1. Review Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Supattra Tribuddharat
13/10/48

2. Ventricular system CSF production 0.2-0.35 ml/min; total volume 120 ml
lateral ventricle  foramen of Monro third ventricle, cerebral aqueduct
fourth ventricle foramina of Luschka and Magendie subarachnoid space 
arachnoid granulations dural sinus  venous drainage.

3. Hydrocephalus
A disturbance of formation, flow, or absorption of CSF  an increase in volume in CNS
Communicating / non Communicating
(full communication between ventricles and subarachnoid space)
Cerebral atrophy and focal destructive lesions vacant space filled with CSF
(hydrocephalus ex vacuo)

4. Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH)
First described in 1965 by Hakim and Adams
Clinical triad of symtoms :
- gait disturbance
- dementia
- incontinence
Image: communicating hydrocephalus
Potenially reversible by shunting: symptoms <2y

5. Etiology of NPH
Idiopathic : ~50%,elderly > 60 y, worse response to shunting (30–50%)
Secondary : ~50%, younger age, better response to shunting (50–70%)
- head injury
- subarachnoid haemorrhage
- meningitis
- neurosurgery
Rare disease, account for 0.4% of cases of dementia

6. Etiology of idiopathic NPH
Combination of mechanisms > a single cause
Decreased CSF resorption at arachnoidal villi or granulations  increases transmantle pressure (CSF pressure within ventricles > in subarachnoid space)  ventricular enlargement
Short-lasting CSF pulsations (B waves) periodically apply pressure to the ventricular walls and have a water-hammer effect that enlarges the ventricles
transmantle pressure (ie, difference in pressure between ventricles and subarachnoid space)

7. Anatomy Enlarged third ventricle
Dilation of the occipital, frontal, and temporal horns of the lateral ventricles.
Presumably, the periventricular white matter is stretched and dysfunctional as a result of inadequate perfusion, without actually being infarcted

8. Clinical features
Considerable variation in nature, severity, and course of progression
Gradually progressive disorder
Gait disturbance : the most readily recognized feature
Cognitive disturbances : not occur in all patients
Signs and symptoms of INPH are typically bilateral

9. Gait disorder An initial manifestation of NPH
Mechanisms: enlargement of the ventricles
1. compression motor neuron fibers passing through corona radiata (an early hypothesis; pyramidal tract: not supported by recent study)
2. a disorder of subcortical motor control
with progression of extensive subcortical white matter changes, pyramidal tract involvement may become more likely

10. described as “apractic,” “bradykinetic,” “glue-footed,” “magnetic,” “parkinsonian,”
“short-stepped,” and “shuffling.”
Bradykinetic, broad-based, and shuffling
Mimics PD: start hesitation, difficulty turning, freezing
Increased tone and with brisk tendon reflexes in the lower limb
Plantar responses may be flexor or extensor, unilaterally or bilateral

11. Differentiate NPH from PD:
May occur but less commonly : rigidity, tremor, and slowing of rapid, alternating movements
Does not respond significantly to carbidopa/levodopa
No true ataxia or weakness, described as gait apraxia.
Parkinsonian symptoms in INPH : abnormal pulsatile CSF flow affecting the substantia substantia nigra and/or striatum,

12. Dementia Mental deterioration is frequently mild and subcortical
Memory problems, poor attention, bradyphreni and slowing of information processing
It progresses less rapidly than the dementia of Alzheimer disease

13. Incontinence Usually urinary but may be fecal.
Increased frequency and urgency may be seen in early stages ; progression to frank urinary incontinence with disease progression.
Results from disruption of periventricular pathways to the sacral bladder center  decreased inhibition of bladder contractions and  instability of bladder detrusors
more advanced stages : indifference to the episodes of incontinence, is associated with frontal executive dysfunction.

14. Unexpected manifestration
Papilledema
Seizure
headache

15. Brain Imaging
MRI or CT must be performed to assess ventricular size and to rule out ventricular obstruction.
Either CT or MRI can document noncommunicating ventriculomegaly sufficient to satisfy the brain imaging requirements for routine diagnosis of INPH.

16. - Ventricular enlargement out of proportion to sulcal atrophy
CT scan or MRI
- Ventricular enlargement out of proportion to sulcal atrophy
- Prominent periventricular hyperintensity (transependymal flow of CSF)
- Prominent flow void in the aqueduct and third ventricle, the so-called “jet sign,” (presents as a dark aqueduct and third ventricle on a T2-weighted image where remainder of CSF is bright)
Thinning and elevation of corpus callosum on sagittal images
Rounding of frontal horns
May have hyponatremia (SIADH)
Hyponatremia presumably due to pressure on the hypothalamus that resulted in a syndrome of inappropriate secretion of antidiuretic hormone antidiuretic hormone antidiuretic hormone

17. a rounded frontal horn The arrow points to transependymal flow.
T2-weighted MRI showing dilatation of ventricles out of proportion to sulcal atrophy

18. Measurement of CSF-OP Normal CSF-OP averages 122 ±34mmH2O
INPH, CSF-OP averages 150 ±45 mmH2O
( mm H2O)
Transient high pressures (“B waves”) are detectable during prolonged intraventricular monitoring in adults with symptomatic INPH
OP is elevated > 18 mm Hg indicate secondary or noncommunicating hydrocephalus than INPH

19. DIAGNOSING IDIOPATHIC NPH
Require clinical history, physical examination, and brain imaging
Diagnosis of INPH is complicated
Resemble, or occur in combination with, various disorders that are prevalent in the elderly, such as CVD, neurodegenerative disorders (e.g., AD, PD, LBD), primary urological disorders, spinal stenosis, and other conditions.
May be useful to classify INPH into “probable,” “possible,” and “unlikely” categories,

24. PROGNOSTIC TESTS FOR PREOPERATIVE ASSESSMENT OF INPH
1. CSF Removal via High-volume “Tap Test”
Remove large volumes of CSF (40–50 ml)
An objective improvement in gait
Complications : ± headaches
62% sensitivity , 33% specificity
Good PPV for shunt response INPH
Specificity is low, many patients who might benefit from shunting will be missed
Therefore, INPH candidates not be excluded on the basis of a negative tap test.

25. 2. CSF Ro (outflow resistance)
A pump introduces CSF or saline 4ml at a rate 1ml/sec through a needle placed in the lumbar subarachnoid space
Complications: headaches and meningismus
Sensitivity 46%, specificity87%
CSF Ro may be helpful in increasing prognostic accuracy for identifying SRINPH when tap test results are negative

26. 3. ELD Test (external lumbar drainage)
Draining 10 ml CSF/ hour for 72 hrs (total, 720 ml)
Complications: bacterial meningitis and root irrigation
more patients who do not improve with CSF tap test will show improvement with prolonged drainage and benefit from shunting
The PPV is high, 80 to 100%,
However, hospital admission is required.
Reported complication rates with ELD are generally low but may be significant in terms of added

28. Treatment Medication Surgical Care:
: No definitive evidence exists that medication can successfully treat NPH.
Surgical Care:
:Surgical CSF shunting remains the main treatment modality.

29. No randomized prospective clinical trials were conducted comparing different measures or protocols of shunt outcome assessment.
no validated, universally accepted scale for assessment of treated or untreated INPH outcome.
Shunt outcome can be based on the documentation of either the clinical impairment, improvement after treatment, or both. Grading of either the functional status or the clinical criteria of gait, incontinence, and dementia

32. Patients with a good response to the above procedure
are candidates for ventriculoperitoneal or
ventriculoatrial shunting.
Best results :- patients who have no adverse risk factors; responded favorably to a large-volume LP; definite evidence of dementia and ataxia, CT scan or MRI evidence of chronic hydrocephalus,
- a normal CSF at lumbar puncture.
Some evidence indicates that patients with gait disturbance, mild or no incontinence, and mild dementia fare best among shunt surgery patients.

33. Thank you

35. a baseline neuropsychological evaluation and a timed walking test.
undergo a lumbar puncture with removal of approximately 50 cc of CSF. The above evaluations are repeated 3 hours later.
A clear-cut improvement in mental status and/or gait predicts a favorable response to shunt surgery.
Improvement in gait may be seen in the form of reduced time to walk a fixed distance, reduced gait apraxia, or reduced freezing of gait.
Reduction in bladder hyperactivity also may be a sign of good outcome from shunting. Occasionally, improvement may be delayed and appear 1-2 days after the large-volume lumbar punctures.
When clinical suspicion is high and the patient is a good candidate for surgery, repeated lumbar punctures are indicated over the next 1-2 days.
Some clinicians use an indwelling CSF catheter in lieu of repeated lumbar punctures. This method carries a higher risk of meningeal infection but may allow for a more accurate prognosis.