Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

MEDICAL GRANDROUNDS ERNEST JOEL SAMACO M.D. FEBUARY 1, 2007

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "MEDICAL GRANDROUNDS ERNEST JOEL SAMACO M.D. FEBUARY 1, 2007"— Presentation transcript:

1 MEDICAL GRANDROUNDS ERNEST JOEL SAMACO M.D. FEBUARY 1, 2007
GOOD MORNING MEDICAL GRANDROUNDS ERNEST JOEL SAMACO M.D. FEBUARY 1, 2007

2 A.G. 51 MALE MARRIED CATHOLIC EMPLOYEE KAWIT CAVITE
GENERAL DATA A.G. 51 MALE MARRIED CATHOLIC EMPLOYEE KAWIT CAVITE

3 CHIEF COMPLAINT ABDOMINAL PAIN

4 Objectives To present a case of a female patient with a giant malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the jejunum To discuss the approach to patients with abdominal pain - its evaluation and management To discuss the management of gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

5 HISTORY OF PRESENT ILLNESS
Three month5 day hx abdominal fullness appetite irregular bowel movement (-) nausea, vomiting, fever (-)early satiety,melena,hematochezia , domperidone 10mg 2 tab + consult AMD Imp: Acid Peptic Disease PFA: Ileus Ranitidine 1 tab BID x 1week Pineverium bromide x 3 days Domperidone 10 mg TID

6 PFA Reflex Ileus Right Pelvic Calcification R/O Distal
Calculus in the distal end of the right ureter

7 Two month + still with abdominal fullness
occassional crampy RUQ abdominal pain, PS 7-8/10 re-consulted AMD s/p gastroscopy dx duodenal ulcer; negative H.pyolri Esomeprazole 20mg BID; domperidone 10mgTID ac; rebamipide 100mg TID ac symptoms improved Irrectable abdominal pain None responsive to medication American Gastro recomendadtion egd >45 Colonoscopy was not done because the symptoms does not indicative to do colonoscopy Hisotpath biopsy was not done because

8 Night PTAabdominal pain 10/10 localized at the LUQ
One monthrecurrence abdominal fullness Repeat gastroscopy done showed healing duodenal ulcer, gastritis Esomeprazole 40mg OD x 4 wk 2 weeks PTAprogressive bloatedness constipation Night PTAabdominal pain 10/10 localized at the LUQ associated with severe bloatedness and nausea Persistence of symptoms prompted consult

9 Review of Systems (-) fever (-) chest pain (-) cough (-) DOB
(-) easy fatigability (-) urinary changes (+) weight loss

10 Past Medical History (+) HPN, HBP: 160/100 NBP: 130/90 on metoprolol 50mg 1/2 tab BID and valsartan+HCTZ 160/2.5mg OD (-) DM (-) PTB, Bronchial Asthma, allergies (-) previous surgery Denies use of NSAID

11 Family History (-) HPN, DM, Asthma (-) Cancer Personal Social History
(-) smoker (-) drinker No food preference Denies exposure to chemicals

12 Physical Exam Conscious coherent, not in CRD
BP: 130/90 HR: 76 RR: 20 T36.2 Ht 5’8” Wt 188 lbs BMI 28.9 SHEENT: anicteric sclerae, pink palpebral conjunctivae, No CLAD, flat neck veins C/L: no spider naevi noted, symmetric chest expansion, clear breath sounds Heart: adynamic precordium, distinct heart sounds, NRRR, no murmur.

13 Abdomen: Globular (40.4 inches), normoactive BS, no abdominal bruit, soft, (+)direct tenderness LUQ, (-) rebound tenderness, (-) Murphy’s and Mc Burney’s signs, tympanitic,(-) shifting dullness, (-)organomegaly/mass Ext: Full equal pulses, Pink nail beds, (-) edema Rectal: Good sphincter muscles,(-) tenderness, (-)mass, (-) blood on examining finger

14 Salient Features 51 male Abdominal pain (LUQ) Severe bloatedness
Nausea constipation (+) weight loss 6 lbs 3 months PUD S/P EGD Hypertensive No family history of cancer Abdomen: globular (40.4inches), direct tenderness LUQ

15 Admitting Impression Irritable Bowel Sydrome
Acid Peptic Ulcer disease (s/p Gastroscopy 9/06 & 10/06) Hypertensive Cardiovascular Disease

16 Course in the wards

17 At the ER Diagnostics: CBC, Serum Na, K, lipase, ECG, CXR NPO
IVF: D5MM 1L x 8 Meds: Tramadol 50mg IV q 8 Esomeprazole 40mg IV OD Metoclopromide 10mg IV q8

18 CBC Serum K: 2.5 (corrected 20 meq IV and kalium durules)
Serum Na: 135 Lipase:16 Urinalysis: Normal Hgb 14.4 Hct 43.6 RBC 4.8 WBC 10,370 Eos 2.0 Neu 77.0 Lym 14.0 PC 331,000

19 ECG 11/12

20 CXR

21 PFA and CT scan C/O radiology dept

22

23

24 PFA result Hazziness seen in the hypogastrium extending to the right psoas Ileus Abnormal finding in the lower abdomen ct scan colleration was suggested NGT inserted initial 1250cc yellowish

25

26

27 CT Scan whole abdomen 12.7 x 21.9 x 19.5 cm lobulated heterogeneously enhancing abdominopelvic mass, abutting anterior abdominal wall r/o lymphoma , teratoma. Diverticlosis, sigmopid colon Areas of consolidation with ground glass opacities lateral and postero-basal segments, right lower lobe and postero-basal segments, left lower lobe. Consider pneumonic process.

28 Interventional radiology referral
Surgery referral Abdominal mass with signs of obstruction maintained on NPO Interventional radiology referral CT scan aspiration biopsy Consistent with Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Exploratory Laparotomy with adhesiolysis, Biopsy of mesocolon nodules, Debulking of intrabodominal tumor,with resection of distal jejunum, Appendectomy, end to end anastomosis of distal jejunum 1st hospital day 1250cc initial drain yellowish A Biopsy done base on the ct scan report to determine what type of tumor because it will determine the course of treatment

29 Slightly sero-sanguinous ascites about 100cc
(+) fleshy friable lobulated tumor apparently invading/arising from small intestine about 6 feet from ligament of trietz with cavity containing abscess Multiple flabby nodules scattered around mesocolon mesentry and anterior abdominal wall

30 Surgical Pathology Picture
C/O pathology

31 Surgical Pathology Report
Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor (CD-117 and Vimentin positive) Acute Appendicitis with lymphoid hyperplasia Malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumor, tissues labeled mesocolic nodules Immunohistochemical Stain Vimentin (+) CD117(+) CK (AE1/AE3) (+)

32 Post operatively, the course in the wards were unremarkable.
Referred to Oncology Suggest to start Imatinib Mesylate 400meqs/day 2-3 weeks post operation Post operatively, the course in the wards were unremarkable. Discharged Improved 15th HD

33

34

35 11/15 11/17 11/18 11/22 11/25 hgb 13.8 12.6 12 10.1 hct 41.8 39.1 37.1 32.1 32.6 rbc 4.3 4.1 3.5 wbc 10760 10300 13570 10180 9790 neu 82 85 91 90 lymph 9 8 6 7 13 mono 3 2 pc 307t 262t 535t 616t

36 Abdominal pain/ LUQ Bowel/Colon: IBS Fecal Impaction GB/Pancreas:
Tumor diverticolosis GB/Pancreas: Cholecystolithiasis Acute pancreatitis Stomach: Peptic ulcer Tumor ultrasound CT ERCP barrium enema Endoscopy PFA Endoscopy Upper GI Series

37 FINAL DIAGNOSIS 1.GASTROINTESTINAL STROMAL TUMOR
2. INTESTINAL OBSTRUCTION 2 TO JEJUNAL TUMOR 3. S/P EXPLORATORY LAPOROTOMY WITH COMPLEX ADHENOLYSIS AND DEBULKING OF TUMOR AND JEJUNAL RESECTION 4. Hypertension Stage II

38 DISCUSSION Indication for Endoscopy and Colonoscopy
Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor

39 Indications for EGD American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
Our patient is presented with chronic abdominal pain and underwent gastroscopy. For the benefit of the residents, I would like to discuss he indication of egd and colonoscopy for academic purposes. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2006;52:831-7.

40 EGD is generally indicated for evaluating:
A.Upper abdominal symptoms that persist despite an appropriate trial of therapy B.Upper abdominal symptoms associated with other symptoms or signs suggesting serious organic disease (e.g., anorexia and weight loss) or in patients >45 years old C.Dysphagia or odynophagia D.Esophageal reflux symptoms that are persistent or recurrent despite appropriate therapy E.Persistent vomiting of unknown cause G.Familial adenomatous polyposis syndromes H.For confirmation and specific histologic diagnosis of radiologically demonstrated lesion I.GI bleeding J.When sampling of tissue or fluid is indicated K.In patients with suspected portal hypertension to document or treat esophageal varices

41 L.To assess acute injury after caustic ingestion
M.Banding or sclerotherapy of varices N.Removal of foreign bodies O.Removal of selected polypoid lesions P.Placement of feeding or drainage tubes Q.Dilation of stenotic lesions (e.g., with transendoscopic balloon dilators or dilation systems using guidewires) R.Management of achalasia T.Palliative treatment of stenosing neoplasms

42 Colonoscopy Indications*
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Appropriate use of gastrointestinal endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006;52:831-7.

43 A..Evaluation on barium enema or other imaging study of an abnormality
that is likely to be clinically significant, such as a filling defect or stricture B..Evaluation of unexplained gastrointestinal bleediNG C.Unexplained iron deficiency anemia D..Screening and surveillance for colonic neoplasia 1.Screening of asymptomatic, average-risk patients for colonic neoplasia 2.Examination to evaluate the entire colon for synchronous cancer or neoplastic polyps in a patient with treatable cancer or neoplastic polyp 3.Colonoscopy to remove synchronous neoplastic lesions at or around time of curative resection of cancer followed by colonoscopy at 3 years and 3-5 years thereafter to detect metachronous cancer 4.After adequate clearance of neoplastic polyp(s) survey at 3- to 5-year intervals

44 6.In patients with ulcerative or Crohn's pancolitis 8 or more years’
5.Patients with significant family history a..Hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer: colonoscopy every 2 years beginning at the earlier of age 25 years or 5 years younger than the earliest age of diagnosis of colorectal cancer. Annual colonoscopy should begin at age 40 years. b.Sporadic colorectal cancer before age 60 years: colonoscopy every 5 years beginning at age 10 years earlier than the affected relative or every 3 years if adenoma is found 6.In patients with ulcerative or Crohn's pancolitis 8 or more years’ duration every 1-2 years with systematic biopsies to detect dysplasia E.Clinically significant diarrhea of unexplained origin F.Intraoperative identification of a lesion not apparent at surgery

45 G.Treatment of bleeding from such lesions as vascular
malformation, ulceration, neoplasia, and polypectomy site H.Foreign body removal I.Excision of colonic polyp J.Decompression of acute nontoxic megacolon or sigmoid volvulus K.Balloon dilation of stenotic lesions L.Palliative treatment of stenosing or bleeding neoplasms M.Marking a neoplasm for localization

46 Management of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
Report of GIST Consensus Conference of March 2004 under ESMO CONSENSUS MEETING FOR MANAGEMENT OF GIST REPOST OF THE GIST CONSENSUS CONFERENCE MARCH 2004 UNDER THE AUSPICES OF ESMO Annals of Oncology (4);

47 Introduction 1983 describes as tumors in GIT and Mesentery
Characterized by specific histological and immunohistochemical pattern Median age of 60 year old Incidence of 10 cases per 1 million which approxiately 1/3 are malignant Male predominance The stomach is the most common site for GITS, with the small bowel being the second most frequent location GITS tumor constitutes 1%-3% of all gastric tumors and develop from the intestinal cell of Cajal ( or pacemaker cells) They maybe benign or malignant and presents with GI bleeding (40%), abdominal mass (40%), or abdominal pain (20%).

48 Histologic Criteria for GIST
Spindle cell (70%) Epitheliod type (20%) Mixed cell type (10%) Immunohistochemical staining CD 117 (+ in 95% cases) CD34 (+ in 70% cases) Smooth muscle actin (+ in 40% cases) PS100 (+ in 5% cases) Desmin (+ in 2% cases)

49 Prognositc value of grading is unclear
GIST from small intestine worse prognosis compared to gastric GIST 5 Year survival rate approximately 35-65% among patient complete resection Median survival months with unresectable disease

50 Is molecular biology for KIT and PDGFR mutation a diagnostic or research procedure for GIST?
KIT is a type III tyrosine receptor. KIT is required for the development of the intertitial cell of Cajal wjicj are the pacemaker of gut.

51 Intra-abdominal tumors suspected to be GIST in which CD117 is negative should be considered for molecular analysis for KIT or PRGFR mutation Mutation screening Formalin fixed paraffin embedded Frozen tumor sample

52 Recommended Imaging Study for GIST
CT Choice in suspected abdominal mass/biopsy Staging and surgical planning MRI Rectal GIST Fluorine 18 flurodeoxyglucose (FDR) positron emission tomography (PET) Early detection of tumor response to Imatinib treatment is required Images suspected to be metastatic Not mandatory

53 Laparoscopic surgery should be avoided
Standard Treatment Biopsy Preoperative Biopsy Tumors are fragile and bleed easily Intraabdominal Biopsy Discourage because of risk of tumor spill Complete resection of visible and microscopic disease should be done in established GIST ( avoiding the occurrence of tumor rupture and achieving negative margine) Laparoscopic surgery should be avoided Higher risk of tumor rupture

54 Resection vs watchful waiting
Lymphadenectomy Rarely metastisize to local regional lymph nodes Is warranted only for evident nodal involvement Resection vs watchful waiting All GIST potentially malignant All GIST need to be resected but not all intramural lesion are GIST, thus preoperative pathological diagnosis should be obtained

55 Adjuvant treatment with Imatinib: WHEN?

56 Imatinib Not considered as adjuvant therapy Remains investigational
A tyrosine kinase inhibitor blocking most mutated-activated KIT and PDRGFR Not considered as adjuvant therapy Remains investigational Might be able to eradicate microscopic disease but reduce the efficacy of treatment of recurrent GIST Not recommended in patients with localized GIST

57 Neo-adjuvant treatment with imatinib:
WHEN?

58 No data supports Not recommended outside clinical trials Unresectable GIST may be treated with preoperative imatinib in an attempt to achieve cytoreduction and organ presevation Radiotherapy as neo-adjuvant or adjuvant treatment not documented

59 Follow up after resection of primary tumor
No reliable data in published literature could support specific recommendation (whether beneficial or not) Proposal High and Intermediate risk Tumors >5cm or mitotic index >5/50hpf CT scan every 3-4 months for 3 years Then every 6 months until 5 years Low or very low risk Tumors <5cm or mitotic index <5/50 hpf CT scan every 6 months for 5 years

60 When should imatinib treatment be initiated in patient with advanced GIST?
For unresectable and/or metastatic disease, immediate treatment is recommended Disease spread to peritoneal surface or to the liver (metastasis), imatinib mesylate is the therapy of choice after resection

61 Optimal Dose 400mg/day is currently recommended
No overall survival improvement (400 and 800mg) Superiority of progression-free survival in 800mg

62 Duration imatinib treament with advanced GIST
Imatinib interruption after 1 year is associated with high risk of relapse Continues until progression, intolerance or patient refusal

63 Standard imaging strategy for advanced tumor
FDG PET highly sensitive in detecting early tumor response CT scan imaging modality of choice in response evaluation MRI option for liver metastasis Ultrasound is currently under investigation

64 Surgical resection of residual metastasis in patient in whom advanced disease is controlled by imatinib? No current data indicate that surgery alone may cure advanced GIST Imatinib should not be interrupted because of risk of tumor re-growth

65 Sunitinib Sugen, Biotech company focused on kinase inhibitors in oncology in 1999 FDA approved January 2006 Sutent (previously known as SU11248) Inhibits signaling through multiple receptor tyrosine kinase, including PDGF and VEGF receptors Inhibits mutationally activated kit kinase Diarrhea, hypertension, skin discoloration, mucositis, fatique, hypothyroidism, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, dec LV EF Wikipedia.org.sunitinib

66 Evaluation of malignancy and prognosis in 113 cases in Northern Italy
GIST represent are rare but well recognizable disease Risk of aggressive behavior is high >50% Finding that after radical surgery all tumors relapse American Society of Clinical Oncology 2004 ASCO Annual meeting

67 A Giant Malignant GIST of the Stomach: A Case Report
63/F, severe anemia, large abdominal mass on CT scan surgical resection done, later diagnosed with GIST on imatinib mesylate Phil Journal Internal Medicine 43:75-78 March -April 2005

68 Condition Rule in Rule out Peptic ulcer Abdominal pain
Diagnosed by EGD appendicitis Crampy abdominal pain; Nausea; Leukocytosis Gnawing; Anorexia, (-) rovsing;obturatot; psoas; mcburney sign Cholicystitis Abdominal distention Leukocytosis (-) murphy’s RUQ Fever pancreatits Abdominal pain/distention Nausea Non radiating (-) cullens sign (-) Turner sign Normal lipase IBS Recurrent abdominal pain; bloatness; altered stool form

69 Rule in Rule out Intestinal obstruction
Crampy abdominal pain; distention; constipation; Leucocytosis (-) borborygmi; vomiting Obstipation;Singultus Diarrhea;blood per rectum; Stepladder pattern PFA tumors

70 SPEC 19 (11/12/06) NA:138 BILI T: 1.4 K: 2.9 UA : 4.7
CL: 94 TP: 5.7 Trig: 82 ALB: 2.3 LDH: 304 CHOL: 168 SGOT: 92 UREA: 9.0 SGPT: 64 CREA:1.1 PHOS: 2.9 CPK: 176 CALC: 8.8 GLOB: 3.4 ALK P: 233 A/G : 0.70


Download ppt "MEDICAL GRANDROUNDS ERNEST JOEL SAMACO M.D. FEBUARY 1, 2007"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google