Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Internet & Evaluation Frederic Murray Assistant Professor

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Internet & Evaluation Frederic Murray Assistant Professor"— Presentation transcript:

1 Internet & Evaluation Frederic Murray Assistant Professor
MLIS, University of British Columbia BA, Political Science, University of Iowa Instructional Services Librarian Al Harris Library Intro to Information Literacy

2 The Internet is… a worldwide collection of computer networks
ubiquitous

3 Web Searching is easy because…..
Speed Choice Availability 24/7 Always get an answer

4 Web searching is difficult because …
Organization Quality control Reliability

5 Anatomy of a URL

6 Web Evaluation Techniques
Domain name appropriate for the content ? Restricted: edu, gov, mil, a few country codes (ca) Unrestricted: com, org, net, most country codes (us, uk)

7 Domain Names Which one is right? Whois.net .gov .org .mil .com .edu
Whois.net .gov .org .mil .com .edu .net .int Indicates a reliable domain name

8 Web Evaluation Techniques
Published by an entity that makes sense ? News from its source? Advice from valid agency?

9 Remember to Evaluate!!! Authority Who created it? Who is responsible?
What credentials do they hold? What makes them qualified to discuss the topic? Accuracy Can the information be verified? Check the facts! Objectivity How is the information being presented? Is it objective or biased? What’s the point of view? Currency (important based on subject) When was it published? When was it last updated?

10 Step 1: Authority Web Pages Credentials/Qualifications/Reputation
Who is responsible for content? Is it a commercial site? Is it a government site? Is it an education site?

11 Step 1: Authority: Questions
1. Who is responsible for the content? Domain name? What does this indicate? If you don't recognize the name, or there is no name, what type of information is given about the contact information? - Position? - Organizational affiliation? - address? - Biographical information?

12 Step 2: Accuracy Web Pages Can the information be verified?
Links to credible sites Copyright Works Cited Fact check with a printed source

13 Step 2: Accuracy Does the website cite sources used to present its information? What type of sources are they? Scholarly? Popular? Is it possible to verify the legitimacy of these sources? If the site is research-based, does the website clearly identify the method of research and the data gathered?

14 Do you trust the author or organization providing the information?
Step 3: Objectivity Biased or Objective? Sponsoring Organization Agendas Political Propaganda Web hosting Do you trust the author or organization providing the information?

15 Do you trust the author or organization providing the information?
Step 3: Objectivity Determine what is the aim of the author or organization publishing the site. What is the purpose of the web site? 1. Is it advertisement for a product or service? 2. Is it for political purposes? 3. Is it trying to sway public opinion on a social issue? Do you trust the author or organization providing the information?

16 Step 4: Currency Web Pages When was it created and last updated?
Well maintained web sites have an indication when it was last updated or modified Accessibility Dead links Stability Changes URLs frequently

17 Step 4: Currency 1. Is a date clearly displayed?
2. Can you determine what the date refers to? When the page was first written? When the page was first posted on the Internet? When the page was last revised or updated? The copyright date? 3. Are the resources used by the author current? 4. Does the page content demand routine or continual updating or revision? 5. Do the links on the page point to the correct Internet site addresses?

18 Remember to Evaluate!!! Authority Who created it? Who is responsible?
What credentials do they hold? What makes them qualified to discuss the topic? Accuracy Can the information be verified? Check the facts! Objectivity How is the information being presented? Is it objective or biased? What’s the point of view? Currency (important based on subject) When was it published? When was it last updated?

19 Exercise: Evaluation Handout
Institute for Historical Review Boston Dynamics Havidol Pinehearst Company Investigative Dashboard Breyer State University

20 Google Larry Page & Sergey Brin/ Grad Students 1998
Mission: "to organize the world's information and make it universally accessible and useful.“ 2007: 23 Billion dollar corporation

21 Google: Improve Your Searches
Site Specific Command What it does: searches only specific domains What to type: children's health site:edu children's health site:gov

22 Web vs. Library Databases
Research Based Books & Articles Full-text Resources Authoritative & Peer-reviewed Materials Information about People & Cultures Easier to Search AND, OR, NOT Specific Subjects Web Good for current events Statistical Information Pop Culture Opinion Information about Organizations & Groups Need to Evaluate!

23 Google Scholar Google Scholar provides a simple way to search for scholarly literature. Search across many disciplines and sources: peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, abstracts and articles, from academic publishers, professional societies, preprint repositories, universities and other scholarly organizations.

24 Google Scholar Works best for Citations Restrictions to Content
Fee-based Often your Library already owns material We’re working on improving access Example: Tribal Colleges Find: Tribal Colleges Gaining Digital Access to Worldwide Library Resources. A periodical search will take me to the article

25 Wikipedia Wiki: A Web application that allows users to add content to a collaborative hypertext Web resource (coauthoring), as in an Internet forum, and permits others to edit that content (open editing).

26 Wikipedia Jimmy Wales January 15, 2001 No Original Research
NPOV (Neutral point of view) No owners, multiple anonymous authors Anyone with Internet access can create or edit an entry…Anyone

27 Wikipedia Contributors: male, English speaking, denizens of the Internet. Problem is not that it disregards the facts, but that it elevates them above all else. Most of the content is discussion/history of edits & not the entries themselves. Rosenzweig, Roy. “Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past.” The Journal of American History (2006):

28 Wikipedia Participation maps popular, not academic concerns
It is a working community…but is it a good historical resource? Lack of Critical Analysis Problematic as a sole source of information Like all encyclopedias…ok to start, terrible place to stop. Benefits are to its active participants, not its readers.

29 Writing Your Paper Writing Center MLA Style
Located in the basement of the library Call for appointment # MLA Style Style Sheets MLA Handbook at Reference & Circulation Desk

30 Questions? Contact me: Frederic Murray 774-7113

31 Thanks!


Download ppt "Internet & Evaluation Frederic Murray Assistant Professor"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google