1. Mississippi River Water Quality: Implications for Freshwater Diversions Coastal Wetland Planning, Preservation, and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) Outreach Committee Topic Series December 2001

2. 3)Specific performance and issues regarding water quality at freshwater diversion sites. Questions to consider... 2)Role and suitability of the Mississippi River as coastal restoration tool? 1)Geologic history of Louisiana and current situation regarding coastal wetlands loss?

3. What is the geologic history of coastal Louisiana?

4. World’s third largest river basin

5. Delta Age (years) Sale/Cypremort 4600-7000 Cocodrie3500-4600 Teche 2800-3500 St. Bernard 1000-2800 Lafourche 300-1000 Plaquemine 500-750 Modern/Balize500

6. The Great Flood of 1927

7. 160-200 million metric tons a year

8. 1956 2050 ? Predicted coastal land loss by 2050

9. Hydrologic - Diversions Vegetative Structural Coastal Restoration Methods

10. Pollution and Policy

11. National Environmental Policy Act -NEPA (1969) National Environmental Policy Act -NEPA (1969) Endangered Species Act (1973) Endangered Species Act (1973) Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (1947, 1970, 1972) (1947, 1970, 1972) Federal Water Pollution Control Act (1972, 1977) Federal Water Pollution Control Act (1972, 1977)

12. Section 402 – established National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program, requires permits for 4 major classes of storm water discharge and advocated use of Best Management Practices (BMPs) to minimize or eliminate the introduction of pollutants. Clean Water Act (1977) Section 319 establishes a national program for the assessment and control of non point source pollution impacts to state waters. Section 303 requires state list of impaired water bodies.

13. How suitable is the Mississippi River’s water quality today?

14. Detectable toxins below FDA thresholds LADEQ: Healthy fish populations of bass, catfish, buffalo, and shadLADEQ: Healthy fish populations of bass, catfish, buffalo, and shad Status of River Water Quality? In the Mississippi an impaired water body?

15. Samples collected along the entire length of River and distributaries. 5-year study to quantify types and distribution of contaminants.5-year study to quantify types and distribution of contaminants. Results? Status of River Water Quality

16. 11% 8% 22% 6% 23% 31% 51% of the nitrogen flux into the Gulf of Mexico comes from interior basins of the upper Mississippi watershed above the Missouri and Ohio Rivers. However, this section supplies only 22% of the total volume of River water entering the Gulf. Since the mid 1980s, large hypoxic areas have been documented in the near-shore waters off the Louisiana and Texas coast. However, there have been no documented hypoxic or low oxygen conditions in the mainstem ofthe Mississippi River. HYPOXIA 11% 8% 22% 6% 23% 31% 51% of the nitrogen flux into the Gulf of Mexico comes from interior basins of the upper Mississippi watershed above the Missouri and Ohio Rivers. However, this section supplies only 22% of the total volume of River water entering the Gulf. Since the mid 1980s, large hypoxic areas have been documented in the near-shore waters off the Louisiana and Texas coast. However, there have been no documented hypoxic or low oxygen conditions in the mainstem ofthe Mississippi River. HYPOXIA 11% 8% 22% 6% 23% 31% 51% of the nitrogen flux into the Gulf of Mexico comes from interior basins of the upper Mississippi watershed above the Missouri and Ohio Rivers. However, this section supplies only 22% of the total volume of River water entering the Gulf. Since the mid 1980s, large hypoxic areas have been documented in the near-shore waters off the Louisiana and Texas coast. However, there have been no documented hypoxic or low oxygen conditions in the mainstem ofthe Mississippi River. HYPOXIA 11% 8% 22% 6% 23% 31% HYPOXIA 11% 8% 22% 6% 23% 31% HYPOXIA Nutrients

17. Nitrogen Application (tons/m 2 /year) no data 20 Nutrients

18. Pesticides

19. St. Francisville 1000 900 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 Plaquemines Union Luling Belle Chase Venice Median Fecal Coliform (colonies/100 ml) 1977-84 1984-95 Source: USGS

20. Early Warning Organic Compound Detection System Toxic Release InventoryToxic Release Inventory Hypoxia monitoring Current Monitoring Programs

21. How have diversions affected water quality so far?

22. Caernarvon

23. 1812 Grand Bay Gardene 1849198719781960 Intermediate to Brackish (Historic) Modified from Gagliano and Wicker 1989 Big Mar Lake Bay Fienne Caernarvon 8000 cfs

24. Davis Pond

25. Most Successful Diversion?

26. “Normal” green vegetation 137,655 acres “Moderately Impacted” greenish/brown vegetation 143,935 acres “Severely Impacted or Dead” marsh is mostly brown, black, or totally devoid of vegetation 105,570 acres 35% 27% 38% “Brown Marsh” 2000-2001

27. Nutrients and some herbicides continue to cause concern. Mississippi River much cleaner than 30 years ago.Mississippi River much cleaner than 30 years ago. Successful regulatory action of point source discharge, improved sewage treatment, restriction/elimination of pesticides. Summary and Conclusions

28. River is suitable for most coastal restoration projects, but....River is suitable for most coastal restoration projects, but.... – Salinity and fisheries continue to be a major issue – Is the issue water quality or water clarity? – Can we maximize the interface and retention time of River input and marsh vegetation?

29. Acknowledgements