialized photographic techniques for recording and examining physical evidence Technical Support

19. Optional Services by Full-Service Labs –Toxicology Unit examines body fluids and organs for the presence of drugs and poisons –Latent Fingerprint Unit processes and examines evidence for latent fingerprints –Polygraph Unit conducts polygraph or lie detector tests –Voiceprint Analysis Unit attempts to tie a recorded voice to a particular suspect –Evidence-Collection Unit dispatches specially trained personnel to the crime scene to collect and preserve physical evidence Technical Support

20. The Frye v. United States decision set guidelines for determining the admissibility of scientific evidence into the courtroom To meet the Frye standard, the evidence in question must be “generally accepted” by the scientific community The Frye Standard

21. However, in the 1993 case of Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceutical, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court asserted that the Frye standard is not an absolute prerequisite to the admissibility of scientific evidence Trial judges were said to be ultimately responsible as “gatekeepers” for the admissibility and validity of scientific evidence presented in their courts, as well as all expert testimony Frye Not Absolute

22. Special Forensic Science Services