1. Data Interpretation ACCESS for ELLs® The Rhode Island Department of Education Presented by Bob Measel ELL Specialist Office of Instruction, Assessment, and Curriculum

2. We’re going to cover…  The WIDA ELP standards and assessment framework  Organization of the standards and assessment  Data produced by the ACCESS for ELLs®  How to interpret the data produced by the ACCESS test  How the data inform instruction  Accountability under Title III

3. ELPS Summative The WIDA ELP standards and assessment framework Research on second language development Formative Instruction ELP Assessment (ACCESS for ELLs®) Assessment Data Performance Definitions

4. The WIDA ELPS

5. 5

6. 6 Framework for Formative and Summative Assessment English Language Proficiency Standards Language Domains (R,W,S,L) Grade Level Clusters ELP Levels Model Performance Indicators Model Performance Indicators (MPIs) are the lowest level of expression of the Standards and where test items begin Content Areas (S&I, ELA, MA, SC, SS)

7. ` ` ELP Levels

8. ` ` ENTERING BEGINNING DEVELOPING EXPANDING 1 2 3 4 5 6 REACHING BRIDGING

10. The ACCESS for ELLs® is divided into five glade level clusters: K 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-12

11. Each grade level cluster except kindergarten is divided into three tiers (A, B, & C) Tiers were developed to avoid: attempting to assess high levels of ELP for students at low levels of ELP assessing low levels of ELP for students at high levels of ELP

12. Level 1 Entering Level 2 Beginning Level 3 Developing Level 4 Expanding Level 5 Bridging Level 6 Reaching

13. Level 1 Entering Level 2 Beginning Level 3 Developing Level 4 Expanding Level 5 Bridging Level 6 Reaching

14. Level 1 Entering Level 2 Beginning Level 3 Developing Level 4 Expanding Level 5 Bridging Level 6 Reaching

15. Level 1 Entering Level 2 Beginning Level 3 Developing Level 4 Expanding Level 5 Bridging Level 6 Reaching

16. There are only two effects that the wrong tier can have for a student Bottom line… Tiers do NOT affect a students’ score 1.A low level student scores zero because he/she cannot answer any questions 2.A high level student scores perfect and caps out

17. K 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-12

18. K 1-2 3-5 6-8 9-12

19. Tier A Tier B Tier C 1-2 Each test has four sections: Listening, Reading, Writing, and Speaking

20. 20 Framework for Formative and Summative Assessment English Language Proficiency Standards Language Domains (R,W,S,L) Grade Level Clusters ELP Levels Model Performance Indicators Model Performance Indicators (MPIs) are the lowest level of expression of the Standards and where test items begin Content Areas (S&I, ELA, MA, SC, SS)

21. Model Performance Indicators Model Performance Indicators (MPIs) are the lowest level of expression of the Standards and where test items begin

25. Scores produced by the ACCESS test

26. The raw score is simply the number of correct responses in each section out of the number possible Psychometrically derived measures of proficiency Range from 100 to 600 Single vertical scale applies to all grades and test forms Vertically equated scale scores take into account grade level differences

27. Scores produced by the ACCESS test Socially derived interpretation of the scale score Range from 1.0 to 6.0 First number indicates the proficiency level into which the student’s scale score places him or her (e.g. 2 = Beginning) Second number indicates how far, in tenths, the student’s scale score places him or her between the lower and the higher cut score of the proficiency level (e.g. 2.5 = 5/10 or ½ of the way between the cut score for level 2 and level 3) NEVER, NEVER, NEVER, Round up!

28. Scores produced by the ACCESS test Some examples….

29. Scores produced by the ACCESS test Some examples….

30. Scores produced by the ACCESS test

32. Composite Scores ======== Listening (50%) Listening (30%) Reading (50%) Listening (15%) Speaking (50%) Reading (70%) Writing (50%) Speaking (15%) Reading (35%) Writing (35%) ++++++++

33. Score reports for ACCESS

34. Parent / Guardian Report

36. Teacher Report

37. Student Roster Report

38. School Frequency Report

40. ACTIVITY At your table, examine the score report that is assigned to your table. Answer the four guiding questions on the next slide. Record your notes to share with the group afterwards.

41. ACTIVITY - Guiding Questions -What is the purpose of the report? -What data are available? -How can the data be used?

42. TEACHER REPORT 291|------♦----|369

43. How the data inform instruction At your table, have a look at the sample ACCESS teacher report. Discuss what the data are indicating. What implications does this have for instruction? For curriculum? Now let’s have a look at how the WIDA ELPS framework comes into the equation….

44. ELPS Summative Research on second language development Formative Instruction ELP Assessment (ACCESS for ELLs®) Assessment Data Performance Definitions How the data inform instruction CAN-DO Descriptors

45. Know your ELLs’ proficiency levels - (ACCESS results) Consider what your ELLs can do in relationship to the materials for your lesson (texts, worksheets, manipulatives, etc.), your lesson delivery, and the lesson activities. Can your ELLs read and comprehend the text? How will your ELLs participate in the instruction and activities? What scaffolds can you use and/or what accommodations can you make to help your ELLs access the content?

46. How much growth is enough? A couple of simple rules to keep in mind…. Lower is faster Higher is slower That is to say, that research shows us that students at higher proficiency levels and higher grades grow slower than students at lower proficiency levels and lower grades. For example, an eleventh grader at level 4.5 will make much smaller gains in a year than a second grader at level 2.1.

47. How much growth is enough? Refer to the handout entitled WIDA Focus on Growth. This is a product of research conducted by H Gary Cook at WCER. It provides growth profiles for students by grade and proficiency level. It also provides levels of average growth for districts.

48. How much growth is enough? First, find the column for the PL band that your student’s first score falls into. Second, calculate the growth from the first score to the second. In this case, we’re using the scale scores. Third, plot the growth on the y- axis over the initial proficiency level column (x-axis).

50. Rhode Island Exit Criteria There are three required criteria to exit an ELL from the ESL/BLE program: 1. ACCESS for ELLs ® Literacy Composite score ≥ 4.5 AND Comprehension Composite score ≥ 5.0 OR NECAP Reading score ≥ Level 3

51. Rhode Island Exit Criteria There are three required criteria to exit an ELL from the ESL/BLE program: 2. Any three of the following criteria:  Passing grades in all core content classes (as reflected on mid-year or end-of-year report card)  ESL/bilingual Education teacher recommendation  At least two general education core content teacher recommendations  At least three writing samples demonstrating skill not more than one year below grade level  Score on a district reading assessment not more than one year below grade level as defined by the publisher or the district

52. Rhode Island Exit Criteria There are three required criteria to exit an ELL from the ESL/BLE program: 3. The student is in grades 1-12 (Kindergarteners are not eligible for exit)

53. And now onto…

54. Accountability Systems NECAP All ELLs are required to take the Mathematics, Science, and Writing NECAP Recently arrived ELLs can be given a one-time exemption from the Reading NECAP ACCESS for ELLs® All ELLs are required to take the ACCESS each year (K-12)

55. Accountability Under Title III annual increases in the number or percentage of children making progress in learning English; annual increases in the number or percentage of children attaining English proficiency by the end of each school year, as determined by a valid and reliable assessment of English proficiency; and making adequate yearly progress for limited English proficient children

56. Growth expectation: Gain of ≥0.5 ACCESS for ELLs ® overall composite level for an individual student Starting point target: 27% of students making a gain of ≥0.5 ACCESS for ELLs ® overall composite level Ending point target: 56% of students making a gain of ≥0.5 ACCESS for ELLs ® overall composite level Confidence interval:95% Years from starting to ending: 2009-2010 to 2017-2018 (nine test administrations in an eight year span) Annual increases: 2010.target of 27% 2011.target of 30% 2012.target of 33% 2013.target of 36% 2014.target of 40% 2015.target of 44% 2016.target of 48% 2017.target of 52% 2018.target of 56% AMAO 1

57. AMAO 2 Definition of “attainment”: ACCESS for ELLs ® composite score ≥ 4.5. Scores from both Tier B and Tier C will be acceptable. For the Kindergarten ACCESS, the instructional score will be used. Starting point target: 18% of LEP students served by a subgrantee will score at or above the proficient level Ending point target: 34% of LEP students served by a subgrantee will score at or above the proficient level Confidence interval:95% Years from starting to ending: 2009-2010 to 2017-2018 Annual increases: 2010.target of 18% 2011.target of 19% 2012.target of 20% 2013.target of 21% 2014.target of 23% 2015.target of 25% 2016.target of 28% 2017.target of 31% 2018.target of 34%

59. 59 Bob Measel ELL Specialist Office of Instruction, Assessment, and Accountability Rhode Island Department of Education 255 Westminster Street Providence, RI 02903 robert.measel@ride.ri.gov Voice: 222-401-8480 Fax: 401-222-3605 Additional professional development on this topic, as well as others related to ESL, may be arranged by contacting: