1. WARNING! This may void your Manufactures warranty: Dissecting Revit Content with the Pros Jarrod Baumann BIM Manager – Tilden-Coil Constructors, Inc. Joel Londenberg BIM Manager – ACH Mechanical Contractors, Inc.

2. Class Summary With Building Information Modeling (BIM) being widely accepted and adopted, a wave of Revit MEP content is being produced by manufacturers. Knowing what to look for and what your models should contain can make or break your company's workflow. This class will serve as your MEP content crash course and you will learn how to separate the good Revit MEP content from the bad.

3. Who we are: Jarrod Baumann –BIM Manager –15 years AEC design and modeling experience –Active user of Revit since 2006 Joel Londenberg –BIM Manager –7 years AEC design and modeling experience –8 years manufactured equipment 3D design BIMAdvent

4. Learning Objectives Identify purpose driven, quality BIM content Identify key factors that make the transition from ‘Generic’ to Manufactured easier Identify key factors that truly hinder project performance, Myths vs. Facts Apply additional little-known tricks to your content creation workflow

5. Who is developing BIM standards? Government Sectors Agencies and Organizations

6. Can’t Find the Standard you Need? At a minimum refer to the Revit Model Content Style Guide –http://seek.autodesk.com/revit.htmhttp://seek.autodesk.com/revit.htm Visit online hosting sites such as Autodesk Seek Refer to best practices demonstrated at RTC, Autodesk University or local user groups

7. Why Aren’t You Using Manufacturer Based Content? Imported, Non-Revit Geometry - No Visibility Options - No Linking of Materials - Effects Project Performance Lack of Meta-Data - No Data? - Improper data/data types Content Providers Lack of Industry Knowledge -Hosting Behaviors, Incorrect Data Types, Incorrect Family Categories etc..

8. Over Modeled Geometry Revit Models are NOT Fabrication Drawings Too Many Parameters or Un-Organized Parameters Scheduling Conflicts Lack of Standardized Parameters Why Aren’t You Using Manufacturer Based Content?

9. Advantages When Using Quality Manufacture Content Time Saving Swap nested annotation symbol to firm standard easily Accurate Data/Geometry Highly Customizable Content Visibility Settings/Graphics Configured to Work Within a Project

10. Revit Family Performance Testing MYTH - Voids use up more file size –Voids use exactly the same file size –Only add file size when voids CUT solid geometry SCENARIO: One solid shape uses 20 KB. Copy the solid and make it a void. Together, they now equal 40 KB. Cut the solid with the void. Family now equals 60 KB. (Average increase factor of 1.5)

11. Imported CAD vs. Native Revit Geometry Many say NO to imported CAD, but for the wrong reasons. –Imported CAD uses LESS file size AND loads faster –Materials CAN be assigned through imported CAD layers. CAD Revit CAD Geometry Project File Size (10,000 1x1x1 boxes) = 5,420 KB Revit Geometry Project File Size (10,000 1x1x1 boxes) = 9,128 KB KB

12. Imported CAD vs. Native Revit Geometry Real reasons:  AutoCAD files are often over modeled/detailed for Revit’s purpose.  Materials not set through traditional method  No flexing  Visibility: all or nothing  Stability

13. Nested Families MYTH - Any nesting beyond 2 levels will kill your family Our test: Structure: Parent Family (288 KB) Level 1 (288 KB) Level 2 (288 KB) Level 3 (288 KB) … Level 8 (288 KB) Testing Variations: Only Geometry Geometry with linked parameters Geometry with types What was Tested: Load times Project file size Project performance observed

14. Nested Families – Project File Size KB

15. Nested Families – Load Times into Project Seconds

16. Things to avoid - ARRAYS ARRAYS Affects load times and responsiveness Seconds

17. Things to avoid - GROUPS GROUPS Affects load times and file size Seconds

18. Things to avoid – 3D Text Seconds

19. Tips and Tricks

20. Exploding Families The problem: difficult to edit stacked geometry The solution: exploding families

21. Hidden Nested Family Geometry The problem: difficult to hide nested families The solution: Set the visibility of nested family geometry to a new yes/no parameter. Then, inside the parent family, map this parameter to the same one you would the ‘Visible’ parameter.

22. Visibility of Voids The problem: Can’t hide void shapes The solution: Move it so it doesn’t intersect

23. Error Messages The problem: Can’t control user selections (other than types) The solution: Output Error Messages –3D Text –Symbolic Lines

24. Clearance Areas Tip: use solid geometry to identify areas that should remain clear of any other geometry in the project. This will enable powerful collision detection Other considerations: –Only visible in 3D –Assign subcategory: Clearance Areas –Symbolic lines to represent it in plan/section views –YES/NO parameter to turn on/off –Depth should default to industry standard

25. Snap-in-place families The problem: Difficulty in assembling products The solution: Make it easy by improving references for Snap-in-place behavior

26. Flipping Connectors The problem: Multiple connectors in a family with options become un- assigned connectors in the project The solution: Create geometry that will host and flip / orient the connector into multiple positions

27. Questions?