Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

“Evaluating the impact of a regional approach to babyClear, and tackling the high levels of maternal smoking in North East England” 2015 UKNSCC, Manchester.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "“Evaluating the impact of a regional approach to babyClear, and tackling the high levels of maternal smoking in North East England” 2015 UKNSCC, Manchester."— Presentation transcript:

1 “Evaluating the impact of a regional approach to babyClear, and tackling the high levels of maternal smoking in North East England” 2015 UKNSCC, Manchester Martyn Willmore Fresh Smoke Free North East

2 Overview o Current NE position on maternal smoking o What we`ve done to address this o What the data is telling us o Lessons learned in terms of stop smoking support o We await the academic evaluation of babyClear o Acknowledgements and thanks go to: o Hilary Wareing and Tobacco Control Collaborating Centre o Newcastle University team o Teesside University team o Eugene Milne o Jane Beenstock o NE Heads of Midwifery o NE SSS providers & commissioners

3 The North East & Maternal Smoking o SATOD rates across NE have been consistently high since data started o They don`t reflect progress made in NE adult/youth smoking levels o We recognise that maternal smoking is not just a “pregnancy issue” or a cessation issue o Yet we felt we needed to do more to improve our systems to support pregnant smokers to quit

4 BabyClear So after months of negotiations and work done with key partners, we started to implement babyClear o Systematic approach to CO monitoring and referral by midwives at first booking appointment o “Risk Perception” intervention by midwife at time of scan clinic o Skills training for midwives and SSS staff (advisers and admin teams) o Clarifying referral pathways/systems o Supply of all related materials in Year One

5 BabyClear planned roll-out

6 BabyClear actual roll-out

7 Changes in SSS models o Throughout the implementation, we faced a changing landscape (e.g. CCGs, maternity teams, LAs Public Health) o But one of the biggest challenges was the move from 6 SSS to effectively 10 separate SSS with a variety of models: No specialists and pregnant women seen by any willing provider No specialists, but clearly defined pregnancy advisors Traditional hub & spoke model with pregnancy specialist advisors DarlingtonNorth TynesideCounty Durham GatesheadNorthumberland South TynesideNorth Tees SunderlandSouth Tees* Newcastle**

8 Resources provided o Two-hour training for all staff who do booking appointments o Around 450 attendees o Train the trainer support for localities o Approx. 350 picobaby CO monitors provided o All-day training for small cohort of risk perception midwives o Around 55 North East midwives attended o 20 maternity units provided with relevant software/CO monitor o One-day training for 28 SSS hub administrative staff o One or two day SSS pregnancy advisor training for 117 staff

9 Change in number of quit dates set by pregnant women (Q1-3 12/13 vs. 14/15)

10

11 Estimated % of pregnant smokers using SSS in 2014/15 and validated quit rates

12 SSS models – some thoughts o There is no obvious correlation between having a “specialist-delivered” SSS and outcomes o But having specified pregnancy providers is vital in terms of achieving quality outcomes o If non-specialist providers are active, well-trained and supported (usually by hub), their quit rates can be good o ……but, if specialist provision is removed without a clear handover strategy, we`ve seen major disruption o Real difference in attendance levels with arranged one-to- one sessions, rather than drop-ins

13 Other thoughts…. o Having stop smoking advisors on-site after dating scan increases engagement. As do morning scans o Yet, there are on-going practical issues around triaging smokers into dedicated scan clinics o CO screening at every opportunity is vital o Challenges around who provides CO equipment post- implementation (we are clear it should not be the SSS) o Smoking rates at booking vary hugely. From 15% to 50% o Attendance rates at first appointment also vary significantly

14 Change in NE local smoking at time of delivery rate (Q1-3 14/15 vs.11/12)

15 Change in regional smoking at time of delivery rate (Q1-3 14/15 vs.11/12)

16 What next? o Ensure babyClear (especially the risk perception element) is routinely embedded. Possibly extend beyond midwives? o Await formal evaluation of babyClear, in terms of attitudinal changes (staff and patients), and impact on birth outcomes o More PR/Media about reasons to quit o Greater use of mobile phones/Apps/online resources? o Incentives? We see the evidence building up in support of well-structured financial incentives o Greater insight into North East pregnant smokers?

17 Summary o Taken longer to get to this point than expected o Partly due to extent of change in the system o Still variation across region (in both midwifery and SSS support), but less than before o babyClear still reliant on the SSS model and the support of maternity teams o We can`t just treat tackling smoking in pregnancy as an isolated issue o Signs of progress, but still a long way to go

18 Contact details…. info@freshne.com martyn.willmore@freshne.com 0191 333 7140 www.freshne.com https://twitter.com/freshsmokefree


Download ppt "“Evaluating the impact of a regional approach to babyClear, and tackling the high levels of maternal smoking in North East England” 2015 UKNSCC, Manchester."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google