1. Open Archives for Library and Information Science: an international experience Antonella de Robbio and Paula Sequeiros IV EBIB Conference: Open Access - Internet in libraries 7th December 2007 Torun, Poland 7th December 2007

2. 2 underlying concepts Open Access (OA) as the motivation

3. 3 underlying concepts Open Access (OA) as the motivation global effort to redefine the mechanisms of scholarly communication to make LIS research more visible and accessible

4. 4 underlying concepts Open Access (OA) as the motivation global effort to redefine the mechanisms of scholarly communication to make LIS research more visible and accessible Trend towards digital libraries and self- archiving

5. 5 E-LIS e-prints in Library and Information Science http://eprints.rclis.org

6. 6 E-LIS established in 2003

7. 7 E-LIS established in 2003 GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant

8. 8 E-LIS established in 2003 GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant first international Open Archive for Library and Information Science

9. 9 E-LIS established in 2003 GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant first international Open Archive for Library and Information Science a part of the RCLIS project

10. 10 E-LIS established in 2003 GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant first international Open Archive for Library and Information Science a part of the RCLIS project international team of voluntary librarians

11. 11 E-LIS established in 2003 GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant first international Open Archive for Library and Information Science a part of the RCLIS project international team of voluntary librarians not-for-profit project

12. 12 E-LIS established in 2003 GNU ePrints software, OAI/PMH compliant first international Open Archive for Library and Information Science a part of the RCLIS project international team of voluntary librarians not-for-profit project freely accessible to users (search and full-text)

13. 13 the archive: documents preprints (6%) postprints (35%) unpublished (59%)

14. 14 the archive: documents articles (25%) 200 journals papers (9%) 250 conferences unpublished (59%) other (7%)

15. 15 the archive: documents reviewed (62%)

16. 16 growth of records in archive (Oct. 2007)

17. 17 growth of records in archive (Oct. 2007)

18. 18 what goes in and how LIS topics and interrelated disciplines, scientific or technical

19. 19 what goes in and how LIS topics and interrelated disciplines, scientific or technical finished documents, published or unpublished, any language or format

20. 20 what goes in and how LIS topics and interrelated disciplines, scientific or technical finished documents, published or unpublished, any language or format authors self-archive

21. 21 what goes in and how LIS topics and interrelated disciplines, scientific or technical finished documents, published or unpublished, any language or format authors self-archive and agreements with institutions and library associations

22. 22 submissions and authors 60% of submissions mediated by E-LIS editors 30% self-archived 2540 authors

23. 23

24. 24

25. 25

26. 26 value-added tools for editors and for users automatic alerts for editors

27. 27 value-added tools for editors and for users automatic alerts for editors full metadata display

28. 28 value-added tools for editors and for users automatic alerts for editors full metadata display full-text search

29. 29 value-added tools for editors and for users automatic alerts for editors full metadata display full-text search counter in homepage

30. 30 value-added tools for editors and for users automatic alerts for editors full metadata display full-text search counter in homepage statistics from Webalizer

31. 31 value-added tools for editors and for users reference linking with ParaTools

32. 32

33. 33 organisational model: E-LIS teams initiative's strategic issues

34. 34 organisational model: E-LIS teams initiative's strategic issues future direction

35. 35 organisational model: E-LIS teams initiative's strategic issues future direction policies and impact on the user community

36. 36 organisational model: E-LIS teams initiative's strategic issues future direction policies and impact on the user community connection with other scientific communities

37. 37 organisational model: E-LIS administration archive’s international and future vision

38. 38 organisational model: E-LIS administration archive’s international and future vision understanding of national and international needs

39. 39 organisational model: E-LIS administration archive’s international and future vision understanding of national and international needs world framework of Open Access strategic issues

40. 40 international & local 5 continents

41. 41 international & local 5 continents 42 countries

42. 42 international & local 5 continents 42 countries common vision

43. 43 international & local 5 continents 42 countries common vision & cultural individuality

44. 44 international context similar initiatives (LIS domain) E-LIS

45. 45 international context similar initiatives (LIS domain) E-LIS clearly international

46. 46 international context similar initiatives (LIS domain) E-LIS clearly international not commercially-driven (no external funding; no profit)

47. 47 international context similar initiatives (LIS domain) E-LIS clearly international not commercially-driven (no external funding; no profit) based on voluntary work

48. 48 E-LIS policies policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff

49. 49 E-LIS policies policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved

50. 50 E-LIS policies policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved submission policies: who can deposit and how

51. 51 E-LIS policies policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved submission policies: who can deposit and how metadata quality

52. 52 E-LIS policies policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved submission policies: who can deposit and how metadata quality copyright policies

53. 53 E-LIS policies policy concerns are discussed and democratically agreed upon by the editorial staff mission, aims and objectives; target audience and communities involved submission policies: who can deposit and how metadata quality copyright policies organisational model

54. 54 copyright policies RoMEO Project recommendations concerning the self-archiving of documents Know your rights!Know your rights! of Project RomeoProject Romeo www.lboro.ac.uk/departments/ls/disresear ch/romeo/Know-your-rights.doc

55. 55 copyright policies author retains property after deposit authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission) refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self- archiving failing that, can append a link to published paper

56. 56 copyright policies author retains property after deposit authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission) refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self- archiving failing that, can append a link to published paper

57. 57 copyright policies author retains property after deposit authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission) refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self- archiving failing that, can append a link to published paper

58. 58 copyright policies author retains property after deposit authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission) refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self- archiving failing that, can append a link to published paper

59. 59 copyright policies author retains property after deposit authors responsible for ensuring that documents have no restrictions on electronic distribution pre-refereed preprints - author holds copyright (no need for permission) refereed postprints, author can try to modify the copyright transfer agreement to allow self- archiving failing that, can link to published paper

60. 60 organisational model over 60 editors – sharing a common vision – contributing to E-LIS with their own experience and competence

61. 61 organisational model over 60 editors – sharing a common vision – contributing to E-LIS with their own experience and competence administration team

62. 62 national metadata undergoing debate - launching of a service provider to harvest and gather national metadata from national LIS archives which could become a part of the RCLIS infrastructure

63. 63 E-LIS policies preservation issues preservation metadata - designed for identifying and managing digital content over a long period of time

64. 64 preservation JISC Circular 4/04, note 10 no «formal preservation policy» was being followed «de facto rules on file formats and transformations but no provision for acquiring the source versions» «strategy for preservation should be determined by the nature and need of the repository, and should be driven by repository policy rather than the other way around»

65. 65 preservation JISC Circular 4/04, note 10 no «formal preservation policy» was being followed «de facto rules on file formats and transformations but no provision for acquiring the source versions» «strategy for preservation should be determined by the nature and need of the repository, and should be driven by repository policy rather than the other way around»

66. 66 preservation JISC Circular 4/04, note 10 no «formal preservation policy» was being followed «de facto rules on file formats and transformations but no provision for acquiring the source versions» «strategy for preservation should be determined by the nature and need of the repository, and should be driven by repository policy rather than the other way around»

67. 67 preservation PRESERV (PReservation Eprint SERVices) a JISC project researching and developing infrastructural digital preservation services for institutional repositories

68. 68 preservation PRESERV (PReservation Eprint SERVices) a JISC project researching and developing infrastructural digital preservation services for institutional repositories offering a tool integrated into ROAR (Registry of Open Access Repositories http://roar.eprints.org/http://roar.eprints.org/

69. 69 preservation PRESERV (PReservation Eprint SERVices) a JISC project researching and developing infrastructural digital preservation services for institutional repositories offering a tool integrated into ROAR (Registry of Open Access Repositories http://roar.eprints.org/http://roar.eprints.org/ E-LIS responded to survey and «is working to allow for a Preserv profile within ROAR

70. 70 preservation PRONOM-DROID The National Archives - database of file formats, PRONOM, to identify repositories content using DROID (Digital Record Object Identification) open source software PRONOMDigital Record Object Identification) file format identification service applied to data collected by the Celestial harvester graphical view of a repository is broken down by file formats through ROAR’s user interface

71. 71 preservation PRONOM-DROID The National Archives - database of file formats, PRONOM, to identify repositories content using DROID (Digital Record Object Identification) open source software PRONOMDigital Record Object Identification) file format identification service applied to data collected by the Celestial harvester graphical view of a repository is broken down by file formats through ROAR’s user interface

72. 72 preservation OpenDOAR (The Directory of Open Access Repositories http://www.opendoar.org/

73. 73 preservation OpenDOAR (The Directory of Open Access Repositories http://www.opendoar.org/ tool that supports preservation policy

74. 74 preservation OpenDOAR (The Directory of Open Access Repositories http://www.opendoar.org/ tool that supports preservation policy preservation policy definition form allows for external partnerships

75. 75 preservation GNU EPrints v.3 (Jan. 2007), supports the preservation of digital objects

76. 76 preservation GNU EPrints v.3 (Jan. 2007), supports the preservation of digital objects records the history of changes to a document

77. 77 preservation GNU EPrints v.3 (Jan. 2007), supports the preservation of digital objects records the history of changes to a document preserves rights declarations

78. 78 preservation E-LIS (Morrisson et al., 2007) (then a) total of 5077 records

79. 79 preservation E-LIS (Morrisson et al., 2007) (then a) total of 5077 records 86% were found to be PDF/MS-Word

80. 80 preservation August 2007, E-LIS project DRAMBORA (Digital Repository Audit Method Based on Risk Assessment)

81. 81 preservation purpose of the DRAMBORA toolkit […] identifying the risks and vulnerabilities associated with the mandate, activities and assets assessing and calculating the risks defining risk management measures […]

82. 82 preservation results of auditing: E-LIS needs to improve at technical management level, while at content level it showed to be well-prepared

83. 83 conclusions 1. LIS computing science and technology - bibliometric and citation analysis an interesting reference case to other communities

84. 84 conclusions 2.diversification of nationalities and languages – 82 countries – 36 languages

85. 85 conclusions 2.diversification of nationalities and languages intensive collaboration from Polish librarians:

86. 86 conclusions 2.diversification of nationalities and languages intensive collaboration from Polish librarians: – quality papers in E-LIS

87. 87 conclusions 2.diversification of nationalities and languages intensive collaboration from Polish librarians: – quality papers in E-LIS – very high bibliometric skills

88. 88 conclusions 2.diversification of nationalities and languages intensive collaboration from Polish librarians: – quality papers in E-LIS – very high bibliometric skills – excellent editors Bozena Bednarek- Michalska and Lidia Derfert-WolfBozena Bednarek- MichalskaLidia Derfert-Wolf

89. 89 conclusions 3.international LIS network stimulated by –extension of OA concept to LIS

90. 90 conclusions 3.international LIS network stimulated by –extension of OA concept to LIS facilitated by –dissemination of material within the community

91. 91 conclusions 4.E-LIS contributing to outline global vision of LIS domain challenges and opportunities motivation to engage in such a venture and to further develop international research activities

92. 92 conclusions 4.E-LIS contributing to outline global vision of LIS domain challenges and opportunities motivation to engage in such a venture and to further develop international research activities

93. 93 conclusions 4.E-LIS contributing to outline global vision of LIS domain challenges and opportunities motivation to engage and to further develop international research activities