1. Boulder Junction Park+

2. Boulder Junction Park+ model Existing condition Proposed development Conceptual build-out Built to be flexible as area develops Based on data from downtown parking assessments, as well as similar TOD communities

3. Discussion Topics Parking Generation Rates Evaluated Scenarios Existing Conditions Planned Development Conceptual Build Out Surrounding Development Initial Findings Next Steps

4. Parking Generation Rates Land Use Peak Hour Rate (1PM) Comparable ULI Rate Bank 2.64 City Park 1.171.66 General Retail 1.182.9 Industrial Retail 0.590.61 Office 1.333.15 Restaurant 9.4116.20 Townhouse 0.631.23 Peak hour rates are taken from similar Park+ modeling efforts, for areas with similar mixture of uses and geography. Industrial retail land use represents less intense commercial uses whose businesses are based in specialty products and services with a lessened parking demand. The use was compared to the warehouse ULI rate, which best represents arrival and demand patterns.

5. Evaluated Scenarios Existing Conditions Today’s Conditions Planned Development Hotel, transit, and mixed uses in southeast area Conceptual Build-Out Redevelopment of the remainder of the study area into a walkable, mixed-use district Surrounding Development Development just south and southwest of the study area

6. Existing Land Uses: Bank – 2,711 sq. ft. City Park – 1 acre General Retail – 35,452 sq. ft. Industrial Retail – 216,179 sq. ft. Office – 31,515 sq. ft. Restaurant – 1,534 sq. ft. Townhouse – 72 units Existing Conditions

7. Park+ Results: Demand: 280 spaces Supply: 741 spaces Surplus/Deficit: +461 spaces Observations: Existing land use configurations do not strain associated parking supply Steelyard development experiences higher parking demand Existing Conditions

8. Planned Development Area Total Land Use per AreaParking General Retail (sq. ft.) Office (sq. ft.) Residential (units) City Park (acres) Restaurant (sq. ft.) Transit Stop (boardings) Hotel (rooms) Parking Spaces 1--69----84 284,33264,7731781---295 3-3,000-----60 4-35,41216----67 5 --71-2,3471,000136391

9. Planned Development Park+ Results: Study Area Demand: 983 spaces Supply: 1,556 spaces Surplus/Deficit: +573 spaces Southeast corner of Study Area Demand: 220 spaces Supply: 391 spaces Surplus/Deficit: +171 spaces S’Park and S’Park West area Demand: 368 spaces Supply: 457 spaces Surplus/Deficit: +89 spaces

10. Planned Development Observations: The residential permit removes overflow spaces on-street provided to the general retail The new parking garage is well utilized overall, with user fluctuations throughout the day The proposed S’Park development has some demand issues based on reserve spaces

11. Planned Development The planned parking garage in the southeast corner of study area has the ability to support the planned development demand as well as future demand because of the shared parking opportunity, as outlined below.

12. Surrounding Development Area Total Land Use per Area Parking Supply OfficeResidential 1-264 units264 spaces 2 300,000 sq. ft. -500 spaces

13. Surrounding Development Park+ Results for Development South of Study Area: Demand: 587 spaces Supply: 726 spaces Surplus/Deficit: +139 spaces Observations: The development along Pearl Parkway, just south of the study area, are able to provide on-site parking for the users during the day, but at night the Solana apartments are unable to meet the demand of residents. The new garage public in the southeast corner is able to accommodate the unmet residential demand during the evening hours.

14. Surrounding Development Solana apartments provides 226 parking spaces, but is unable to meet the generated demand during evening and morning hours, as shown below.

15. Surrounding Development The unmet demand of approximately 70 spaces utilized the New Garage in the southeast corner that has the capability to accept the spillover from the Solana garage as well as additional demand during the morning and evening hours.

16. Conceptual Development Area Total Land Use per Area General Retail OfficeResidential 1 115,430 sq. ft. 154 units 2 13,542 sq. ft. 21 units 3 151,550 sq. ft. 202 units

17. Observations: Based on the configuration of the parcels, on-site parking should be able to be provided for all areas. Conceptual Development AreaDemand Needed Supply Supply/ Deficit 1493520+27 26270+8 3647660+13

18. Conceptual Development Based on the Area 3 parcel configuration and shared parking the site will be able to support multiple use development as well as provide on- site parking.

19. Results Existing conditions show the parking system being underutilized Residential permits in the Steel Yard create a slight parking deficit, that will need to be accommodated by some public parking The new parking garage is able to fully accommodate the planned development within the southeast corner of the study area, considering shared parking configuration The new garage is able to accommodate the unmet demand of approximately 70 spaces from surrounding development as well as future development The redevelopment of the Auto Dealership provides the opportunity to provide general retail, office, and condos as well as on-site public parking