Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2013.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2013."— Presentation transcript:

1 Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2013

2 NLRSD Student Enrollment

3 NLRSD Enrollment Breakdown

4 Elementary Accreditation Status Amboy Elementary- Fully Accredited Boone Park Elementary- Fully Accredited Crestwood Elementary- Fully Accredited Glenview Elementary- Fully Accredited Indian Hills Elementary- Fully Accredited Lakewood Elementary- Fully Accredited Lynch Drive Elementary- Fully Accredited Meadow Park Elementary - Fully Accredited North Heights Elementary - Fully Accredited Park Hill Elementary - Fully Accredited Pike View Elementary - Fully Accredited Redwood Preschool – Fully Accredited Seventh Street Elementary - Fully Accredited

5 Secondary Accreditation Status Ridgeroad Middle School – Fully Accredited Lakewood Middle School – Fully Accredited North Little Rock Academy – Fully Accredited North Little Rock High School – Fully Accredited

6

7 ESEA P RELIMINARY S TATUS FOR 2012-2013 A CCOUNTABILITY S TATUS D ESCRIPTION ADE E NGAGEMENT / D ISTRICT A UTONOMY E XEMPLARY  H IGH PERFORMANCE  H IGH PROGRESS  H IGH TAGG HIGH PERFORMANCE  H IGH TAGG HIGH PROGRESS V ERY L OW ADE ENGAGEMENT /V ERY H IGH DISTRICT AUTONOMY A CHIEVING  M EET ALL 3- YR PERFORMANCE RATE, GROWTH RATE AND GROWTH AMO S FOR A LL S TUDENTS AND TAGG  M EET ALL 1- YR PERFORMANCE AND GRADUATION RATE AMO S FOR A LL S TUDENTS AND TAGG, BUT MISS GROWTH AMO S FOR A LL S TUDENTS OR TAGG V ERY L OW ADE ENGAGEMENT /H IGH DISTRICT AUTONOMY N EEDS I MPROVEMENT  D OES NOT MEET PERFORMANCE, GRADUATION RATE OR GROWTH AMO S FOR A LL S TUDENTS AND TAGG L OW TO M ODERATE ADE ENGAGEMENT /M ODERATE DISTRICT AUTONOMY N EEDS I MPROVEMENT F OCUS  S CHOOLS WITH LARGEST, PERSISTENT GAPS BETWEEN N ON -TAGG AND TAGG H IGH ADE ENGAGEMENT / L OW DISTRICT AUTONOMY N EEDS I MPROVEMENT P RIORITY  S CHOOLS WITH PERSISTENTLY LOWEST ACHIEVEMENT IN MATH AND LITERACY OVER THREE YEARS FOR A LL S TUDENTS V ERY H IGH ADE ENGAGEMENT /L OW DISTRICT AUTONOMY

8 North Little Rock School Status Priority schools include the bottom 5% of schools with the lowest levels of student performance. Focus schools include 10% of Title I schools with the largest TAGG/Non-TAGG achievement gaps. Needs Improvement schools scored above the bottom 5%, and do not have significant achievement gaps between their TAGG/Non- TAGG. Needs Improvement schools have at least one academic area or subgroup needing advancement. Achieving schools met all their performance goals in 2013 for their TAGG and combine population. Exemplary schools include the top 1% of schools that had high performance, high TAGG and high progress. Focus schools- Crestwood, Indian Hills, Lynch Drive (status pending), No. Heights, Pike View, Seventh Street, Lakewood Middle Needs Improvement schools- Amboy, Lakewood Elementary, Meadow Park, Park Hill, Ridgeroad Middle, North Little Rock High, North Little Rock Academy, NLRSD Achieving Schools- Glenview, Boone Park

9 2013 Math Performance AMO DID NOT MEET 2013 AMOs

10 2013 Literacy Performance AMO

11 Spring ACTAAP 2013 620 students tested 675 students tested 652 students tested 620 students tested 675 students tested 652 students tested

12 NLRSD Elementary Longitudinal Math Performance

13 NLRSD Elementary Longitudinal Literacy Performance

14 Elementary Areas of Focus/Goals  Cognitively Guided Instruction (CGI)  Reflex Math  STAR Math Assessment  Use of Math Coaches in some schools  Math Curriculum Maps/Units have been revised and developed  More Technology use by students and teachers  After School Programs targeted to meet the differentiated, prescriptive needs of struggling learners

15 2013 Math Performance AMO DID NOT MEET 2012 AMOs

16 2013 Literacy Performance AMO DID NOT MEET 2012 AMOs

17 Spring ACTAAP 2013 43 students tested 598 students tested 618 students tested 607 students tested 600 students tested 557 students tested 618 students tested 607 students tested 600 students tested

18 NLRSD Secondary Longitudinal Math Performance

19 NLRSD Secondary Longitudinal Math Performance

20 NLRSD Secondary Longitudinal Literacy Performance

21 Current 9 th Grade Cohort

22

23 Secondary Areas of Focus/Goals  Credit Recovery  Change in grade level coding  Sequencing of math courses  College and Career Readiness Skills  Common Core Unit Development

24 NLRSD Graduation AMOs (high schools only)  Baseline graduation rates for 2011 were used to determine AMOs.  4-year adjusted cohort graduation rate represents the percentage of students graduating out of the students expected to graduate.  Percentage of students not graduating in 2011-2012 were calculated for each school for All Students, TAGG and NCLB subgroups.

25 Cohort Subgroup 2012: # of Students (587) 2012: % of Cohort 2011: # of Students (863) 2011: % of Cohort % of Change On-Time Graduates 43073.2%53762.2% 11% Non- Graduates (4 years) 15726.8%32637.8%

26 NLRSD Graduation Rate Cont. Students can only be removed from their graduation cohort if he/she has not repeated a grade while enrolled in your district and: 1.Enrolled in another school in Arkansas 2.Death 3.Enrolled in private school 4.Enrolled in home school 5.Enrolled in another school out of state

27 Cohort Subgroup# of Students (587)% of Cohort Enrolled at Another School & Repeated 12Students who left our district on grade level for any of these reasons will not reflect in our graduation rate. Home School & Repeated1 Moved Out of State & Repeated 1 Total142.4% Cohort Subgroup# of Students (587)% of Cohort Enrolled in GED Prog.20 1/2 of students who pursued a GED had repeated at least one grade. Only 2 students who graduated in more than 4 years repeated at least one grade before their senior year. Graduated > 4 years14 Total345.8% Non-Graduates Cohort Subgroup # of Students% of Non Graduates% of Cohort Repeated Grade in District 8353.9%14.1% Did Not Repeat Grade in District 7146.1%12.1%

28 NLRSD Longitudinal Avg. ACT Performance

29 % of ACT-Tested Students for NLRSD in 2013 Ready for College-Level Coursework English Composition: 18 on ACT English Test Algebra: 22 on ACT Mathematics Test Social Science: 22 on ACT Reading Test Biology: 23 on ACT Science Test

30 NLRSD Longitudinal Adv. Placement Performance

31 NLRSD: Math/Science 2013 Adv. Placement Mean Score

32 NLRSD: Math/Science 2013 IB Mean Score

33 NLRSD: Arts 2013 Adv. Placement Mean Score

34 NLRSD: Liberal Arts 2013 Adv. Placement Mean Score

35 NLRSD: Liberal Arts 2013 IB Mean Score

36 Gifted and Talented Total of 1049 students K-12 are identified Various K-12 programs throughout the district One of only 5 IB schools in the state (Bentonville, Springdale, Hot Springs and Mt. Saint Mary) IB and CCSS are closely aligned – Globally recognized 95% of IB students graduate from college


Download ppt "Annual Report to the Public October Board Meeting 2013."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google