1. Bryan Sonnier – Project ManagerJulian Coleman – Software Engineer Jonathan Tindall – Hardware EngineerTam Bui – Test Engineer TEAM MEMBERS:

2. Bryan Sonnier – Project Manager Jonathan Tindall – Hardware Engineer Julian Coleman – Software Engineer Tam Bui – Test Engineer Project Advisor – Dr. Wei Zhan Project Sponsor – OI Analytical 2 & SAM Unit Redesign and Integration Project SAMURAI:

3.  CO 2 concentration increases due to:  Poorly ventilated areas  Combustion of fossil fuels  Human respiration  Exposure to elevated levels can lead to hypercapnia, resulting in possible death 3 CO 2 (ppm)Warning LevelSide Effects 300-400None 10,000LowSlight drowsiness, headache 20,000MediumChest heaviness, more frequent and deeper respirations 30,000HighBreathing rate doubles, heart rate increases, risk acidosis 50,000CriticalSensory dysfunction, unconsciousness, death http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ File:Carbon-dioxide-3D- vdW.svg Information from http://www.inspect-ny.com/hazmat/CO2gashaz.htm

4.  SAM filters can detect various gases including CO 2 and refrigerants  Detects leaks sooner and at lower levels to avoid air quality fines  Section 609 of EPA’s Clean Air Act allows for fines of $32,500 per day!  OSHA Indoor Air Quality Standards  Wide range of industrial and commercial applications 4 http://www.oico.com

5.  Fully integrate Windows CE environment  Develop remote configuration application  Create peripheral interface board  Develop standalone remote monitor with LCD  Design power inverter for pump 5 SAMURAI: SAM Unit Redesign and Integration

6.  Final product has the potential to save lives  Opportunity to give new face to product line  Installation cost is currently too high for some customers  Reduce operating costs by eliminating avoidable fines 6

7. Problem Statement Functional Requirements Conceptual Block Diagram Functional Block Diagram 7

8. “How can Dynamic Design revitalize OI Analytical’s SAM Unit product line by adding features and functionality while reducing cost to the customer?” 8

9. 9  Power Inverter Board - Convert 24V DC to 115V AC  Peripheral Interface - Provide multiple RS-485 connections - Provide 24V DC connector to the internal unit  CE Board - Control Modbus slaves - Provide GUI interface - Monitor CO2 levels - Activate alarms corresponding to PPM levels

10. 10  Expansion Module - Provide up to 8 gas sample channels - Monitor temperature around sample area  Remote Monitor - Display channel and PPM levels - View Sam Unit settings

11. 11 WWW Remote Application Ethernet 10 PPM Remote Monitor RS-485 SAM MODBUS Zero Intake Inverter Main Board Gas Sensor 24V DC Gas Pump Windows CE Interface 10 PPM Alarm Interface Board New Boards Old Boards Carbon Dioxide Source Gas Valves Microprocessor Expansion Unit RS-485

12. … 12

13. Expansion Module 13

14. 14

15. 15

16. 16

17. 17

18. 18

19. 19

20. 20

21. 1. Approval of completed test plan 2. Approval of initial hardware designs 3. Acceptance of final hardware designs 4. Acceptance of remote monitor application 5. Acceptance of Windows CE application 6. Acceptance of the expansion module application 7. Acceptance of the final test results 8. Acceptance of completed user manual 9. Acceptance of fully functional working prototype 21

22.  Hardware 1. Schematics with Revisions 2. PCB layout 3. Bill of Materials 4. PCB boards  Software 5. GUI Mockup 6. Hierarchy Chart 7. Flow Chart 8. Documented Source Code 22

23. 23  System 9. Weekly TAT Meetings (not represented on timeline) 10. Test Plan 11. Critical Design Review 12. Test Report 13. Final Presentation and Demonstration 14. User Manual 15. Fully Functional and Working Prototype 16. Final Project Report

24. 24

25. 25

26.  Testing Experience  Two years of experience as a Dell representative diagnosing and testing damaged laptops  Three years using various testing equipment  Involved in frequent testing of small components and printed circuit boards  Technical Qualifications  Previous experience with RS-485 and Modbus communication  Experience with the designing process and layout of a PCB 26

27.  Hardware Experience  Circuit design using Multisim and PSpice  PCB design using Ultiboard  Two years experience in hardware troubleshooting  Software Experience  Has experience with C,C++, and assembly languages 27

28.  Technical Qualifications  Extensive knowledge in C, C++, Java, PHP and assembly as well as other programming languages  A+ Certified Computer Technician  Engineering Experience  Experienced with the Microchip PIC24 microcontroller and Freescale MPC 555  Designed temperature monitor with signal conditioning that utilized Modbus communications over RS-485 28

29.  Management Experience  Advertising manager for 4.0 & Go ▪ Responsible for advertising schedules for 12 employees ▪ Recommended solutions that increased profits over 30%  Account manager for AmeriCommerce ▪ Handled accounts for 20 online retailers ▪ Developed Web pages and graphic design  Technical Qualifications  Six years experience with various programming languages  Two years experience with PCB design 29

30. Technical Merit Factor Weight Project Contains: A clearly described and completely understood technical challenge 0.1 A requirement for system integration 0.2 A requirement for system testing 0.2 A requirement for analysis 0.2 Hardware design, development and test 0.3 Software design, development and test 0.3 A hardware fabrication requirement, typically a prototype 0.2 Preliminary Technical Merit Evaluation: 1.5 30

31. Technical Merit FactorWeight Project Contains: A clearly described and completely understood technical challenge 0.1  Windows CE environment  Remote Configuration Application  Must adapt to OI Analytical’s Modbus specifications Preliminary Technical Merit Evaluation: 0.1 31

32. Technical Merit FactorWeight Project Contains: A clearly described and completely understood technical challenge 0.1 A requirement for system integration 0.2  Transition system to Windows CE environment  Peripheral interface board  Expansion module board  Adapt to OI Analytical’s Modbus specifications Preliminary Technical Merit Evaluation: 0.3 32

33. Technical Merit FactorWeight Project Contains: A clearly described and completely understood technical challenge 0.1 A requirement for system integration 0.2 A requirement for system testing 0.2  Includes current test procedures Preliminary Technical Merit Evaluation: 0.5 33

34. Technical Merit FactorWeight Project Contains: A clearly described and completely understood technical challenge 0.1 A requirement for system integration 0.2 A requirement for system testing 0.2 A requirement for analysis 0.2  Characterize temperature sensor Preliminary Technical Merit Evaluation: 0.7 34

35. Technical Merit FactorWeight Project Contains: A clearly described and completely understood technical challenge 0.1 A requirement for system integration 0.2 A requirement for system testing 0.2 A requirement for analysis 0.2 Hardware design, development and test 0.3  Power inverter  Peripheral interface board  Expansion board  Remote Monitor Preliminary Technical Merit Evaluation: 1.0 35

36. Technical Merit FactorWeight Project Contains: A clearly described and completely understood technical challenge 0.1 A requirement for system integration 0.2 A requirement for system testing 0.2 A requirement for analysis 0.2 Hardware design, development and test 0.3 Software design, development and test 0.3  Windows CE environment  Remote configuration application  Remote monitoring display interface Preliminary Technical Merit Evaluation: 1.3 36

37. Technical Merit FactorWeight Project Contains: A clearly described and completely understood technical challenge 0.1 A requirement for system integration 0.2 A requirement for system testing 0.2 A requirement for analysis 0.2 Hardware design, development and test 0.3 Software design, development and test 0.3 A hardware fabrication requirement, typically a prototype 0.2  Modify expansion module enclosure to accommodate communication and power connectors  Remote monitor will need an enclosure Preliminary Technical Merit Evaluation: 1.5 37

38. Technical Merit FactorWeight Project Contains: A clearly described and completely understood technical challenge 0.1 A requirement for system integration 0.2 A requirement for system testing 0.2 A requirement for analysis 0.2 Hardware design, development and test 0.3 Software design, development and test 0.3 A hardware fabrication requirement, typically a prototype 0.2 A requirement for documentation other than the project report 0.2 A requirement for intellectual property protection 0.1 Preliminary Technical Merit Evaluation: 1.5 38

39.  Thank you for your time!  Questions? 39