Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Adolescent Narcissism and the Double Edge of Risk and Adaptation Daniel K. LapsleyMichael Earley Ball State University O’Dea High School Nathan M. Dumford.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Adolescent Narcissism and the Double Edge of Risk and Adaptation Daniel K. LapsleyMichael Earley Ball State University O’Dea High School Nathan M. Dumford."— Presentation transcript:

1 Adolescent Narcissism and the Double Edge of Risk and Adaptation Daniel K. LapsleyMichael Earley Ball State University O’Dea High School Nathan M. Dumford Miami University SRA 2006 San Francisco

2 Narcissism has “two faces” Narcissism as adaptation  narcissism as defensive compensatory stance that helps adolescents cope with sep-ind  narcissism supports self-extension, ambition, creativity, growth Narcissism as self-pathology or personality disorder

3 The study of adolescent narcissism requires new assessment strategies Three studies chart development of a theoretically-derived adolescent narcissism scale

4 Theoretical Considerations Adolescent narcissism emerges for good developmental reasons to cope with self-vulnerabilities that attend separation-individuation subjective omnipotence

5 Narcissistic omnipotence… …”denotes a defensive and reactive heightening of self-esteem to cope with inner feelings of low self-worth, depressive mood and empty feelings” --Sarnoff (1987)

6 Study 1 examined relationship between subjective omnipotence (personal fable) and narcissism (NPI) risk behavior internalizing symptoms positive adjustment

7 Study 1 Participants 222 8 th -graders (101 males, M age = 13.39) 142 10 th -graders (72 males, M age = 15.43) 102 12 th -graders (46 males, M age = 17.45) N = 467

8 Study 1 Omnipotence (α =.79) NPI (α =.83) Internalizing Symptoms  Children’s Depression Inventory (α = =.86)  CES-D suicidal ideation (α =.86) Risk Behavior  Rowe: “Delinquent” risk behavior (α =.92)  Substance use (α = =.74) Positive adjustment  SIQYA: Mastery Coping (α =.76)  SIQYA: Superior Adjustment (α =.70)

9 Internalizing SymptomsOmnipotenceNPI Depression-.53-.28 Suicidal Ideation-.37-.17 Risk Behavior ns.23 Substance Use-.11ns Positive Adjustment Mastery Coping.55.43 Superior Adjustment.52.45 Narcissism (NPI).65--

10 Omnipotence strongly associated with mastery coping and adjustment counterindicates depression counterindicates suicidal ideation converges with NPI narcissism sex effect (favoring males)

11 Study 2 standard scale development procedures yields 33 item scale EFA 228 undergraduates  (73 males, M age = 21.85) 3 factors retained  scree and parallel analysis criteria  40% of the variance

12 Three Factors Omnipotent Action/Control  “Everybody knows that I am in charge”  12 items (α =.85) Omnipotent Leadership  “I would make a great leader because of my abilities”  13 items (α =.83) Omnipotent Influence  “I influence how others behave”  7 items (α =.80)

13 Other Measures CES-Depression Adolescent Invulnerability Scale Delinquent Risk Behavior

14 OmnipotenceNPI ActionLeadershipInfluence Risk Behavior.16.13.31.39 Depressionns-.21ns-.19 Invulnerability.26.14.35 NPI Narcissism.44.57.40--

15 Summary Omnipotence scales converge with NPI- Narcissism Omnipotence scales show differential relationship with risk behavior and depressive symptoms

16 Study 3 Document convergent validity in younger sample (using NPI-C) Distinguish adolescent narcissism from self- worth Explore relationship between narcissism and separation-individuation

17 Study Details N = 142 males (M age ) = 16 Instruments  Adolescent Omnipotence Scale Action (α =.83) Leadership (α =.80) Influence (α =.80)  Narcissistic Personality Inventory-C (α =.86)  Self-Perception Profile (α’s =.53 to.85)  Dysfunctional Separation-Individuation Self Dysfunctional S-I (α =.68) Relational Dysfunctional S-I (α =.73)  Self-Image Questionnaire for Young Adolescents Mastery Coping (α =.76) Superior Adjustment (α =.79)

18 Omnipotence Scales LeadershipActionInfluence NPI-C.64.61.51 Vanity.29.32.27 Authority.66.60.52 Exhibitionism.33.23.26 Superiority.39.41.23 Entitlement.18.29.24 Exploitativeness.41.39.41 Self-Sufficiency.53.39

19 Omnipotence Scales NPI-CLeadershipActionInfluence Mastery Coping.19.30ns Superior Adjustment.26.44.29.27 Dysfunctional Sep-Ind ns.20 Self Dysfunctional Sep-Ind -.31-.19ns Relational Dysfunctional Sep-Ind ns.17.29

20 Omnipotence Scales Self-WorthNPI-CLeadershipActionInfluence Romantic-.36-.42-.40-.36 Social-.26-.34ns-.31 Athletic-.32-.29ns Conscience/ Moral ns-.23-.21ns Appearance -.20ns

21 Summary Omnipotence converges with narcissism omnipotence scales associated with indices of positive adjustment are related to dysfunctional sep-ind counterindicate self-worth in test of means:  younger Ss more feelings of subjective omnipotence than older Ss

22 General Conclusions theoretically-derived and reliable measure of adolescent narcissism  factors converge with NPI and NPI-C  predict adolescent risk behavior  counterindicates internalizing affect  positively associated with mastery coping and adjustment which may be compensatory  association with dysfunctional sep-ind  low scores on several dimensions of self-worth


Download ppt "Adolescent Narcissism and the Double Edge of Risk and Adaptation Daniel K. LapsleyMichael Earley Ball State University O’Dea High School Nathan M. Dumford."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google