Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Case Studies: Electronic Laboratory Notebooks Keith T Taylor & Phil McHale MDL Information Systems Inc.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Case Studies: Electronic Laboratory Notebooks Keith T Taylor & Phil McHale MDL Information Systems Inc."— Presentation transcript:

1 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Case Studies: Electronic Laboratory Notebooks Keith T Taylor & Phil McHale MDL Information Systems Inc

2 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Paper Notebook Legacy… …Scientists Perspective  For  Familiar  Portable  Enter data in free form  Mix text and graphics, scraps of paper (TLC)  Change data easily and see the corrections  Sign and date experiments  Notebook ownership  Against  Redundancy Notebook, Personal Software, Project Software, Instrumentation, Corporate Systems  Poor Interface to machine data  No access to other notebooks across the company  Slow publication of results from other project members or teams  Data abstraction in corporate databases may lose scientific context

3 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 ELN Advantages: Investigator  Automated data capture, calculations, analysis  Error checking/validations  Automated reporting  Less redundancy  Better fit in today’s workflow

4 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 ELN Advantages: Project Teams  Faster publication of results  Faster project-level feedback loops

5 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 ELN Advantages: Corporate  Searchable across organization  Faster reporting  Reduced costs of archival  Front-line error checking/validations  Better and faster backup and recovery procedures  More difficult to alter corporate records

6 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Discovery Informatics Framework Scientific Workflow Experiment Design Test Evaluate Synthesize Document Electronic Some Automation Mostly Manual Mostly Automated

7 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Scientific Methods & Datatypes  Automated Methods  Shift to electronic support mechanism  Increase in data volumes (data in/data out)  Interfacing to instrumentation  Interfacing to robots  Scientific Datatypes

8 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Introduction to MDL  Scientific discovery informatics software  Chemistry  Life Sciences  Scientific Databases  Synthetic Chemistry  Drug Databases  Reagent Databases  Metabolism & Toxicology Databases  Environmental Safety Databases  Scientific Information Support Services  An Elsevier Science Company

9 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 MDL’s role in ELN’s  Technology Framework Provider  Integration and Collaborative Computing Tools  Scientist, Project, Corporate  Primary contractor in building Electronic Laboratory Notebooks  Interface to the Investigator…..Collecting the “What” & “How”  Integration of technologies “What, “How”, “Who”, “When”, “Where”  Five year history providing ELN’s for data capture/sharing …now maturing into paperless ELN’s

10 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Evolution of MDL ELNs  Personal Chemistry ELN  Database-centric data collection notebooks  Front-end to corporate database  Electronic form to paper form  Paper signing and archival  Rigid user interface  Rigid Workflow Database Centric ELN

11 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Evolution of MDL ELNs  Groupware Chemistry/Biology ELN  Document-centric with database capabilities  Familiar user interface  Flexible user interface  Flexible workflow  Data push capability  Paper signing and archival  Project oriented for collaborative computing  Electronic document to paper document Groupware ELN

12 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Evolution of MDL ELNs  Paperless Web-based ELN  Database-Centric data collection application  Electronic Form to Electronic Document  Electronic Document Sign, Witness, Authenticate  Electronic Document Archival Data/Document Centric ELN

13 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Sign, Witness, Authenticate Time MDL Sign&Certify Component

14 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 The Electronic Record

15 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Step 1 : Experiment / Document Data Sealed Document Archive Step 4 : Document Retrieval/Certify Authenticity SignedDocument Step 2 : Witness Queue WitnessedDocument Step 3 : Time-stamped, Authenticate, Archive AuthenticateDocumentArchivedDocument

16 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Élan ™ : Electronic Laboratory Notebook System  Developed by a chemist  Dr. Stefan Abrecht of Roche  Familiar document interface  Microsoft Word  ISIS/Draw  Flexible user interface  Flexible workflow  Ability to embed images almost anywhere on page  Automatic calculation of derived data  Automatic, central archiving

17 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Élan ™ : Electronic Laboratory Notebook System Draw reaction M.Wt. & formula calculated Enter quantities and description Enter amount isolated and description Yields etc calculated

18 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 ELN Benefits  Scientists like them  Mining the “notebooks”  Electronic notebook is virtually indestructible  Reduces data sifting in notebooks by weeks  Facilitates business portfolio management  Collapse data recording to one event for the investigator  Faster publication to corporate database  Evolving with current technology for rapid adoption of new technologies

19 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Technologies Used in MDL’s ELNs  Horizontal technologies  Surety  PenOp plug-in to Adobe Exchange  Microsoft Word  Lotus Notes  Adobe Distiller and Exchange  Oracle  MDL technologies  Isis/Draw, ISIS/Base, ISIS/PL, ISIS/Host, ISIS/Object Library  MDL sign&certify component  Software additions?  Chemscape/Chime Pro…web access to data and notebook records  Assay Explorer…life sciences electronic laboratory notebook  Spectral viewers

20 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 MDL’s Directions  New MDL scientific object platform  An architecture that allows MDL and non-MDL products to work together  An Electronic Lab Notebook suite of products

21 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Challenges  Scientists Workflow  Data types  Automation & Instrumentation  Compliance  Voice recognition  Addressing Hierarchy of Needs  Scientist -> Project Team -> Corporate  Records management  Security  Audit trail  IP issues, authentication

22 ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 A General ELN?  Will a general lab notebook emerge?  Common data repositories  Common records management  Different user interface requirements Synthetic methods chemistry parallel synthesis chemistry Biologists (and medicinal chemists) Analytical science


Download ppt "ACS San Francisco, Spring 2000 Case Studies: Electronic Laboratory Notebooks Keith T Taylor & Phil McHale MDL Information Systems Inc."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google