Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

HOW’S THE DATA? COLORADO GEAR UP FALL RETREAT, AUG 14-15, 2013 Prepared by Ryan Allred.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "HOW’S THE DATA? COLORADO GEAR UP FALL RETREAT, AUG 14-15, 2013 Prepared by Ryan Allred."— Presentation transcript:

1 HOW’S THE DATA? COLORADO GEAR UP FALL RETREAT, AUG 14-15, 2013 Prepared by Ryan Allred

2 Agenda  Data Summary  College Portfolio, Portfolios  Security  Research, Consortium

3

4 Research  GU2 (2005-2011)  First Graduating Cohort in May 2011  87 % - On-Time Graduation (of Active 9 th -12 th )  72 % Statewide Rate  84 % - College Going Rate (of HS Graduates)  58% Statewide Rate  81 % - Year 1 College Persistence  69 % - On Track To Graduate  44 % Statewide Rate Source: Colorado GEAR UP - Improving Academic Achievement: A Report on Colorado GEAR UP II At-Risk Student Outcomes, August 2012

5 Projection for 2013-14 and 2014-15 (May 2013) Grades 8-12 Only Grades 9-12 Only Grade 8 Only Grade 8-9 2013-14 assumes 95% retention of existing students plus recruiting class from spring 2013 2014-15 assumes 95% retention of 2013-14 students plus recruiting class similar to spring 2013

6 Actual for 2013-14 and Projection for 2014-15 Grades 8-12 Only Grades 9-12 Only Grade 8 Only Grade 8-9 2014-15 assumes 95% retention of 2013-14 students plus recruiting class similar to spring 2013 +4%

7 Student Attrition from August to May 2012-13, Enrollment as of 5/13/2013

8 Student Surveys

9 Parent Surveys

10 Services

11 2012-13 Service Count by Category

12 College Portfolio & Portfolios

13 College Portfolio Examples Online Survey

14 College Portfolio Examples Specific Curriculum

15 Portfolios: Where do I find this stuff?  GU School View Page  www.coloradogearup.org/public/schoolview/  Demographics, CSAP, Remediation, College Matric  Research Data Briefs  Resource Corner, GU Database  Remedial, Retention, HS Grad Rates, College Matric  DHE & CDE  http://highered.colorado.gov/i3/default.aspx  http://www.cde.state.co.us/dataandaccountability

16 Personal Information, Passwords, Protection Security

17 Protect Your Passwords  Protect All Passwords  Free Software to store passwords  Examples  PassKeeper http://passkeeper.com/  Password Safe http://passwordsafe.sourceforge.net/

18 PII - Personally Identifiable Information  Defined  Refers to “information that can be used to distinguish or trace an individual’s identity  Any unique student identifier, once linked to a student record, this identifier becomes part of that student’s PII First Name, Last Name Social Security Number SASID LASID

19 Pop Quiz Hot Shot: PII – Yes or No? SASID First NameLast NameCollege NameDate Paid Amount PaidTerm 411785022MeghanCave COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY2/7/2013 $1,250Spring 436870179ScottMendelsberg COMMUNITY COLLEGE OF DENVER9/27/2012 $1,250Fall 461955336RyanAllredADAMS STATE COLLEGE9/12/2012 $1,250Fall 487040493ChristinaIngrumREGIS UNIVERSITY2/16/2012 $1,250Spring 512125650TimpiWebberADAMS STATE COLLEGE10/23/2012 $1,250Fall 537210807NancyMitchell UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO2/14/2012 $1,250Spring 587381121JoeGarcia COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY - PUEBLO2/14/2011 $1,250Spring

20 Basic Protection  Using Security in Excel  Built in Password Protection

21 Next Level Protection  Encryption, Self-Extracting Encrypted Files  Like “ZIP” files, but with special encoding  Free or low cost products  SecureZip (Encrypted Zip Files, for storage & e-mail) www.pkware.com  Other options found at www.cnet.com

22 Research Data Briefs Consortium Research Update

23 Research Data Briefs  Internal Research  General Questions  Concurrent/AP  Retention  Remedial  Enrollment  Financial Aid  Early College

24 Consortium  2011 high school graduate data  Entire Colorado Population, 2011-12  Consortium  Researchers from universities: University of Colorado Boulder University of Michigan Stanford & Harvard Universities Vanderbilt University

25 Early Results  University of Michigan  Analysis Group (267 GU Students & Matched Peers)  62% more likely of pursuing concurrent credits  40% higher college enrollment rates  Stanford / Harvard  Influence of participation in concurrent enrollment  32% higher college enrollment rates (fall after hs)  10% more likely to enroll in a 2-year college  22% more likely to enroll in a 4-year college

26 Early Results  University of Colorado Boulder  Chad Nash  Assistant Director of Assessment & Evaluation, ASSETT  “Outcomes of Concurrent Enrollment on 2011 Graduates”

27 Please login again to access your data! Session Expired


Download ppt "HOW’S THE DATA? COLORADO GEAR UP FALL RETREAT, AUG 14-15, 2013 Prepared by Ryan Allred."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google