Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Corrosion Impact of Cathodic Protection on Surrounding Structures

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Corrosion Impact of Cathodic Protection on Surrounding Structures"— Presentation transcript:

1 Corrosion Impact of Cathodic Protection on Surrounding Structures
Robert A. Durham, PE D2 Tech Solutions Marcus O. Durham, PhD, PE THEWAY Corp.

2 Introduction Corrosion not new topic – since history
Loss of material leaving a metal Flow through a medium Returns to metal at different point CATHODE ANODE

3 History Sir Humphry Davy, 1824 British ships copper clad corrosion
Proposed attaching zinc Considered impressed current Batteries not perfected

4 Takes Many Forms Oxidation, rust, chemical, bacteria
All are result of electrical current Treatments: chemical, coatings, electrical Proper impressed current can stop May not be practical CATHODE ZINC ANODE ELECTROLYTE

5 Mandatory Cathodic Protection
Underground metal pipe with hazardous gas or liquids Underground metal pipe within 10’ of steel reinforced concrete Water storage tanks >250,000 gallons

6 Fundamentals Components
Anode sacrifices metal, pos battery Cathode receives metal, neg battery Electrolyte, non-metallic medium, with some moisture to support current flow +ANODE ANODE -CATHODE CATHODE CHEMICAL

7 Fundamentals Circuit For corrosion to exist: Metal conductor
An electrolyte A potential difference #1 & #2 when pipe in soil or water #3 caused by environment or differences in electrochemical properties

8 Cause & Mitigation Same elements that cause corrosion
can be used to control Al electronegativity = 1.61 Fe electronegativity = 1.83 Result = electrochemical attraction Molecules from Al, thru electrolyte, to Fe Protect Fe

9 Cause & Mitigation If force Al to more negative (cathodic)
Fe molecules through electrolyte to Al Al is protected Can create problems if CP system fails Current flow takes unexpected path Protects and destroys wrong metal

10 Problem CP is common practice on vessels, wells and cross-country pipelines CP is designed to protect pipe or vessel Current can take unintended path Can create negative results on other metals Three cases examined

11 Case 1 Pipeline systems 2 with rectifiers 1 without, not petro
Rectifier at major lake crossing Nearby soil some limestone rocks High soil resistivity Near residences

12 Case 1 Problems @ residences Indications of compromised ground system
Corrosion of underground lines Ground wires corroded Electric shock from water exiting faucets Indications of compromised ground system

13 Case 1 Routine rectifier readings Complete path
Not intended Through residence metal Investigation, break in rectifier lead

14 Case 1 For corrosion to occur need electrical circuit
Without direct path thru anode, will find alternate path thru adjacent metal STRUCTURE - + ANODE SOIL ALTERNATE METAL PATH CORROSION POINT BREAK RECTIFIER

15 Case 1 Corrosion of water & sewer More serious
Costly & inconvenient More serious Electrical ground electrode conductor gone Propane lines damaged Routine maintenance may not catch slow trends

16 Case 2 Pipeline systems 3 with rectifiers 1 without, not petro
Rectifier on hill, ¾ mile from residence Nearby soil sandy w/ substantial sandstone High soil resistivity Very remote Near 1 residence with barns Near petroleum production

17 Case 2 Pipeline systems had –1.45 V pipe to soil
8 month period of problems All copper tubing in concrete floor replaced 3/4” copper supply replaced twice Computer monitor & TV failed due to voltage Multiple motors burned out Fluorescent lights not ignite

18 Case 2 Electrical safety Ground conductors Shock by water from shower
Shock when touch metal of pre-engineered building Hole burned in bldg from energized ground wire Ground conductors Electrician measure 40 volts on ground wire at service entrance Utility measured 90 volts on ground wire at pump station

19 Case 2 Problems Utility Rectifier grounding electrode, 178 Ohm
>5 times NEC allowance Ground rod driven only 5’ remainder sticking up Utility Meter ground corroded in two Ground resistance, 48 Ohms

20 Case 2 Problems pump station
1 pump 277 V 1-phase w/ no ground whatsoever Other sites ground electrode resistance of 750 – 1000 Ω Without ground stray currents travel along metal

21 Case 2 CP failure source of corrosion Pump station was source of shock
Plumbing and electrical Pump station was source of shock Inadequate grounding Need proper systems maintenance Other systems can complicate matters

22 Case 3 Well casing CP system 6500 feet, 5.5” steel
Penetrate variety of soils High pressure gas Known corrosion problems CP system Rectifier, 5 anodes 8 Amps impressed

23 Case 3 Routine 3 years, corrosion of pipe $350,000 replacement
Rectifier current read normal Pipe/soil readings not routine 3 years, corrosion of pipe $350,000 replacement

24 Case 3 Investigation Hammer union insulating flange shorted
Tank bottoms like new Pipeline pristine Casing eaten up Hammer union insulating flange shorted Current took preferential path thru line & tank

25 Electrical Bonding NEC requires grounding electrode
NEC requires bonding metal to ground Problems Steel, ductile or cast iron sacrifice to copper Bond Pipe, well casings, tanks etc. Not the grounding electrode w/o bonding, risk of shock

26 Electrical Bonding Bonding to ground will short CP to earth
Do not bond to CP system Precludes using large metal surface as grounding electrode CP has inherent personnel protection Drive potential ~ 1 volt negative Very low circuit resistance < 2Ω Adequate path for dissipation of current in a fault Use resistance bond for close metal

27 Standards Cases emphasize importance of proper C/P maintenance
Beyond monthly current reading Preserve integrity of system DOT regulated periodic maintenance Become more stringent December 29, 2003

28 Standards DOT 12/29/03 Protected Pipelines
a) Tests for corrosion once per year b) By Dec. 29, 2003, accomplish objectives of NACE RP c) Inspect removed pipe; if corrosion, inspect adjacent and correct Unprotected Pipe Electric corrosion survey every three years Rectifier Electrically check once every 2 months Reverse Current Switch Electrically check once per year Diodes Critical Interference Bonds Interference Bonds Breakout Tanks Inspect system per API RP 651

29 Standards Record keeping Tests
Show location of CP piping, CP facilities, anodes Neighboring structures bonded Maintain for life of pipeline Tests Tests, survey, or inspection per table Demonstrate adequacy Maintain 5 years Inspection of protected & critical interference bonds Life of pipeline

30 Standards 49 CFR Part 192 49 CFR Part 195 40 CFR Part 280 UL 1746
NACE RP0169 NACE RP0177 NACE RP0193 NACE RP0285 NACE RP0286 NACE RP0388 API RP 632 API RP 651 STI R892 STI R972

31

32 Installation & Maintenance
Initial Imperative to isolate protected pipe Visual and testing Check resistance between protected, ground, other If not open circuit -> problem Electrical w/in 5 feet Bond per NEC

33 Installation & Maintenance
Periodic current Show drastic changes Failed rectifier, broken connection Trend over time Decrease I Increase V Shows failing anode or connection

34 Installation & Maintenance
Annual 11 or 13 month cycle Over time will see all seasons and climatological conditions Complete periodic Same as initial Energized, so measure voltage difference not resistance Half-cell P-S, and ground bed to soil Rectifier

35 Conclusions Corrosion Happens CP sacrifices one metal to protect other
Requires complete path Failure may cause unintended path Resultant corrosion can be costly and compromise safety New regulations in effect Dec 29, 2003 With proper installation, maintenance and inspections CP can be safe and effective


Download ppt "Corrosion Impact of Cathodic Protection on Surrounding Structures"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google