1. Are You Ready for an Open Source LMS? Is It Ready for You? Steven Hancock

2. OpenSource LMS <> Moodle

3. Topics 1.Open Source License 2.The State of Open Source LMSes 3.Criteria 4.Short List 5.LMSes from Steve’s Perspective

4. Open Source License 1.Free Redistribution 2.Source code must be included 3.Derived Works 4.Integrity of authors source code 5.No discriminations of people or groups 6.No discrimination against fields of endeavor 7.Distribution of license 8.License must be specific to a product 9.License must not restrict other software 10.License must be technology neutral http://opensource.org/docs/osd

5. Is OpenSource Free?

6. If I Choose OpenSource will I have to go it Alone?

7. If I Choose OpenSource what am I Sacrificing?

8. What has changed in 5 years?  Many more LMSes (3-4 times)  SCORM Support  Collaboration Features

9. The State of Open Source LMSes  Positives  Many to choose from that are well funded.  Support seems robust in most cases  Third-party Services are readily available.  Assessment engines  Negatives  SCORM seems to be a secondary concern.  Too many try to be a web portal  Content Creation Tools

10. Epic  www.epic.co.uk www.epic.co.uk  Open Source Learning Management Systems by Mark Aberdour

11. Epic’s Shortlisted Criteria:  An approved Open Source license  Active Development Community  Released Stable Versions  English  SCORM Compliant  Published Details about Previous Adopters  Stable Organizations Supporting Development  Published Third Party Reviews

12. The Shortlist  ATutor http://www.atutor.ca/http://www.atutor.ca/  Claroline http://www.claroline.net/http://www.claroline.net/  Docebo http://www.docebo.org/http://www.docebo.org/  Dokeos http://www.dokeos.com/http://www.dokeos.com/  dotLRN http://dotlrn.openacs.org/http://dotlrn.openacs.org/  Ilias http://www.ilias.de/http://www.ilias.de/  Interact http://www.interactole.org/http://www.interactole.org/  KEWL.NextGen http://kngforge.uwc.ac.za/http://kngforge.uwc.ac.za/  Metacoon http://www.metacoon.de/http://www.metacoon.de/  Moodle http://moodle.org/http://moodle.org/  OLAT http://www.olat.org/http://www.olat.org/  OpenElms http://www.openelms.org/http://www.openelms.org/  Sakai http://www.sakaiproject.org/http://www.sakaiproject.org/

13. The Even Shorter List  ATutor  dotLRN  Ilias  Moodle  Sakai

14. How to Determine Which LMS to Choose?  Make a List of Criteria - Research  Try Out the Demos  Research the System Requirements  Research the Features  Install and Make Sure you can Support IT.

15. LMS Interface Example

16. Content Authoring Example

17. Assessments

18. Features of all LMSes  Services  Support  Add-ons  Standard features: content authoring, assessment, enrollment, collaboration, rebrandable

19. aTutor  Standards Heavy  Supported by 16 organizations  Vote on new features  Documentation is average  Not difficult to install

20. DotLRN  Originally developed at MIT  Heavily used in education and government  Managed by a non-profit organization and supported by 16 consortium members  Difficult to install: “Please note that the production version requires considerable expertise (Unix/Linux sys admin) to install.”  SCORM seems like an after thought.

21. Ilias  Developed in Germany  Install doesn’t look too bad  Documentation is very mediocre  Only LMS I found that was ADL Certified

22. Moodle  Numerous large installations  Books written on Moodle  Installation does not seem too difficult

23. Sakai  Has the vested interest of large organizations: IBM, Sun, Unisys, University of Michigan, Indiana University, and MIT  Over 100 Sakai partners  Community Source project (-)  Single click installer

24. Other Stand Outs  Claroline  Docebo  Dokeos  OpenElms

25. ?