1. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Power System Impacts from Large Scale Deployment of EV -The MERGE project – João A. Peças Lopes (jpl@fe.up.pt)

2. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 2 How to evaluate grid impacts from the presence of EV? Steps to be performed: 1.Need to understand the behavior of EV drivers  Surveys 2. Impacts in Power System operation and planning: Steady state operation Dynamic behaviour Generation reserve needs 3.Definition of management solutions with implications on battery charging modes 4.Design of charging infrastructures Specific simulation tools capable to incorporate EV drivers behaviours and new management and control concepts.

3. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 EFFECT OF DUMB CHARGING SCENARIO ON PORTUGAL’S ELECTRICITY DEMAND AND DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS (10% EV) 3 CONTROLLED CHARGING IS REQUIRED

4. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011  Charging approaches:  Drivers´ behaviours: Dumb Charging - EV owners are free to charge their vehicles whenever they want; electricity price is constant along the day. Multiple Prices Tariff - EV owners are free to charge their vehicles whenever they want; electricity price is not constant along the day. Smart Charging - envisions an active management system, where there are two hierarchical control structures, one headed by an Aggregator and other by the DSO, that control EV charging according to Aggregator’s market negotiations or according to the grid’s needs. EV electricity cost Behaviours defined according to the findings of a survey made within the framework of the MERGE project Conceptual Framework for EV Integration Into Electric Power Systems Possible EV charging approaches and drivers’ behaviours 4

5. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 The MERGE control concept A two level hierarchical control approach needs to be adopted: Local control housed at the EV grid interface, responding locally to grid frequency changes and voltage drops; Upper control level designed to deal with: “short-term programmed” charging to deal with branch congestion, voltage drops – performed at the aggregation level and involving a dialog with the DSO Delivery of reserves (secondary frequency control); Adjustments in charging according to the availability of power resources (renewable sources). 5 Adoption of an AC charging mode 3, using the control pilot connection

6. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Conceptual Framework For EV Integration EV must be an active element within the power system The Upper Level control requires interactions with: An Aggregating entity to allow:  Controlled charging  Reserve management  Market negotiation  DSO 6

7. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 EV Voltage / Frequency support modes Voltage Control Frequency Control Local Control Primary Control (local control) Secondary Control Coordinated Control 7 Active rectifiers or should be adopted to interface EV with the grid. Communication infrastructure Local control to be implemeted in a similar way to SAE 1772

8. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011  Data and assumptions:  Peak load – 25.1 kW  Annual energy consumption – 111 MWh  Vehicles in the network – 30  30% of the fleet of vehicles are electric  Period of lower energy price for Multiple Tariff Policy adherents – 23h to 6h Single line diagram of the LV test network  Results:  Power demand: Evaluation of EV Impacts in Distribution Networks – 1 Case study: typical Portuguese LV grid (residential area) Impossible approaches 8

9. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011  Voltage profiles for the peak hour:  Results:  Branches’ loading for the peak hour:  Weekly losses: No EV Dumb Charging Dual Tariff Policy Smart Charging Evaluation of EV Impacts in Distribution Networks – 2 Case study: typical Portuguese LV grid (residential area) 9

10. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Evaluation of EV Impacts in Distribution Networks Case study: typical Portuguese MV grid

11. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Evaluation of EV Impacts in Distribution Networks – Case study: typical Portuguese MV grid Load increases after first and final day travels Valley hour filling

12. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 12 No EV Dumb Charging Dual Tariff Policy Smart Charging Evaluation of EV Impacts in Distribution Networks – Case study: typical Portuguese MV grid

13. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Droop Control for EV Aggregators AGC Model with EV Control loop for EVs active power set-point PRIMARY FREQUENCY CONTROLSECONDARY FREQUENCY CONTROL Reserve Provision with EV Local Droop Control and Automatic Generation Control (AGC) 13

14. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Simplified Portuguese Transmission Network Droop Control for EV Control loop for EVs active power set-point PRIMARY FREQUENCY CONTROL SECONDARY FREQUENCY CONTROL Reserve Provision with EV - Local Droop Control and Automatic Generation Control (AGC) 14

15. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Reserve Primary Reserve - Frequency Control with EV 15

16. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 Secondary Reserve - AGC Operation with EV 16

17. Frankfurt (Germany), 6-9 June 2011 CONCLUSIONS Electric Vehicles will play an important role in the development of the Smart Grid concepts since they are: High flexible load device Mobile storage device The presence of Electric Vehicles, if properly managed, can: provide several ancillary services; allow a larger integration of renewable power sources; increase system robustness of operation. If Smart Charging and other Distributed Intelligent solutions are adopted, the need to reinforce the existing electrical grid and generation infrastructures can be postponed. 17 http://www.ev-merge.eu/