1. AIM Virtual FRB Meetings 22-23 Sep, 2008 1000 & 1400 Both Days

2. Agenda Introductions Feedback on AIM User Community Survey Software Status Software Plans – Modernization Functional Enhancements Review of Draft November FRB Agenda

3. AIM-based Learning Content* Big “3” Example Others include: NSWC SPAWAR NMPT&E NSTC CNL CNE CID CEODD *Data captured in 4 th Quarter of FY07

4. AIM User Community Survey Findings 414 Contacts –36% reached 60% of those Government, 40% Contractors –10 individuals have promised but not submitted data Content Hours Developed- 148,198 hrs –Aviation: 25,313 hrs –Sub: 28,064 hrs –Surface: 6,840 hrs –Other: 87,981 hrs Training –618 users self-identified as trained –896 users need/requested training in FY09 AIM Usage –Most now using AIM 3.3 (AIM I & AIM II)

5. Software Status AIM I/II Rel 3.2.1 – Superseded by Rel 3.3 AIM I/II Rel 3.3 – NMCI certified in May 08 – Pushed to NMCI end users in Jun-Jul 08 – Includes first version of Learning Object (LO) Module – Central site Citrix Metaframe enhancements – CMS Web service interface to CeTARS Content Planning Module (CPM) 3.0 – GAT conducted May 08 – Operational s/w posted Jun 08

6. Software Plans - Modernization AIM I/II Rel 4.0 – LO Module  Initial GAT conducted Jun 08  Significant additional functionality being coded now; in work for Mar 09 delivery for testing  Anticipated NMCI push Jun 09 – CPM  Significant additional functionality being coded now; in work for Mar 09 delivery for testing  Anticipated operational Jun 09 – Interim builds available to support ongoing ILE projects – FRB-prioritized ACRs incorporated in LP/TG modules

7. Software Plans – Modernization (contd) AIM I/II Rel 4.1 – LO Module  requirements define by FRB feedback on FRM  planned delivery for GAT and NMCI testing in Mar ‘10  anticipated NMCI push in Jun ‘10 – CPM  requirements defined by FRB feedback on Functional Reqts Matrix  planned delivery for GAT testing in Mar ‘10  Operational in Jun ‘10 – Interim builds available to support ongoing ILE projects – FRB-prioritized ACRs incorporated in LP/TG modules

8. AIM Functional Enhancements Governance Process –Voting, Priorities, Funding, etc. AIM I/II Change Request –Summary –Distribution for Review and Prioritization AIM Modernized Functional Requirements Matrix –Summary –Distribution for Review and Prioritization

9. FRB Governance Process Software requirements –All FRB attendees encouraged to review and comment on AIM Change Request (ACR) and Modernization Functional Requirements Matrix (FRM) Enhancement priorities –ACR and FRM lists will be discussed by whole group, based on pre-meeting inputs –Each participating Center and SYSCOM will have one vote in determining final priorities for upcoming releases

10. Review of Draft November FRB Agenda Comments? Proposed Additions/Deletions? Other?

11. Jake Aplanalp - AIM/CPM Program Manager NAWCTSD Orlando jacob.aplanalp@navy.miljacob.aplanalp@navy.mil (407) 380-4685 Ron Zinnato – AIM SSO (System Support Office) NAWCTSD Orlando ronald.zinnato@navy.milronald.zinnato@navy.mil (407) 380-4667 Jim Ferrall - Program Manager Columbus Technologies jferrall@columbususa.comjferrall@columbususa.com (703) 494-1416 Paul Graf - Technical, Functional and ISD Support pgraf@columbususa.compgraf@columbususa.com (443) 276-4106 AIM Website – http://aim.aimertech.com/AIMhttp://aim.aimertech.com/AIM Contacts Questions?