1. May 3, 2011 – Federal Parliament Hans De Greve Advocacy Officer Plan Belgium Basic Education in Belgian Development Cooperation

2. © Plan What do we mean by ‘Basic Education’ Different definitions exist OECD-DAC and standard aid classifications use a definition that includes: early childhood education primary education basic life skills for youth and adults, including literacy.

3. © Plan Belgian Investment in Education Aid (1) Total ODA Total ODA (2009): 1.874 mil. Total Education ODA (2009): 194 mil. (10,35%) DGD ODA DGD ODA (2009): 1.252 mil. DGD Total Education ODA: 154 mil. (12.33%) Flanders Total ODA (2009): 49.5 mil. Total Education ODA (2009): 7,9 mil. (16%) French Community/Walloon Region Total ODA (2009): 23.5 mil. Total Education ODA (2007): 3.1 Mil. (13%)

4. © Plan Aid to Basic Education - Federal Government Unesco analysis only until 2008 but: Comparability Independent and objective Trends remain the same in 2009 and 2010 Education in general rising slightly Basic Education dropping since 2006 © Unesco EFA Global Monitoring Report

5. © Plan Aid to Basic Education - Federal Government (2) Traditional strong focus on Higher Education – 64% Imputed Student Cost – 16% Basic Education 18% but declining since 2004 Average donor share to basic education 41% Strong focus on LIC Pre-school 0.2% in 2008

6. © Plan Aid to Basic Education – Flemish Community No Unesco analysis for Regions – Most recent data Almost all Aid to Education comes from Departement of Education (vs. Development Cooperation) Aid to Basic Education stable around 39% (2.8 mil. in 2010) 2.3 mil./year attributed to 3 year Unicef project (2008- 2010) Rest of Education Aid mostly attributed to Higher Education Flanders Aid to Education

7. © Plan Aid to Basic Education – French Community No analysis of education aid possible for 2008/2009 2007 aid figures show: 24.3 mil. Total ODA 3.1 mil. Total Aid to Education (13%) 1.1 mil. Aid to ‘non–Higher Education Aid’ ± 1 mil. Of ‘Non-Higher Education Aid’ is contribution to APEFE

8. © Plan Federal Governement - Sector Evaluation 2005 In preparation of new education policy sector note Discrepancy between MDG policy discours and practice of low investment in Basic Education Hardly any investment in preschool education Limited multilateral investments and silent partnerships in education

9. © Plan Federal Government - Situation in 2011 After 6(!) years still no new education sector policy note Discrepancy MDG discours and practice remains Disbursement channels (DGD 2009):

10. © Plan Federal Government - Multilateral Multilateral investment stayed low until 2009 – since 2009 different way of reporting core-funding Primary Education predominantly through Fast Track Initiative Strong scaling up of FTI funding: 1 mil. in 2009 to 6 mil. in 2010. Pledges 2011? FTI should be additional funding Questions on effectiveness of FTI – Evaluation in 2010 FTI does not always reach countries ‘most in need’

11. © Plan Federal Governement – Bilateral Bilateral: new Indicative Development Cooperation Programmes (PIC/ISP) in 13 countries: Education remains priority sector in only 4 countries: Burundi, DR Congo, Palestine O.T., Uganda Phasing-out important basic education programme in Cambodja, … Bleak picture for strong programmes on basic education in Rwanda, Vietnam, … Bilateral Education Aid in 4 remaining countries predominantly TVET Primary education in: Burundi: Teacher training (primary and secondary and TVET) and sector budget support* Palestina O.T.: School Construction and Curriculum development NGO: mostly in ‘TVET’, followed by ‘life skills education’ Preschool: still hardly any investment

12. © Plan What about quality of basic education? Quality focus is in discours – but difficult to say without sector note Low investment = low investment in quality Belgium has a track record of working on quality basic education (Cambodja, Vietnam, DR Congo, etc) – But what about the future? Need to continue leveraging for quality in bilateral or multilateral fora. No focus on quality of the learners - ECCE

13. © Plan Conclusions Low investement in Basic Education Hardly no efforts towards ECCE Trend: Scaling down bilateral – scaling up FTI FTI as compensation for scaling down in bi- lateral aid? Complete compensation? FTI as additional education funding? Quality focus exists but questions remain regarding the impact: since investments in general are low The future: since bilateral aid is beign scaled down with the risk of a loss of capacity

14. © Plan Recommendations (1) Increase investment in basic education levels FTI Bilateral Focus on quality and equity not only on increasing access Focus on pre-primary and primary education Align bi-lateral Aid with FTI Bilateral aid for FTI endorsed Education Sector Plan’s Support for Education Sector Plan Development for partner countries ‘on-route’ to FTI-funding (Uganda, DR Congo, Burundi*, Tanzania …) Advocate ‘Quality’ and ‘ECCE’ in FTI donor groups

15. © Plan Recommendations (2) Use strong Belgian position in LICs and some conflict ridden countries to promote education where it is most needed Focus on effective Education Aid (vs. imputed student costs?) Push internationally for more global support for education and a Global Fund for Education Moscow Framework for Action on ECCE