Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Social Psychology Unit 1-2 tests & dates Variety of activities Objective & outline for unit posted on website.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Social Psychology Unit 1-2 tests & dates Variety of activities Objective & outline for unit posted on website."— Presentation transcript:

1 Social Psychology Unit 1-2 tests & dates Variety of activities Objective & outline for unit posted on website

2 True or False 1.Most people would refuse to obey an authority figure who told them to hurt an innocent person. 2.Studies of college & professional athletic events indicate that home teams win about 6 in 10 games. 3.Individuals pull harder in a team tug-of-war than when they pull in a one-on-one tug-of- war.

3 Questions 1.Does his absenteeism signify illness, laziness, a stressful work atmosphere? 2.Was the horror of 9/11 the work of crazed evil people or ordinary people corrupted by life events. 3.What drives people to do good or evil?

4 Social Psychology Unit Social Thinking Social thinking involves thinking about others, especially when they engage in doing things that are unexpected.

5 Social Thinking  Social Psychology  scientific study of how we think about, influence, and relate to one another

6 Social Thinking  Attribution Theory: Fritz Heider (1958) suggested that we have a tendency to give causal explanations for someone ’ s behavior, often by crediting either the situation or the person ’ s disposition.

7 Social Thinking  Fundamental Attribution Error  tendency for observers, when analyzing another’s behavior, to underestimate the impact of the situation and to overestimate the impact of personal disposition  Examples: Fatal Attraction, 9/11, Nazi officials, ex.@ Williams college

8 Consequences to attribution  How we explain someone’s behavior affects how we react to it Negative behavior Situational attribution “Maybe that driver is ill.” Dispositional attribution “Crazy driver!” Tolerant reaction (proceed cautiously, allow driver a wide berth) Unfavorable reaction (speed up and race past the other driver, give a dirty look)

9 Social Thinking  Actor-observer bias Observer - when another person acts, our focus is on the person (disposition) Actor - When we act, however the environment commands our attention (situation)

10 Solutions Switch roles! If perspectives can be reversed, attributions also change.

11 Social Thinking  Attitude  belief and feeling that predisposes one to respond in a particular way to objects, people and events

12 Attitudes & Actions Cheating example p.5 TRM When we feel self-conscious, we are truer to our convictions

13 Do our attitudes guide our actions? Attitudes will guide actions if: –1. Outside influences are minimal –2. Attitude is relevant to behavior (running example) –3. Attitude that comes quickly to mind

14 Social Thinking  Our behavior is affected by our inner attitudes as well as by external social influences Internal attitudes External influences Behavior

15 Social Thinking  Attitudes follow behavior  Cooperative actions feed mutual liking

16 Do our actions affect our attitude? People come to believe what they stand up for Attitudes follow behavior

17 Demo M53 1 = strongly disagree 5 = strongly agree 1.World hunger is a serious problem that needs attention 2.Our country needs to address the growing # of homeless

18 1 = strongly disagree 5 = strongly agree 3.The right to vote is one of the most valuable right of American citizens 4.Our government should spend less $ on nuclear weapons and more on helping citizens better their lives

19 Demo M53 continued 1.Do you do anything to personally to lessen world hunger? 2.Do you personally do anything to help the homeless? 3.Did you vote in the last election if you were eligible? 4.Do you personally convey your feelings to the government?

20 Social Thinking  Cognitive Dissonance Theory  we act to reduce the discomfort (dissonance) we feel when two of our thoughts (cognitions) are inconsistent  Leon Festinger

21 Social Thinking  Cognitive dissonance

22 Situation You have volunteered to participate in a psychology experiment on campus. Upon arrival, you were seated at a table and asked to undertake a series of dull, meaning less tasks for about an hour. Afterward, the experimenter convinced you to extol the virtues of the tasks you had performed by describing them to other potential participants as highly worthwhile, interesting, and educational. You are paid either $1 or $20 to do this. You are asked to privately rate your enjoyment of the tasks on a survey. After which amount do you believe your actual enjoyment rating of the tasks would be higher? TRM p.7

23 3 concepts that illustrate the influence of actions on attitudes 1. Foot-in-the-door - start with small requests and more to larger requests –Low balling ( car dealer technique) –Write it down –Can have both +/- effects –Ex. Of brainwashing with Korean war POWs

24 3 concepts that illustrate the influence of actions on attitudes 2. Role play (Zimbardo exp.) 3. Cognitive dissonance Others: not in text –Primacy effect - 1st impression bias –Reciprocity - given a small gift, you feel like you need to give back

25 Tom Sawyer assignment Properly label assignment on piece of paper: Title, Name, Site, Hour Use complete sentences. Clearly explain how Ben experiences cognitive dissonance. Clearly explain how Tom uses foot-in-the- door. Be specific and include examples from the story to explain your answer.

26 Social Thinking  Cognitive Dissonance Theory  we act to reduce the discomfort (dissonance) we feel when two of our thoughts (cognitions) are inconsistent  Leon Festinger

27 Social Thinking  Foot-in-the-Door Phenomenon  tendency for people who have first agreed to a small request to comply later with a larger request  Ex. Korean war pows, sales techniques  Low balling  Write-it-down technique

28 Social Thinking  Role - set of expectations about a social position  Role play influences actions & attitudes  Ex. Philip Zimbardo prison experiment  Role play  Power of the situation is stronger then the individual

29 Zimbardo’s prison experiment Focus of study was the consequences of prisons life 1971 Stanford University Phillip Zimbardo

30 Add on to the back of your Quiet Rage Guide Phillip Zimbardo did eventually end the experiment. Make a list of lessons learn from this experiment? What applications can be made from what was learned in this experiment or what relevance is there for an experiment like this one?

31 Zimbardo’s prison experiment Conclusions: –Role play - people took on their roles and the situation became real –Role play influences actions & attitudes –Power of the situation is stronger then the individual

32 3 concepts that illustrate the influence of actions on attitudes 1.Foot-in-the-door 2.Role play 3.Cognitive dissonance

33 Experiments & Names Leon Festinger - Cog. Dis Fritz Heider - Attrib. Philip Zimbardo - Prison exp., role play

34 Answer the following questions: 1.Psychologists who study how we think about and influence, & relate to one another are called ? 2.Most people tend to _____ the extent to which people’s actions are influenced by social situations because their attention is focused on the person. 3.#2 is referred to as the ____________ 4.Heider proposed what theory? 5.Give an example of the consequences of attributions


Download ppt "Social Psychology Unit 1-2 tests & dates Variety of activities Objective & outline for unit posted on website."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google