1. TESTING A PREACHER IN THE PHILIPPINES “Do you believe that Matthew 19:9 teaches that one man is to be married to one woman for one life with only one exception for a lawful divorce and remarriage and that being fornication (sexual violation of the marriage bed)?” “I believe one man one wife for a lifetime. What is wrong with my belief then?” (Nehemias A. Hayuhay) M.D.R. SPIN ZONE

2. “Do you believe there is ONLY ONE EXCEPTION for divorce and remarriage: and that being fornication (a sexual violation of the marriage bed?” “I believe Him who made the human beings from the beginning made them male and female. When God joined them together let no one put asunder.” (Nehemias A. Hayuhay) QUESTION AGAIN: M.D.R. SPIN ZONE

3. “Now, to the direct point of controversy, do you believe that if a man divorces his wife for any other reason than fornication (a sexual violation of the marriage bed) and marries another that he is in a state of adultery and remains so until he puts an end to that union? Don't dodge the issue because I do not have the time or patience for anyone who wants to.” What you consider CONTROVERSY in America is not applicable here in the Philippines. It has no bearing here since we have no divorce according to our FAMILY CODE. (Nehemias A. Hayuhay) QUESTION AGAIN, AGAIN: M.D.R. SPIN ZONE

4. "Do you believe that if a man divorces his wife for any other reason than fornication (a sexual violation of the marriage bed) and marries another that he is in a state of adultery and remains so until he puts and end to that union?" Was Jesus divorced? Was Paul divorced? Why then were they so concerned about it (Matt 19:1-9; 1 Cor. 7)? Do I have to be in adultery before I can be concerned about adultery? Do I have to be a murderer before I can be concerned with God's law on murder? Repent of your false doctrine and if you have been married before and were put away for adultery or divorced for something unscriptural then you must "remain unmarried" or be reconciled to the one that you were originally "bound" to (1 Cor. 7:10, 11). QUESTION AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN:

5. As I observed from our exchanges that you are more concern on MDR rather than DBR. Remember that the power of God for Salvation is the DBR (Gospel). The gospel teaches me to love my wife and be her husband, in sickness and in health, for reacher [sic] and for poor, till death do us part. What God had joined together let not man put asunder......Do you teach a faithful couple to be unfaithful to each other so that your agenda on MDR be satisfied? Do you intend to corrupt the mind of a faithful couple with your agenda on divorce and remarried? [sic] Or let them alone in thier [sic] faithfulness to each other? Are you divorce? [sic] If not, why are you so concern on divorcement? (Nehemias A. Hayuhay) Was Jesus divorced? Was Paul divorced? Why then were they so concerned about it (Matt 19:1-9; 1 Cor. 7)? Do I have to be in adultery before I can be concerned about adultery? Do I have to be a murderer before I can be concerned with God's law on murder? Repent of your false doctrine and if you have been married before and were put away for adultery or divorced for something unscriptural then you must "remain unmarried" or be reconciled to the one that you were originally "bound" to (1 Cor. 7:10, 11). M.D.R. SPIN ZONE

6. SO, WHEN YOU ASK A FALSE TEACHER “Do you believe there is ONLY ONE EXCEPTION for divorce and remarriage: and that being fornication?” HE RESPONDS: > WOULD YOU LIKE A TRANSLATION OF HIS ANSWER?

7. SO, WHEN YOU ASK A FALSE TEACHER “Do you believe there is ONLY ONE EXCEPTION for divorce and remarriage: and that being fornication?” HE RESPONDS: > TRAN: NO! LET THEM STAY IN ADULTERY! > TRAN: NO, LET THEM STAY IN ADULTERY!

8. "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery." MATTHEW 19:9 THE ANSWER IS SIMPLE...MEN MAKE IT COMPLICATED! OF ALL KINDS OF DIVORCEE’S THERE IS ONLY ONE KIND THAT IS GIVEN PERMISSION/GRANTED EXCEPTION BY GOD TO REMARRY

9. "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery."  ONE WHO BURNS BREAD?  ONE WHO SPENDS TOO MUCH $$$$?  ONE WHO LOVES CATS?  ONE WHO IS QUICK TEMPERED?  ONE WHO VIOLATES THE MARRIAGE BED WITH ANOTHER MAN (OR TODAY W/ ANOTHER WOMAN)?

10. WALLACE LITTLE & NEHEMIAS HAYUHAY (BOT) – SELECTIVE PREACHING “Mt 19:09 has no bearing here. In the Philippines, this is a totally moot subject. Bot declined to answer because of this, and his need to spend time studying and teaching those subjects that will benefit people here.” (WALLACE LITTLE) “What you consider CONTROVERSY in America is not applicable here in the Philippines. It has no bearing here since we have no divorce according to our FAMILY CODE.” (BOT) “The Philippine Constitution and supporting laws specifically forbid divorce. Claiming family protection laws and annulment are the equal to divorce and substitute for it...” (WALLACE LITTLE, http://www.nettling- nurturer.com/index.php3?CMD=GET_ARTICLE_NUMB&VALUE=210 ) http://www.nettling- nurturer.com/index.php3?CMD=GET_ARTICLE_NUMB&VALUE=210

11. THE ‘LITTLE BOT’ SPIN! “DIVORCE” AND REMARRIAGE IS A MOOT POINT TO ARGUE BECAUSE THERE IS NO DIVORCE ACCORDING TO THEIR “FAMILY CODE” THEREFORE, PREACHING ON “DIVORCE AND REMARRIAGE” WILL NOT BENEFIT THE PEOPLE HERE YET, LITTLE ADMITTED THAT, “Family protection laws deal in separation, NOT divorce. Annulment is possible, but takes years.” (http://www.nettling- nurturer.com/index.php3?CMD=GET_ARTICLE_NUMB&VALUE=210 )http://www.nettling- nurturer.com/index.php3?CMD=GET_ARTICLE_NUMB&VALUE=210 THEY HAVE MADE A BATTLE OVER SEMANTICS! (DIVORCE? SEPARATION? ANNULMENT?)

12. CALL IT WHAT YOU WILL! "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery." WHAT DOES “DIVORCE” MEAN? DOES MATTHEW 19:9 HAVE ANY RELEVANCE TO THE PHILIPPINES? IS GOD’S LAW ONLY CULTURAL?

13. CALL IT WHAT YOU WILL! "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery." “DIVORCE” TRANSLATED “PUT AWAY” (KJV; ASV) MEANING: “SEND AWAY” “REPUDIATE” “DISMISS” “RELEASE” ( apoluo; 630) “SEPARATION,” & “ANNULMENT” QUALIFY!

14. Mt 14:23 And when He had sent the multitudes away, He went up on the mountain by Himself to pray. Now when evening came, He was alone there. Mt 15:32 Now Jesus called His disciples to Himself and said, "I have compassion on the multitude, because they have now continued with Me three days and have nothing to eat. And I do not want to send them away hungry, lest they faint on the way." Mt 18:27 "Then the master of that servant was moved with compassion, released him, and forgave him the debt. Lu 13:12 But when Jesus saw her, He called her to Him and said to her, "Woman, you are loosed from your infirmity."

15. CALL IT WHAT YOU WILL! "And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery; and whoever marries her who is divorced commits adultery." PERHAPS THE ABBREVIATION IS NOT “MDR” BUT “MPR”? (MARRIAGE, PUT AWAY, REMARRIAGE) IS STILL A PROBLEM EVERYWHERE! DO FILIPINOS “SEND AWAY,” “LOOSE” THEIR SPOUSES? YES! THEN WHY NOT PREACH ON MATT 19?

16. THOSE WHO DO NOT TEACH GOD’S LAW REGARDING REMARRIAGE: FAIL PAUL’S EXAMPLE (ACTS 20:20) SHUN A PART OF THE “COUNSEL OF GOD” ARE GUILTY OF THE BLOOD OF MEN (ACTS 20:26, 27) ARE FAILURES FOR PREACHERS

17. NEHEMIAS HAYUHAY (BOT) CANNOT ANSWER SIMPLE QUESTION REGARDING TRUTH, BUT HE CAN CREATE CLOUDS OF OBSCURITY! “Like the Jews who were insisting CIRCUMCISION FOR SALVATION, Steve Wallace insisted MDR for salvation! That is sad...” A FOUL, FOOLISH AND LOATHSOME CHARGE WE INSIST THOSE IN ADULTERY TO ‘GET OUT’ IN ORDER TO “REPENT AND BE BAPTIZED” (ACTS 2:38; 1 COR. 6:9-11) CIRCUMCISION (O.T.); WILL BOT TELL US WHAT TESTAMENT MATTHEW 19:9 IS IN?

18. NEHEMIAS HAYUHAY (BOT) CREATING CLOUDS OF OBSCURITY! “Steve Wallace doesn't understand that I believe Galatians 5:19-21. He should also know that he who practice OUTBURSTS OF WRATH will not inherit the kingdom of God. Is there anyone of you can advise Steve Wallace not to get angry? I am worried about his soul!” YET HE DOESN’T BELIEVE GALATIANS 5:19-21 IS “GOSPEL” BOT WROTE: “ he can not prove that MDR is the gospel.” NOW THAT BOT WILL PREACH AGAINST ‘ANGER,’ WILL HE BEGIN PREACHING AGAINST ‘ADULTEROUS MARRIAGES?’

19. NEHEMIAS HAYUHAY (BOT) CREATING CLOUDS OF OBSCURITY! “Is there anyone of you can advise Steve Wallace not to get angry? I am worried about his soul! BOT SHOULD READ IN HIS BIBLE THAT ANGER IS NOT INHERENTLY EVIL! Ps 7:11, “God is a just judge, And God is angry with the wicked every day.” Ps 119:104, “Through Your precepts I get understanding; Therefore I hate every false way.” Ps 4:4 “Be angry, and do not sin. Meditate within your heart on your bed, and be still. Selah” (cf. Eph. 4:26).

20. One can be angry and not sin, but one cannot be in an adulterous marriage without sin!