1. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Introduction The BeetleMA0 back-up solution. A readout chip that complies to the LHCb read out specifications and can interface directly to a Multi-anode pmt with a photon response of 300,000 electrons. The BeetleMA0 was submitted on the 2 nd of December 2002 and arrived in Oxford on 8 th of April 2003. 1.Set up 2.Analogue response to single photon 3.Pipeline response to single photon 4.News on Beetle1.3 submission 30 th June. 5.Is Beetle1.3MA1 submission needed 6.Conclusion 7.Future work

2. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Set up 1.No common mode correction. 2.Analogue test point is an access point to the buffer of a front end of a Beetle1.2MA0 amplifier located at channel 1. This input is bonded and connected to a MApmt. 3.A pipe line measurement is when channel 1 (bullet point 2 above) is read out via the pipe line column number 35H through CLC400 receiver circuitry. 4.MAPmt has the serial number 9C23A4. 5.Chip 42 from wafer D4KKGZKT is under test. 6.In total 12 channels are bonded and connected to the MAPmt, test channel (standard front end), ch0-2 (Attenuation amp), ch8- 10 (standard front end) and ch115-119 (Attenuation amp). 7.Ipre=596,Isha=78,Ibuf=110,Ipipe=102,vd=1265,vdcl=1216, Ivoltbuf=204,Isf=204 and Icurrent=533, vfs=0,vfp=0.

3. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford 1x 1.2 T Dummy Att 3x 1.2AttT Ch(0..2) 3x 1.2DivT Ch(3..5) 2x FBRmod Ch(6..7) 3x 1.2_T Ch(8..10) 53x 1.2Div Ch(11..63) 64x1.2Att Ch(64..127) Beetle1.2_MA0 Floor Plan Iocc input to ch4, Prebias, Prebias1, Shabias, Shabias1, Bufbias, Att_T, Div_t, FBRmod, 1.2_T 5.2mm 6.1mm

4. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Beetle1.2MA0 Att Front-end ~300K ohm ~807fF ~85K ohm ~197fF total ~190fF Red box means different to the standard Beetle1.2

5. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Test Box MApmtPipe line output BeetleMA0 x 2Heidelberg Mother Brd Analogue Test point

6. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford DAQ is done using a TDS3054B scope and labview. 10,000 sample points with a time resolution of 200 ps Set sample point

7. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford LED jitter measurement, measured at the analogue test point. HT –882V, LED 30V Single channel pmt was used for this test. Any signal above 2 mV in a 50 ns window was considered a hit. The peak of the hit was found and the time slot plotted to the histogram. Rate of LED was 100 KHz. Scope sample rate 5 GS/s. Jitter +/- 2.5 ns

8. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Single photon response measured at the analogue test point. HT –882V, LED 30V,vfp=110mv Pk=58 mV Rt 10-90 =12 nS Ft25 ns=33%

9. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Analogue response with and without clks. Shoulder Noise sigma has increased by 725 uV, S/N down by factor of 1.5 Quantisation problem

10. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Pipeline persistence: Both Beetle1.2 and Beetle1.2MA0 are shown, LED =0V. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 RMS~4.4 mV RMS~5.2 mV RMS~17 mV Ch 1, MA0 Att, pmt connected Ch 9, B1.2, pmt connected Ch 12, B1.2, pmt not connected

11. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Pipeline response with increasing LED. Pipeline location 35H, channel 1

12. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Pipeline response with increasing HT

13. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Pipeline response with increasing HT

14. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford New on Beetle1.3 Sticky charge effect. Fault has been simulated, die has been opened and probe inserted to emulate bug fix. Problem solved by adding analogue delay to the reset of pipe amp (might be track and hold). No change in digital control logic needed. Base-line variation. Fault has been simulated and die opened to measure Vdd of shaper to show voltage drop. External source has been supplied to show fix will work. Fix is by increasing x of chip by ~200um and increasing power rail. Comparator. No change of control logic, just change 3 bit shift reg to a 5 bit shift reg. Over-voltage problem. Current on output buffer killed chip, output is now restricted to 100uA, should be done by user. 80MHz clk feed through, understood, to many fanouts. Fix is to change clk trunk and control layout. Next MPW submission is 30 th June, Engineering run Q1 2004.

15. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Chip submission considerations Heidelberg engineering & production run has been paid for, this is considered to be MPI’s contribution to LHCb. If we take 1.3 chips or join the HD submission in Q1 2004 with MA chips the cost for the RICH group will probably be wavered. If we do not take 1.3 chips and go for a later MA engineering/production run then we will be liable for the full cost.

16. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Chip submission costing Cost of an engineering run is about 20% more than a production run. Can share these costs with other groups. Sharing production runs is not easy. Timing is difficult, can be restrictions on die sizes because of dicing, have to also share the engineering run as engineering mask must go to production. Around 800 chips/wafer for a BeetleMAP size chip. LHCb RICH needs around 2000 chips (assuming an 80% yield and no spares) therefore 2.5 wafers. Engineering run gives 2-6 wafers, but only guarantees 2. So maybe possible to get all the chips from an engineering run. But if the target is not met then will have to pay out for a full production of 48 wafers, might be wise to consider sharing.

17. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford Conclusions Beetle1.2MA0 is performing well. The analogue response to a MApmt looks good and complies with LHCb. Signal to noise has been measured at the output of the pipeline. This can be improved with improved cmr and better layout. The comparator is yet to be tested. Further improvement would be made by replacing the back end B1.2 with a B1.3. Comparisons between B1.2 and MA0 shows that MA0 seems to be much less sensitive to it’s environment and hence has better performance in S/N. This should be further studied. Decision on MA0 must be made by the end of November if we want to take advantage of being a part of the HD submission.

18. 26/06/2003Nigel Smale University of Oxford 1.Analogue pipeline offsets 2.Noise measurements, increasing in c load 3.Gain measurements, spread if any across channels 4.Best parameters for running 5.A/c response, I.e bandwidth 6.Corner measurements I.e temp, max clk, jitter 7.Threshold scans for comp out and pipeline out 8.Cross talk, analogue and binary 9.Time walk into adjacent pipeline cells 10.Common mode power rejection, effects of varying Vsupply 11.Supply voltage margin > 2.5V 12.Dead time for large saturating input pulse 13.DC drift over time 14.And more Future Work