Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Greening the future Cohesion Policy

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Greening the future Cohesion Policy"— Presentation transcript:

1 Greening the future Cohesion Policy
Thessaloniki, Georges Kremlis, Head of Unit, Cohesion Policy & Environmental Impact Assessments, DG ENVIRONMENT European Commission

2 Sixth Environmental Action Programme (6th EAP)
Full co-decision Four main priorities Climate change Biodiversity Sustainable use of resources Links with health Seven thematic Strategies (Clean Air for Europe, Soil Protection, Sustainable Use of Pesticides, Protection and Conservation of the Marine Environment, Waste Prevention and Recycling, Sustainable Use of Natural Resources, Urban Environment)

3 Environment and Lisbon (I)
Environment is a new “industry” Over 1.5 m jobs in Germany (more than car or food sectors), 1 in 6 jobs and 9% of GDP in Wales Over 2.2 m jobs in EU eco-technology industries EU is a world leader in eco-technologies – over €400mn trade surplus for air and water in 2004 Waste prevention and efficient use of resources save companies money Environmental standards act as a strong dynamic for “innovation” High environmental standards are essential to maintain the integrity of the single market - avoiding eco-protectionism

4 Environment and Lisbon (II)
Postponing action now will cost more in the future Health costs of no further action on air - € bn Recent costs of extreme weather events - $27bn global insured losses in 2004 Insurance industry estimates of costs of climate change - $100bn pa in 2010

5 Implementation deficit
Some 1200 open cases on environment 25% of total Commission case load Nature Environmental impact assessment Waste Water Pro-active approach to helping Member States Meetings Guidelines Infringements / Court action / fines

6 New Member States More than 10 years of alignment with environmental acquis through pre-accession strategies Rich in biodiversity (e.g. eastern Poland – Via Baltica) Significant improvements have occurred in air and water quality resulting in better health Investment needed of € billion for compliance with environmental acquis in EU 10 Transition periods for investment heavy acquis

7 What we have achieved so far 2000-6 – environmental financing
Around 16% foreseen for environment in Objectives 1 & 2 in EU (“vertical” and “horizontal” integration) 50% of the Cohesion Fund (CF) set aside for environmental infrastructure in EU25 (mainly “vertical” integration) – but share not always achieved in all countries Increase by 75% of expenditure on environment from period in EU15 Around €8 billion for EU for environment for SF, CF, ISPA, PHARE & SAPARD

8 What we have achieved so far 2000-6 – environmental compliance
Natura 2000 (Commissioner letter; complementary Guidelines 2003) - precautionary approach applied for last 3 years in EU25 with need to provide lists before potentially damaging projects implemented; commitment to co-finance Natura 2000 network Nitrates Directive (Commissioner letter) - similar approach to Natura 2000 on designating nitrate vulnerable zones Waste plans (Guidelines of 1999) – e.g. requirements in Community Support Framework for Italy in absence of agreed waste plan Environmental Impact Assessment consolidation (acquis) – e.g. negotiation of Operational Programmes sped up regional implementation in Italy Urban wastewater Treatment (Commissioner letter) – Ireland/Cohesion Fund due to lack of designation of sensitive areas Dams (Commissioner letter) – Cohesion Fund for environmental purposes not agricultural Water Framework Directive (complementary Guidelines of 2003) – requirement for water investments to be in line with WFD Polluter Pays, Prevention and Precautionary principles (Treaty)

9 Environment in the future Cohesion Policy
General Provisions Regulation – investments must reflect Community environmental and sustainable development priorities (Art. 3), respect of acquis (Art. 8), environmental partners (Art. 10) High priority to environment and risks in proposed ERDF Regulation Investment heavy environmental projects and sustainable energy and transport projects in proposed CF Capacity Building in ESF Draft CSG Guidelines of contain strong messages throughout to invest in environment contributing to renewed Lisbon Agenda and the Sustainable Development Strategy

10 improving the environmental contribution to growth and jobs
In particular CSG: Making Europe and its regions a more attractive place to invest and work expand and improve transport infrastructure -sustainable urban and inter-urban transport improving the environmental contribution to growth and jobs infrastructures for air, water, waste, nature and species protection in Convergence regions promoting landuse planning to reduce urban sprawl, physical rehabilitation including natural and cultural assets Investment to promote Kyoto commitments in addition to those to promote sustainable energy and transport Risk prevention through improved management of natural resources, RTD, ICTs and public management policies addressing Europe’s intensive use of traditional energy sources – renewable energies and energy efficiency

11 DG ENV – investment priorities in line with CSG for NSRFs and OPs
Water investments in line with Water Framework Directive (urban wastewater treatment, water supply) Waste management in line with agreed waste plans Combating climate change (sustainable energy and transport in Cohesion Fund), air pollution, Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control Urban transport/urban environmental policy Natura 2000 Natural and Technological Risks Coastal zones (EUROSION study) To be included as funding priorities

12 DG ENV – cross-cutting principles for NSRFs and OPs
Article 6 of Treaty of European Union – environment as a cross-cutting principle with a view to promoting sustainable development Respect of environmental acquis Ensure NSRFs refer to 6th EAP and SDS Regional Agenda 21 – regional sustainable development Partnership principle - environmental partners (authorities and NGOs involved in all stages) Selection criteria – Bonuses, Integrated Product Policy, green public procurement, sustainable construction Evaluation requirements – SEA and EIA Directives Indicators Environmental capacity building Environmental networks, Theme Managers Synergies with other Community co-financing To be mentioned in the NSRFs and/or OPs

13 The SEA Directive (2001/42/EC) and the future Cohesion Policy
Report due to Council and EP on relationship between SEA Directive and Community co-financing, December 2005 (Art. 12(4)) Commission Methodological Working Paper on –to be discussed with MSs on Ex-Ante Evaluation contains annex on SEA Interreg IIIC (south-west UK led) Greening Regional Development Programmes (GRDP) SEA Handbook – to be discussed and at ENEA Plenary

14 SEA and the new Regulations – does SEA apply in principle?
Current exclusion for Structural Funds and EAGGF (Art. 3(9)) not extended to the next programming period Plans and programmes co-financed by the European Community are included in the scope of the SEA Directive (art. 2) SEA will be applicable to plans / programmes drawn up under the new Regulations as to any other plan and programme

15 SEA and the new Regulations – to what will SEA apply?
Plans and programmes co-financed under new Regulations will have to be checked against the Directive’s « tests » (Art. 2, definition of plan/ programme and Art. 3, scope) If they meet all criteria, they will have to be subject to SEA

16 SEA - an important message
The SEA Directive invites to avoid duplication of assessment, e.g. for plans which form part a hierarchy When deciding on the « scope » of the assessment, consider at what stage and level of the decision-making process the assessment should be best carried out Information obtained at other levels in the decision-making process / through other EC legislation may be used

17 European Network of Environmental Authorities for the Cohesion Policy (ENEA)
Composed of EU Member States (mainly environmental ministries), environmental NGOs, international organisations (Regional Environmental Center (REC), EEA, GRDP and Commission services (REGIO, ENV, EMPL, TREN, etc.) Meetings , , Website:

18 Conclusion: overall message
Mutual beneficial relationship between cohesion and environmental policies: 1) Environment can be co-financed under all proposed Objectives - Convergence, Regional Competitiveness and Employment & Cooperation Cohesion policy finances environmental infrastructure and improvements Environment is a key factor of competitiveness – employment, investment, attractive environment (renewed Lisbon Strategy) 2) Compliance with EC environmental legislation can ensure sustainability

19 Thank you for your attention!


Download ppt "Greening the future Cohesion Policy"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google