Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

I. Structural Aspects Sphere PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: Unit Cell Hand-Outs: 7.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "I. Structural Aspects Sphere PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: Unit Cell Hand-Outs: 7."— Presentation transcript:

1 I. Structural Aspects Sphere PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: Unit Cell Hand-Outs: 7

2 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: GeometryWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: PERIODIC a a  a = side of unit cell (Å, pm)  = angle between 2 sides =120  “Coordinate System” Unit Cell Hand-Outs: 7

3 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: GeometryWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: PERIODIC “A” a a  Unit Cell A: (0, 0) a = side of unit cell (Å, pm)  = angle between 2 sides =120  Hand-Outs: 7

4 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: GeometryWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: PERIODIC “A” a a  Unit Cell A: (0, 0) B: (1/3, 2/3) “B” a = side of unit cell (Å, pm)  = angle between 2 sides =120  Hand-Outs: 7

5 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: GeometryWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: PERIODIC “A” a a  Unit Cell A: (0, 0) B: (1/3, 2/3) C: (2/3, 1/3) “Fractional Coordinates” “B” “C” a = side of unit cell (Å, pm)  = angle between 2 sides =120  Hand-Outs: 7

6 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Three-Dimensions: Tetrahedron, ca. 79% Efficiency 70.5  Hand-Outs: 7

7 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Three-Dimensions: Tetrahedron, ca. 79% Efficiency 70.5  CANNOT fill 3D space with just tetrahedra! Hand-Outs: 7

8 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Three-Dimensions: Tetrahedron, ca. 79% Efficiency 70.5  CANNOT fill 3D space with just tetrahedra! Three-Dimensions: PERIODIC (Closest Packing: ca. 74% Efficiency) 1 st Layer: over “A” sites (0, 0) 2 nd Layer: over “B” sites (1/3, 2/3) Hand-Outs: 7

9 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Hexagonally Closest Packed HCP Cubic Closest Packed CCP = FCC A B A B A B C A  ABAB   h  “h” = “BAB” or “CBC” or …  ABCABC   c  “c” = “ABC” or “BCA” or … Jagodzinski Symbol c Coordination Environments Hand-Outs: 8

10 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Hexagonally Closest Packed HCP Cubic Closest Packed CCP = FCC A B A B A B C A  ABAB   h  “h” = “BAB” or “CBC” or … Unit Cell c-axis: 2 closest packed layers c/a =  (8/3) = 1.633 A: (0, 0, 0); B: (1/3, 2/3, 1/2)  ABCABC   c  “c” = “ABC” or “BCA” or … Unit Cell c-axis: 3 closest packed layers c/a = (  (8/3)(3/2) =  6 =  3 / (1/  2) A: (0, 0, 0); B: (1/3, 2/3, 1/3); C: (2/3, 1/3, 2/3) Jagodzinski Symbol c Hand-Outs: 8

11 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 La (DHCP): B C A A A  ABACABAC  Sm:  hhc  Examples: Hand-Outs: 8

12 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 La (DHCP): B C A A A  ABACABAC   hchchc  “  hc  ” Sm:  hhc  =  BABACACBCBAB  Examples: Hand-Outs: 8

13 Number of CP Layers in Unit Cell Number of Different Sequences Stacking Sequence Jagodzinski Symbol 21  AB  h  31  ABC  c  41  ABAC  hc  51 62 73 86 97 1016 1121 1243 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Closest PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Exercise: Fill in the Blanks, at Least for 5-8 layers Hand-Outs: 9

14 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Packing EfficienciesWells, pp. 141-161 Body-Centered Cubic Packing Unit Cell Efficiency = 2V sphere / V cell Hand-Outs: 10

15 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Packing EfficienciesWells, pp. 141-161 Body-Centered Cubic Packing Efficiency = 2V sphere / V cell V cell = a 3 R sphere = (  3/4)a V sphere = (4  /3)(R sphere ) 3 = (  3  /16)a 3 Unit Cell a 2a2a Hand-Outs: 10

16 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Packing EfficienciesWells, pp. 141-161 CNNameSphere Density 6Simple Cubic0.5236 8Simple Hexagonal0.6046 8 + 6Body-Centered Cubic0.6802 10Body-Centered Tetragonal0.6981 11Tetragonal Close-Packing0.7187 12Closest Packing0.7405 Body-Centered Cubic Packing Unit Cell a 2a2a Coordination Environment Efficiency = 2V sphere / V cell = (  3  /8) = 0.6802 V cell = a 3 R sphere = (  3/4)a V sphere = (4  /3)(R sphere ) 3 = (  3  /16)a 3 Hand-Outs: 10

17 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 How to Quickly Draw a Closest Packing: Projection of 2 closest packed planes Hand-Outs: 11

18 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 How to Quickly Draw a Closest Packing: Hand-Outs: 11

19 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 How to Quickly Draw a Closest Packing: Hand-Outs: 11

20 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 Octahedral “Holes” (Voids): 2 closest packed layers: 1 octahedral void / 2 atoms  closest packed layers : 1 octahedral void / 1 atom Hand-Outs: 11

21 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 Octahedral “Holes” (Voids): 2 closest packed layers: 1 octahedral void / 2 atoms  closest packed layers : 1 octahedral void / 1 atom HCP: share faces, edges  AcBcAcBc  CCP: share edges, corners  AcBaCbAcBaCb  A B c Hand-Outs: 11

22 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 Tetrahedral “Holes” (Voids): 2 closest packed layers: 2 tetrahedral voids / 2 atoms  closest packed layers : 2 tetrahedral void / 1 atom Hand-Outs: 11

23 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Interstitial SitesWells, pp. 141-161 Tetrahedral “Holes” (Voids): 2 closest packed layers: 2 tetrahedral voids / 2 atoms  closest packed layers : 2 tetrahedral void / 1 atom HCP: share faces, edges  AbaBabAbaBab  CCP: share edges, corners  AbaBcbCacAbaBcbCac  A B a b Hand-Outs: 11

24 I. Structural Aspects Sphere Packings: Radius RatiosWells, pp. 141-161 Coordination Number Optimum Radius Ratio Coordination Polyhedron 40.225Tetrahedron 60.414Octahedron 0.528Trigonal Prism 80.732Cube 90.732Tricapped Trigonal Prism 120.902Icosahedron 1.000Cuboctahedron (ccp) 1.000Triangular Orthobicupola (hcp) Octahedral Hole Hand-Outs: 11

25 I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Atoms and ions are not “hard spheres;” What factors inflence “atomic radii”? Hand-Outs: 12

26 Atoms and ions are not “hard spheres;” What factors inflence “atomic radii”? (1) Repulsive Forces: approach of uncharged atoms with filled valence subshells (van der Waals radii) (2) Attractive Forces: effective nuclear charge; orbital overlap; electrostatic (metallic, covalent or ionic radii) I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 12

27 Atoms and ions are not “hard spheres;” What factors inflence “atomic radii”? (1) Repulsive Forces: approach of uncharged atoms with filled valence subshells (van der Waals radii) (2) Attractive Forces: effective nuclear charge; orbital overlap; electrostatic (metallic, covalent or ionic radii) Scales of Atomic and Ionic Radii: Slater, Goldschmidt, Pauling – empirical, based on extensive surveys of interatomic distances. Some corrected for coordination numbers, ionicity, valence bond types, etc. I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 12

28 Metallic Radii: CN = 12 For ideal cp structures (CCP, HCP with c/a = 1.63):R 12 = d / 2 For distorted cp structures:R 12 =  d  / 2 For lower CN: Relative Metallic Radii (Goldschmidt) CN = 8:R 8 = 0.97 R 12 CN = 6:R 6 = 0.96 R 12 CN = 4:R 4 = 0.88 R 12 I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 12

29 M(s)  M(g) Filling M-M Bonding States Filling M-M Antibonding States Minimum Radii Maximum Cohesive E. I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 13

30 Metallic Radii: CN = 12 For ideal cp structures (CCP, HCP with c/a = 1.63):R 12 = d / 2 For distorted cp structures:R 12 =  d  / 2 For lower CN: Relative Metallic Radii (Goldschmidt) CN = 8:R 8 = 0.97 R 12 CN = 6:R 6 = 0.96 R 12 CN = 4:R 4 = 0.88 R 12 Estimation Strategies: (1) Constant V atom (How to estimate R 12 from BCC elements (R 8 )) FCC vs. BCC:V atom = (a FCC ) 3 / 4 = (a BCC ) 3 / 2 d FCC = 2R 12 = a FCC /  2 d BCC = 2R 8 =  3 a BCC / 2 Therefore, R 8 = 0.972 R 12 I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 12-13

31 Metallic Radii: CN = 12 For ideal cp structures (CCP, HCP with c/a = 1.63):R 12 = d / 2 For distorted cp structures:R 12 =  d  / 2 For lower CN: Relative Metallic Radii (Goldschmidt) CN = 8:R 8 = 0.97 R 12 CN = 6:R 6 = 0.96 R 12 CN = 4:R 4 = 0.88 R 12 Estimation Strategies: (1) Constant V atom (2) Use alloys that show close packed structures, e.g., Ag 3 Sb (HCP) – provides R 12 (Sb) I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 12-13

32 Metallic Radii: CN = 12 For ideal cp structures (CCP, HCP with c/a = 1.63):R 12 = d / 2 For distorted cp structures:R 12 =  d  / 2 For lower CN: Relative Metallic Radii (Goldschmidt) CN = 8:R 8 = 0.97 R 12 CN = 6:R 6 = 0.96 R 12 CN = 4:R 4 = 0.88 R 12 Estimation Strategies: (1) Constant V atom (2) Use alloys that show close packed structures, e.g., Ag 3 Sb (HCP) – provides R 12 (Sb) (3) Linear extrapolation of solid solutions of the element in a close packed metal. I. Structural Aspects Atomic and Ionic Sizes Wells, pp. 287-291, 312-321, 1286-1295 Hand-Outs: 12-13


Download ppt "I. Structural Aspects Sphere PackingsWells, pp. 141-161 Densest Packing of Spheres Two-Dimensions: Unit Cell Hand-Outs: 7."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google