1. Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Statewide Freight Study/ Plan Ohio Planning Conference July, 2014

2. Ohio Department of Transportation Statewide Freight Plan Purpose: To understand to the greatest detail possible, how Ohio’s freight infrastructure is being utilized. The study identified and analyzed modal freight volumes, commodities and origins/destinations and trends. Develop a MAP-21 compliant Freight Plan. OTECJuly 2014

3. Ohio Department of Transportation Statewide Freight Plan Why do a Freight Plan?  Transportation is the largest cost (63 percent) of doing business for supply chain operators.  An efficient transportation system allows ease of movement of raw materials into production and finished goods out to the market place.  An efficient system lowers transport costs and makes Ohio more attractive to business & industry ie. Jobs. Transportation is linked to the economy July 2014Planning Conference

4. Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Imports $ 4

5. Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Exports $ 5

6. Ohio Department of Transportation National Freight Tonnage at a Glance

7. Ohio Department of Transportation Planning ConferenceJuly 2014

8. Ohio Department of Transportation Statewide Freight Plan Designed to be included into the States Long Range Transportation Plan Access Ohio 2040  Freight Stakeholders; –Logistics Industry Interviews, roll out to MPO’s, RTPO’s  Freight Analysis –Freight Flows –Economic Trends –Physical Assets  Policies and Strategies –Best Practices and Case Studies  Inclusion into Access Ohio 2040 Planning ConferenceJuly 2014

9. Ohio Department of Transportation Trucking Ohio Truck Freight Analysis

10. Ohio Department of Transportation Truck VMT 1975 - 2010 10 Ohio State Highway System

11. Ohio Department of Transportation Top 10 Commodities Base Year = 2007 Weight (Thousand Tons)Value ($ millions) CommodityNumberPercentCommodityNumberPercent Total936,314.5 Total$1,677,810.1 Base metals78,102.68.34%Motorized vehicles215,941.712.87% Gravel76,157.88.13%Machinery168,953.310.07% Nonmetal min. prods.60,689.86.48%Electronics130,210.37.76% Other foodstuffs60,449.46.46%Base metals110,376.16.58% Waste/scrap59,450.46.35%Plastics/rubber98,217.05.85% Cereal grains53,329.05.70%Mixed freight92,440.05.51% Motorized vehicles36,622.83.91%Textiles/leather92,049.85.49% Natural sands35,034.83.74%Pharmaceuticals78,840.14.70% Plastics/rubber34,122.43.64%Chemical prods.76,983.54.59% Mixed freight30,034.43.21%Other foodstuffs74,049.74.41% 11 Top 10 Ohio Truck Commodities by Weight and Value

12. Ohio Department of Transportation Flow Maps 12 Commodity-Specific Flow Maps: Automotive Parts

13. Ohio Department of Transportation Trucking Issues  Driver Shortage, Hours of Service (HOS) Regulations  Truck Parking  Fuel Cost  Congestion  Truck Size and Weight –Exacerbated by driver shortage and HOS –Need to identify oversize routes and terminals  Highway Funding 13

14. Ohio Department of Transportation Highway Freight Corridors Planning ConferenceJuly 2014

15. Ohio Department of Transportation Rail Freight 15 Ohio Rail Freight Analysis

16. Ohio Department of Transportation Rail System Analysis 16 Rail Freight Traffic Density

17. Ohio Department of Transportation Rail Intermodal 200 100 65 130 50 110 35 40 20 Containers per Year CSX Cleveland100,000 NS Toledo (Airline)65,000 NS Cleveland100,000 CSX Marysville15,000 NS Columbus200,000 CSX Columbus130,000 CSX Marion50,000 CSX Cincinnati40,000 NS Cincinnati (Gest St)110,000 NS Cincinnati (Sharonville)35,000 CSX North Baltimore20,000 17

18. Ohio Department of Transportation Rail Freight Issues  Ohio has a very strong rail freight system  Large amount of public and private investment over the last 10 years, especially in intermodal  Capacity to do more within economic and service constraints –Shipment size –Customer accessibility to rail –Speed and reliability –Intermodal investments, transload capabilities 18

19. Ohio Department of Transportation Rail Issues  Abandonments or underutilized lines –Represents excess capacity, yet the rail corridors may once again be needed  Marginal economics of some short line operators; lack of traffic to reinvest  Deficient infrastructure (especially short lines) such as inability to handle 286k pound cars; bridge deficiencies 19  New or expanding markets –Shale oil and gas –Agriculture export –Heavy cargo loads

20. Ohio Department of Transportation 20 Ohio Ports

21. Ohio Department of Transportation 21 LAKE ERIE PORTS

22. Ohio Department of Transportation Port Capabilities 22

23. Ohio Department of Transportation Lake Ports  New cargo evaluation –Short sea shipping Port of Cleveland Container Service to Europe Increased ship building & repair capabilities –Shale oil and gas Inbound materials to Ohio—frac sand, pipe, equipment Outbound petroleum distribution networks –Containerized vessel feeder service  Mode shift analysis –Freight moving by truck or rail that fits a water profile 23

24. Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio River Ports 24 Ohio River Terminals

25. Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio River Terminals 25 Ohio River Terminal Clusters

26. Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio River Profile  Existing barges primarily carry bulk cargo: coal, iron ore, stone, chemicals –Heavy-lift capabilities and lack of multi- jurisdictional permitting are a big plus for over dimensional & weight loads –Potential for general cargo moves  Over 95% of Ohio River terminals are privately-owned –Most of those have single-use, e.g., a coal terminal operated by an electric generating plant –Identified approximately 24 private terminals which could handle cargo for any customer –Of these24 terminals, about 10 handle “general cargo,” such as bagged products, semi-finished steel, machinery, or heavy-lift cargo 26

27. Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio River  Lock and dam maintenance, the heart of the inland waterway system –47% functional obsolescent, growing to 80% by 2020 –20 cent per gallon user fee covers half the cost of lock and dam maintenance (HMT), with other half from congressional appropriations –WRRDA Bill increased HMT spending, increased maintenance  Slower speeds; but heavy lift, less fuel usage and scheduled service of barge transport compared to competing modes –Environmentally friendly  Marine Highway designations (M-70/29, M90) 27

28. Ohio Department of Transportation 28 Air Freight

29. Ohio Department of Transportation Air Freight  Air cargo market faces stiff competition –Among other air carriers, and –Trucks, container ships, and rail cars  Air cargo primarily moves by two methods –Dedicated cargo aircraft –In the belly of passenger planes  What is impacting air cargo –Fuel Prices – Passenger and freight carriers –Declining Availability of Belly Space on Domestic Carriers – A small percentage of air cargo is carried on domestic passenger aircraft in the US.  Proximity to air cargo is essential for business & industry –Air service is the most expensive, but also the fastest for just in time delivery’s to keep production schedules moving July 2014Planning Conference 2014

30. Ohio Department of Transportation Next Steps Ohio’s MAP-21 compliant Statewide Freight Plan –Section 1118 Performance measures, national goals –Education and outreach with MPO’s, RTPO’s, Stakeholders and our modal Partners –Advancing initiatives ie. Operations plan, ITS, PFN, STS, OS/OW corridors and others Planning Conf. 2014July 2014

31. Ohio Department of Transportation Ohio Planning ConferenceJuly 2014

32. Ohio Department of Transportation Mark Locker, AICP Statewide Planning & Research Maritime Freight Mobility & Logistics Ohio Department of Transportation (614) 466-2347 Mark.Locker@dot.state.oh.us