1. Improving Outcomes for Diabetes in African Americans: Lessons Learned for REACH Charleston and Georgetown Diabetes Coalition Carolyn Jenkins, DrPH, APRN-BC, RD, FAAN Ann Darlington Edwards Chair and Professor Medical University of South Carolina phone: 843-792-4625 e-mail: jenkinsc@musc.edujenkinsc@musc.edu

2. Goals for Today Review diabetes statistics. Share some processes and outcomes from community-based participatory research and service learning. Review an expanded chronic care model for improving outcomes in African American communities. Explore needed community changes.

3. Diabetes is the Fifth Deadliest Disease in the U.S. and Its Prevalence is Increasing U.S. Prevalence (% of population) 1990 1999 4.9%  6.9% Lifetime Risk if Born in 2000 MalesFemales 33% 39% Whites: African Americans: 40% 50% 27% 31% Hispanics: 45% 53% Sources: American Diabetes Association: Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2002. Diabetes Care. 2003;26:917-932. Venkat Narayan KM, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Sorensen SW, Williamson DF. Lifetime risk of diabetes mellitus in the United States. JAMA. 2003;290:1884-1890. American Diabetes Association: Diabetes Statistics for African Americans. Available at: www.diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics/african-americans.jsp. Accessed March 14, 2005. American Diabetes Association: Diabetes Statistics for Latinos. Available at: www.diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics/latinos.jsp. Accessed March 14, 2005. 2005 7 to 9.6% 

4. How Serious Is Diabetes? Source: Venkat Narayan KM, Boyle JP, Thompson TJ, Sorensen SW, Williamson DF. Lifetime risk of diabetes mellitus in the United States. JAMA. 2003;290:1884-1890. It predictably affects both lifespan and quality of life MalesFemales 40 Age at diagnosis: Lost # of life years: 18- 20 21 - 24 11 - 13 12 - 17 Lost # of quality-adjusted life years:

5. The Burden of Diabetes Is Greater for Minority Populations in the United States 2.7 million (11.4%) over age 20 –60% higher than in whites Higher complication rates –2X as likely to suffer lower-limb amputations –2X as likely to suffer from diabetes-related blindness Diabetes in African Americans Diabetes affects: Sources: American Diabetes Association: Diabetes Statistics for African Americans. Available at: www.diabetes.org/diabetes- statistics/african-americans.jsp. Accessed March 14, 2005. American Diabetes Association: Diabetes Statistics for Latinos. Available at: www.diabetes.org/diabetes- statistics/latinos.jsp. Accessed March 14, 2005. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Diabetes trends in the U.S.: 1990-1998. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:1278-1283. 10.8% of African Americans 10.6% of Hispanics 6.2% of Whites

6. The Financial Impact of Diabetes Is Staggering Total Health Care Costs in 2007 Per capital costs averaged $11,744 Indirect Expenditures: $58B Diabetes: $132B Lost workdays Restricted activity days Mortality Permanent disability Diabetes Care $27B Related Complications $58B Other Medical Care $31B Direct Expenditures: $92B Source: American Diabetes Association: Economic Costs of Diabetes in the U.S. in 2007. Diabetes Care. 2008;31,1-20.

7. Diabetes Costs Annual health care costs for people with diabetes: $11,744. One of every 5 health care $ spent caring for person with diabetes. One of every 10 health care $ is attributed to diabetes. –Costs for people with diabetes 2.3 X higher than those without diabetes. Annual health care costs for people with diabetes: $11,744. One of every 5 health care $ spent caring for person with diabetes. One of every 10 health care $ is attributed to diabetes. –Costs for people with diabetes 2.3 X higher than those without diabetes. Diabetes Care 2008

8. South Carolina Statistics In 2005 BRFSS: –10.3% reported they had diabetes African Americans (15.4%) Non-Hispanic Whites (8.4%) –Insulin treated (29.5%) –“Pills” (72.9%) –A1C test in past year (77%) –Never had A1c (23%) –Diabetic eye disease (21.7%) –No insurance and/or no doctor (~18%) African Americans (26.6%) Non-Hispanic whites (15.1%) In 2005 BRFSS: –10.3% reported they had diabetes African Americans (15.4%) Non-Hispanic Whites (8.4%) –Insulin treated (29.5%) –“Pills” (72.9%) –A1C test in past year (77%) –Never had A1c (23%) –Diabetic eye disease (21.7%) –No insurance and/or no doctor (~18%) African Americans (26.6%) Non-Hispanic whites (15.1%)

9. Risk Factors Among African Americans in SC Current Overweight Sedentary HBP Diabetes High Smoker Obesity Lifestyle Cholesterol Diabetes in SC: Two-thirds of people with diabetes die of heart disease and stroke 1 of every 7 African-Americans has diabetes, which is 80% higher than rate for non-Hispanic whites.

10. Diabetes in African Americans in South Carolina In Charleston and Georgetown Counties, 21% of African Americans reported having diabetes (2005 RRFS) Rural African Americans with diabetes: –60.6 % have inadequate control versus 42.5% of urban whites (SC BRFSS) In Charleston and Georgetown Counties, 21% of African Americans reported having diabetes (2005 RRFS) Rural African Americans with diabetes: –60.6 % have inadequate control versus 42.5% of urban whites (SC BRFSS)

11. Disease risk, diagnosis, progression of disease, response to treatment, caregiving, and overall quality of life are all affected by a number of variables including race, ethnicity, gender, socioeconomic status, age, education, occupation, country of origin, and perhaps other lifetime and lifestyle differences.

12. DIABETES-ATLAS Conceptual Model National Minority Health Month Foundation (2007) http://www.nmhmf.org/diabetes_initiative.aspx

13. Percentage of the 2005 Population Diagnosed with diabetes

15. 1994-present CBPAR Activities and Diabetes Management

16. From Meredith Minkler, DrPH University of California, Berkeley

17. Enterprise Neighborhood Health Program (1994 – 1998) HUD Grant with Charleston’s Enterprise Community to a) recruit and train community leaders to become Community Health Advocates; b) conduct needs assessment. –Needs assessment identified diabetes and HTN as priority issues. –61 community health advisors trained. –Video documenting needs and assets using community voices –AKA Summer Enrichment Program for children

18. Diabetes Initiative of South Carolina 1994—Report to SC Legislature on “Scope and Problems of Diabetes in SC” Funding by State Legislature to create Center to address diabetes in SC –Center of Excellence at MUSC Professional Council Outreach Council Surveillance Council Annual Report on activities and outcomes to South Carolina Legislature and Governor 1994—Report to SC Legislature on “Scope and Problems of Diabetes in SC” Funding by State Legislature to create Center to address diabetes in SC –Center of Excellence at MUSC Professional Council Outreach Council Surveillance Council Annual Report on activities and outcomes to South Carolina Legislature and Governor

19. Enterprise Health Center 1995 - 2001 Donation of Lot Building Completed Opened November 2001 Now a FQHC site (FCFFHC)

20. Service-Learning An educational methodology based on a community-campus partnership which combines student community service with explicit learning objectives. Students participating in service-learning are not only expected to provided direct community service but also to learn about the context in which the service is provided, and to understand the connection between the service and their academic coursework. Seifer 1998

21. Service Learning with Students >700 students (MUSC, Clemson, Howard, USC, Rhode Island, UNC) 7 Doctoral Candidates/Graduates 6 Certified Diabetes Educators 7 doctoral dissertations 3 masters thesis 20 regional or national presentations 10 peer-reviewed publications

22. Healthy South Carolina Hypertension and Diabetes Management and Education Program (HAD-ME) Health care team conducted weekly screening, management, and education clinics (with linkages to primary care) in inner-city neighborhoods (1997-2001) –> 900 community residents with diabetes and/or hypertension participated. –> 1,100 referrals to primary care –Significant decreases in BP, blood glucose, and weight

23. REACH 2010: Charleston And Georgetown Diabetes Coalition’s Efforts to Decrease Disparities for Diabetes Arlene Case-The Lesson

24. A heath disparity population is “a population where there is significant disparity in the overall rate of disease incidence, prevalence, morbidity, mortality, or survival rates in the population as compared to the health status of the general population” 1. Minority Health and Health Disparities Research and Education Act of 2000

25. REACH 2010: Charleston and Georgetown Diabetes Coalition Tennessee South Carolina SC DHEC Region 6 Georgetown Diabetes CORE Group St. James Santee Health Center Enterprise Health Center Enterprise Community Tri County Black Nurses MUSC MUHA Diabetes Initiative College of Nursing Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority Franklin C. Fetter Family Health Center Trident United Way Georgetown North Carolina Georgia Charleston County Library Statewide REACH home-based in Columbia:  Communicare  SC DHEC  SC DPCP Carolina Center for Medical Excellence TriCounty Family Ministeries SC DHEC Region 7 County Library East Cooper Community Outreach S. Santee St. James Senior Center

26. Methods and Interventions Community skill-building and neighborhood clinicsCommunity skill-building and neighborhood clinics –175 lay educators trained –Diabetes self management education –Foot care training –Wise Woman for AA women 40-70 years old Community health professional trainingCommunity health professional training –145 RNs with advanced foot/wound education –27 physicians with foot care education Outreach by professional and lay educatorsOutreach by professional and lay educators –30 minute TV program aired 34 times on cable –Library program/Internet use –Weekly diabetes management classes in 8 sites Health systems changeHealth systems change –Registry and reminder system –CQI teams Coalition building and policy changeCoalition building and policy change

27. Skill-Building for CHAs and Volunteers Neighborhood Walk and Talk Groups Individual and Group Education Sessions Community and Media Activities reached >40,000 African Americans Community Screening and Education

28. Percent with > Annual A1c by Race (increased from 76.8% in 1999 to 97.1% in 2006)

29. Percent with > Annual Lipid Profile by Race (increased from 47.3% in 1999 to 87.2% in 2006)

30. Percent with Kidney Testing (microalbuminuria) by Race (increase from 13.4% in 1999 to 56% in 2006)

31. Percent with > Annual Foot Exam by Race (increased from 64.1% in 1999 to 97.3% in 2006)

32. Percent with BP < 130/80 by Race (increased from 24% in 1999 to 38.2% in 2006)

33. Percent of Visits with Teaching by Race (increased from 41% in 1999 to 93% in 2006)

34. Lower Extremity Amputations (1999-2002) Charleston County

36. www.musc.edu/reach

37. Although studies documenting disparities are not in short supply, findings about what works to reduce disparities are. A 3-year, $6-million program called Finding Answers: Disparities Research for Change, sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, seeks to identify effective interventions to eliminate disparities. Under the direction of Marshall Chin, MD, MPH, an associate professor of medicine at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, the program reviewed more than 200 journal articles on disparity reduction interventions in cardiovascular disease, depression, diabetes, and breast cancer. The results appeared in October 2007 in a supplement to Medical Care Research and Review. One of the few studies in the review that showed a reduction in racial disparities was part of the Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH 2010) program, sponsored by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Ga. The demonstration program, which took place in Charleston and Georgetown counties in South Carolina, brought together 28 community partners, from health professionals to college sororities and local media, that set goals to improve diabetes care for blacks as well as eliminate health care disparities between black and white patients with diabetes. The partners documented disparities in care for 12,000 black patients with diabetes in the 2- county community. The intervention included such community activities as health fairs, support groups, grocery store tours, community clinics, and church-based educational programs. After 24 months, the partners audited medical charts for 158 black patients and 112 patients who were white or of other racial or ethnic groups. They found that differences between black and white patients in rates of hemoglobin A1c testing, lipid and kidney testing, eye examinations, and blood pressure control that had ranged from 11% to 28% at baseline had been eliminated (Jenkins C et al. Public Health Rep. 2004;119[3]:322-330). Chin is optimistic that other communities will develop their own, similar programs in the future. "There are a lot of promising models," he says. "But you may have to revise as you go along, just like in patient care." Quote from R. Voelker in JAMA 2008;299(12):1411-1413. Although studies documenting disparities are not in short supply, findings about what works to reduce disparities are. A 3-year, $6-million program called Finding Answers: Disparities Research for Change, sponsored by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, seeks to identify effective interventions to eliminate disparities. Under the direction of Marshall Chin, MD, MPH, an associate professor of medicine at the University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, the program reviewed more than 200 journal articles on disparity reduction interventions in cardiovascular disease, depression, diabetes, and breast cancer. The results appeared in October 2007 in a supplement to Medical Care Research and Review. One of the few studies in the review that showed a reduction in racial disparities was part of the Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health (REACH 2010) program, sponsored by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, Ga. The demonstration program, which took place in Charleston and Georgetown counties in South Carolina, brought together 28 community partners, from health professionals to college sororities and local media, that set goals to improve diabetes care for blacks as well as eliminate health care disparities between black and white patients with diabetes. The partners documented disparities in care for 12,000 black patients with diabetes in the 2- county community. The intervention included such community activities as health fairs, support groups, grocery store tours, community clinics, and church-based educational programs. After 24 months, the partners audited medical charts for 158 black patients and 112 patients who were white or of other racial or ethnic groups. They found that differences between black and white patients in rates of hemoglobin A1c testing, lipid and kidney testing, eye examinations, and blood pressure control that had ranged from 11% to 28% at baseline had been eliminated (Jenkins C et al. Public Health Rep. 2004;119[3]:322-330). Chin is optimistic that other communities will develop their own, similar programs in the future. "There are a lot of promising models," he says. "But you may have to revise as you go along, just like in patient care." Quote from R. Voelker in JAMA 2008;299(12):1411-1413.

38. REACH US: SouthEastern African American Center of Excellence for Eliminating Disparities for Diabetes REACH US SEA-CEED

39. REACH US Center of Excellence A coordinated multi-system, multi- media, intergenerational approach to prevention and control of diabetes and its cardiovascular complications to eliminate health disparities in African Americans at risk and with diabetes.

40. Geographical Areas: African Americans with Diabetes and Stroke in North Carolina, South Carolina Georgia

41. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention REACH US CEED MUSC College of Nursing Diabetes Initiative of South Carolina College of Nursing REACH US Charleston and Georgetown Diabetes Coalition Community and Systems ChangeHealth Systems Change National African American Networks Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority Black Nurses Association (Professional Organization) Urban League Baptist Association and COOLJC Regional and National Networks Southeastern Region of American Diabetes Association Carolinas and Georgia Chapter off American Society of HTN National and Regional Network of Libraries of Medicine Stroke Belt Counties in Georgia, SC, NC Statewide Institutions Diabetes Initiative of South Carolina South Carolina DHEC Diabetes Prevention and Control Program Medical University of South Carolina Center for Health Care Disparities South Carolina State Library

42. What is needed to improve diabetes care and outcomes in African Americans in South Carolina?

43. IOM’s 8 Competency Areas Informatics Genomics Cultural competence Communications Community based participatory research Ethics Policy and law Global health Gebbie et al. (2001)

44. Evidence-Based Practice Practice supported by research findings and/or demonstrated as being effective through a critical examination and review of current and past practices. EBP integrates patient preferences with research evidence, to determine best course of action to improve health.

45. 45 Listen to the Stories While the stories are being told, don’t offer solutions too early!! Work together to identify the issues and develop the solutions.

46. 46 Go to the people. Live among the people. Learn from the people. Work with the people. Start with what the people know. Build on what the people have. Teach by showing, learn by doing. Not a showcase but a pattern. Not odds and ends, but a system. Not piece meal, but an integrated approach.

47. Social & Economic Policies Institutions Neighborhoods/Communities Living Conditions Social Relationships Individual Risk Factors Genetic/Constitutional Factors Pathophysiologic Pathways Individual and Population Health Life Course Environment Determinants of Health from National Academy of Sciences, Epidemiology Review 2004;26:124-125

48. Informed, Activated Patient Productive Interactions Prepared, Proactive Practice Team Improved Outcomes Delivery System Design Decision Support Clinical Information Systems Self- Management Support Health System Resources and Policies Community Health Care Organization Chronic Care Model Wagner, E. H. (1998). Chronic disease management: What will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Effective Clinical Practice(1), 2-4.

49. A Model for Chronic Illness Care Delivery System Design Decisio n Support Clinical Information Systems Self-Management Support Health System Organization Links to Community Resources Leadership support Provider participation Coherent system QI Guidelines Provider education Expert support Registry Info for care management Performance data Care man. roles Practice team Care coordination Proactive follow-up Planned visit Visit system changes Patient education Patient activation Self-management assessment Self-management resources Collaboration on decisions Guidelines to patients For patients For community Adapted from: Wagner, E. H. (1998). Chronic disease management: What will it take to improve care for chronic illness? Effective Clinical Practice(1), 2-4.

50. World Health Organization Social Ecology Adaptation of Wagner’s Chronic Care Model Notice the added community involvement Still low on patient, family & social network participation or accounting for sociocultural variations Taken from Epping-Jordan, J., Pruitt, S., Bengoa, R., and Wagner, E. (2004). Improving the quality of health care for chronic conditions. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 13, 200- 305. doi:10.1136/qshc.2004.010744

51. Community Resource Systems 2 Community Information System Community & Service System Design Community Decision Support Self-Management Support Clinical Information System Delivery System Design Clinical Decision Support Patient Self- Management Support Prepared, Proactive Health Systems Policies & Actions Social, Health, & Economic Informed, Activated Persons External Environment, 1 Resources, and Dissemination influences: Prepared, Proactive Community Systems Improved Community-Wide Health Outcomes and Elimination of Health Disparities Influences Health Care Provider Systems Conceptual Model for REACH US: Charleston and Georgetown Diabetes Coalition (adapted from Jenkins et al., Barr et al., Wagner) 1 Environment is viewed through an ecological framework and includes social, political, and economical aspects. 2 To categorize the various community resource systems, we use the Community Systems Wheel (Anderson and McFarland, 2006). The systems include: Health and Social Services, Politics and Government, Safety & Transportation, Education, Communication, Economics, Recreation, and Physical Environment. We added Faith-based Services.

52. Community-Based Participatory Action Research A collaborative approach to research that equitably involves all partners in the research process and recognizes the unique strengths that each brings. CBPR begins with a research topic of importance to the community, has the aim of combining knowledge with action and achieving social change. WK Kellogg Foundation Community Health Scholars Program

53. Fundamental Characteristics of CBPAR It is: –participatory. –cooperative, engaging community members and researcher(s) in a joint process with both contributing equally. –a co-learning process. –an empowerment process through which participants can increase control over their lives. It is: –participatory. –cooperative, engaging community members and researcher(s) in a joint process with both contributing equally. –a co-learning process. –an empowerment process through which participants can increase control over their lives.

54. 54 Fundamental Characteristics of CBPAR It involves systems development and local community capacity building. It achieves a balance between research and action. (Israel et al. 1998) It involves sharing of funding among partners (usually equally). It involves systems development and local community capacity building. It achieves a balance between research and action. (Israel et al. 1998) It involves sharing of funding among partners (usually equally).

55. Understanding cultures –Community culture –Academic and institutional culture Differing philosophies. Sharing of budgets in an equitable way. Clearly defining and continuously implementing our principles for the partnership in a fair and equitable way. Understanding cultures –Community culture –Academic and institutional culture Differing philosophies. Sharing of budgets in an equitable way. Clearly defining and continuously implementing our principles for the partnership in a fair and equitable way. Identified Challenges for Communities and Academic Institutions

56. Instructions for Community for Partnering with Academic Institutions--Look For People that: Begin their discussions with you by asking questions, rather than offering solutions. Recognize the gap between measuring differences and making differences. Demonstrate a willingness to help you measure the differences you make. Share control over financial resources and decisions with community representatives. Express commitment to a working relationship built on trust and equity. Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 January; 1(1): A12. Begin their discussions with you by asking questions, rather than offering solutions. Recognize the gap between measuring differences and making differences. Demonstrate a willingness to help you measure the differences you make. Share control over financial resources and decisions with community representatives. Express commitment to a working relationship built on trust and equity. Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 January; 1(1): A12.

57. Common Characteristics of Successful Community- Institutional Partnerships Trusting relationships Equitable processes and procedures Diverse membership Tangible benefits to all partners Balance between partnership process, activities, and outcomes Significant community involvement in scientifically sound research (Continued on next slide) Trusting relationships Equitable processes and procedures Diverse membership Tangible benefits to all partners Balance between partnership process, activities, and outcomes Significant community involvement in scientifically sound research (Continued on next slide) Seifer, 2006

58. Common Characteristics of Successful Community-Institutional Partnerships Supportive organizational policies/reward structure Leadership at multiple levels Culturally competent and appropriately skilled staff and researchers Collaborative dissemination Ongoing partnership assessment, improvement and celebration Sustainable impact Supportive organizational policies/reward structure Leadership at multiple levels Culturally competent and appropriately skilled staff and researchers Collaborative dissemination Ongoing partnership assessment, improvement and celebration Sustainable impact Seifer, 2006

59. Recommendations for Emerging and Established Partnerships Pay close attention to membership issues Build on prior history of positive working relationships Obtain support and involvement of both top leadership and “front line” staff of partner organizations Embrace diversity in the partnership Decide who the “community” is and who “represents” the community. Pay close attention to membership issues Build on prior history of positive working relationships Obtain support and involvement of both top leadership and “front line” staff of partner organizations Embrace diversity in the partnership Decide who the “community” is and who “represents” the community. Seifer, 2006

60. Recommendations for Emerging and Established Partnerships (continued) Develop rationale, criteria and procedures for adding new partners Develop structures and processes that facilitate the development of trust and sharing of influence and control among partners Jointly develop partnership principles and operating procedures Jointly create mission, vision, and priorities for the partnership Develop rationale, criteria and procedures for adding new partners Develop structures and processes that facilitate the development of trust and sharing of influence and control among partners Jointly develop partnership principles and operating procedures Jointly create mission, vision, and priorities for the partnership Seifer, 2006

61. Recommendations for Emerging and Established Partnerships (continued) Strive to achieve an equitable distribution of costs, benefits, and resources among the partners Conduct ongoing evaluation of partnership process Build the capacity of all partners Plan ahead for sustainability Pay close attention to the balance of activities within the partnership Be strategic about dissemination Strive to achieve an equitable distribution of costs, benefits, and resources among the partners Conduct ongoing evaluation of partnership process Build the capacity of all partners Plan ahead for sustainability Pay close attention to the balance of activities within the partnership Be strategic about dissemination Seifer, 2006

62. Build Capacity of All Partners Facilitate partner training, technical assistance and continuing education Invest partnership resources in local community Establish and maintain partnership infrastructure Facilitate partner training, technical assistance and continuing education Invest partnership resources in local community Establish and maintain partnership infrastructure Seifer, 2006

63. 63 Cultural Humility: “A life long commitment to self evaluation and self critique” to redress power imbalances and “develop and maintain respectful and dynamic partnerships with communities” Tervalon & Garcia, 1998

64. 64 Assets in Community From: Kretzmann & McKnight. (1993) Building Communities from the Inside Out

65. 65 Identifying Natural Community Leaders  When you have a problem, who do you go to for advice?  Who do others go to?  When people in the neighborhood have come together around a problem in the past, did a particular individual or group play a key role?  What things do people tell you you’re good at? Eng et al, 1990; Israel, 1985; Sharpe, 2000

66. Insider-Outsider Tensions Power dynamics; the “power of authority” of the outsider’s often multiple sources of unspoken privilege (Wallerstein, 1999) Conflicting time tables & demands Differential reward structures (Minkler, 2006) Power dynamics; the “power of authority” of the outsider’s often multiple sources of unspoken privilege (Wallerstein, 1999) Conflicting time tables & demands Differential reward structures (Minkler, 2006)

67. Perceived clash between community desires and “good science”

68. 68 “We want to know how much you care, before we know how much you know.” Alma Joseph Flores Alma Joseph Flores Enterprise Community Enterprise Community

69. Partnership A strategic combining of resources that create power far beyond the capabilities of individual players working alone.

70. Thanks to Our Team (and to you)! REACH Community Partners and Staff –Gayenell Magwood, Barbara Carlson, Jane Zapka, Martina Mueller, Leonard Egede, Marilyn Laken, Montrese Edwards, Virginia Thomas, Joyce Linnen, Lee Moultrie, Sonja Smalls, Syndia Moultrie, Karen Hill, George Bush REACH Partners Coaltion Charleston Diabetes Coalition Georgetown Diabetes CORE Group Diabetes Initiative of South Carolina –Dr.John Colwell –Dr. Kathie Hermayer –Dr. Dan Lackland –Dr. Brent Egan –Pamela Arnold SC Diabetes Prevention and Control Program Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Institutes of Health-NIDDK American Diabetes Association