1. “Tech” side of Integration

2. Device Selection

3. Laptops Pros Compatible with existing Apps We can manage them Keyboard Repair Deployment speed is manageable Flash and Java Multiple Manufacturers PARCC Management Cons Software Costs Can be Expensive to reach battery life Management Costs

4. iPads Pros Large App Selection Controlled App Store “Touch” Interface Battery Life Cons Need to purchase Keyboard Manageability is weak Repairs are hard Expensive Slow deployment No Flash and Java Limited Printing Single Provider Additional Cost for PARCC Management

5. Android Tablets Pros Cost “Touch” Interface Large App Selection Battery Life Flash Multiple Manufacturers Cons Need to purchase Keyboard Repairs are hard App Store can be “uncontrolled” Slow Deployment No Java Limited Printing Additional Cost for PARCC Management

6. Chromebooks Pros We can manage them Keyboard Repair Fast Deploy Decent App Selection Cost Battery Life Flash Multiple Manufacturers PARCC Management is Easy Cons No “Touch” Interface Needs to be online most of the time App Selection not as good as other devices No Java Limited Printing Policy (Pro?)

7. Windows RT (Tablet/Surface) Pros Controlled App Store “Touch” Interface Battery Life Multiple Manufacturers Cons Limited App Selection Future Unknown Cost Repairs are hard Additional Cost for PARCC Management

8. Comparison DevicesCostAppsManageabilit y Deployme nt BatteryTotal Rating of 1 to 5 with 1 being the best and 5 the worse Laptops5223315 iPads4144114 Android Tablets 2234112 Chromebooks131117 Windows Surface RT 3544218

9. PARCC Requirements Recommend SpecificationChromebook Chrome OS 19 or Newer 1GB of Memory Wireless Network 1024x768 resolution Keyboard Headphone Jack 100kbps of Bandwidth per Student Lock Down Testing Device

10. The Pilot, What Has Been Learned (Tech) Found flaw in the way Hewlett Packard (HP) handles large amount of clients via wireless network HP has upgraded half of our Access Points HP is in the process of upgrading our Wireless Controllers Recommend placement of Access Points from survey is not ideal We are installing another 70 Access Points across the District Moving some of our current Access Points from hallways to classrooms

11. Cost of going 1:1

12. Per Student Cost Chromebook = $249 Management = $30 Case = $15 Misc. Cost = $5 Total = $299

13. Chromebooks rollout at HPHS & DHS 2014-2015 = 1870 x 110% x $299 = $615,043 (Freshmen and Sophomores) 2015-2016 = 1045 x 110% x $299 = $343,850 (Freshmen) 2016-2017 = 998 x 110% x $299 = $328,302 (Freshmen) * 10% Spare Units

14. Computer Replacement Budget

15. Computer Replacement Budget with 1:1

16. Cost after Computer Replacement Contribution 2014-2015 = $615,043 - $200,000 = $415,043 2015-2016 = $343,850 - $200,000 = $143,850 2016-2017 = $328,302 - $200,000 = $128,302

17. Student Tech Fee A yearly fee of $40 Would only be assessed to grade level that have Chromebooks Students would be able to keep Chromebooks at the end of High School

18. Cost Breakdown per Device 4 Year Cycle

19. Cost after Computer Replacement Contribution and Student Fee School Year = 113 Cost – Student Fee + FRAM = Total 2014-2015 = $415,043 - $74,800 + $7,240* = $347,483 2015-2016 = $143,850 - $116,600 + $10,860* = $38,110 2016-2017 = $128,003 - $156,520 + $14,480* = ($13,738) * District Cost for FRAM

20. 1:1 Logistics Students would own Chromebooks Schools would keep a supply (10%) of Chromebooks to handle forgotten/didn’t charge/under repair District would recommend 3 rd Party Insurance to cover repairs Students who leave early can either return Chromebook or pay out a depreciated price

21. Questions? Thank you!