Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

]po[ Rollout Methodology Frank Bergmann (cc) Except where otherwise noted, content on this slide is licensed under a Creative.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "]po[ Rollout Methodology Frank Bergmann (cc) Except where otherwise noted, content on this slide is licensed under a Creative."— Presentation transcript:

1 ]po[ Rollout Methodology Frank Bergmann frank.bergmann@project-open.com (cc) Except where otherwise noted, content on this slide is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 LicensenotedCreative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

2  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 2 Contents  Overview – Schematic Planning – Implementation Steps Overview – ]po[ Project Definition Check points – ]po[ Go-Live Check Points – ]po[ Operations Check Points  ]po[ Implementation Steps – Definition Phase – Extensions Phase – Installation Phase – Training Phase – Go-Live Phase – After Go-Live Phase  ]po[ Rollout Options – „Vertical“ Rollout – „Horizontal“ Rollout – Typical Rollout 1 – Test Operations – Typical Rollout 2 – Accounting Integration – Typical Rollout 3 – Workflow Rollout – Typical Rollout 4 – Involve Other PMs – Typical Rollout 5 – Further Options

3  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 3 Project Overview

4  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 4 Schematic Planning Defi- nition Extension Development Training Kickoff Go-Live Support Gap Analysis Configuration Requirements Extension Requirements Data Import Requirements Base Inst. Legacy Data Import Configu- ration For medium sized companies Go-Live Normal Support Train ing

5  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 5 ]po[ Implementation Steps After Go-LiveDefinitionTrainingInstallationGo-Live Scope & Application Workshop Design Workshop Permission Configuration Master Data Import SysAdmin Training Accountant Training Project Managers Training Server Installation Category Configuration Basic Configuration Milestone Go-Live Setting Live „Hand Holding“ Support Contract Extensions Testing & Completion SQL & Application Design HTML Mockup Development (optional) Prototype Documentat., Training Mat. After Go-Live Training GUI Configuration Sign-off Feature Freeze

6  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 6 Successfu l installatio n Rollout Objectives Overview Improved processes Improved process visibility Users don’t feel threatened by the system Enough slack time for training User buy-In No major issues with the system Sound support User take advantage of system capabilities Goals Base Rollout Processes Users perceive a familiar environment Stable and well configured system Legacy data migration Sound and specific reports Clean data in the system Improved profit margin Clean instruction s to users Time Progress

7  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 7 Key Terms for a Successful Rollout  Change-Management – Psychological process describing how person move on from an existing situation (comfort zone) to a new situation. – All system users and some stakeholders need to go through this process – Reference: Ross-Kanter  “Taking Ownership” – In some projects, the supposed users reject to use the system – Rejecting ownership is frequently related to bad data in the system that the user can’t trust. – A user starts “taking ownership” when he or she starts to add or modify data.  Buy-In – Describes the attitude of stakeholders towards the system and the project team – Based on

8  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 8 ]po[ Project Definition  The decision “Adapt ]po[ or adapt the company” is the single most important factor to determine the project cost and implementation speed.  The “Strong Key User” is the most important factor in a project’s success. A strong Key User is somebody with detailed knowledge of all company processes and has some technology skills, quickly understanding the logic of a software.  The outcome of the Project Definition is used in the following phases, so it is important to document the decisions here.

9  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 9 ]po[ Implementation and Go-Live  Each of the factors below need to be covered about 80% in order to allow a successful “go-live”. Small modifications (20%) are usually fine after the go-live if expectations are managed accordingly.  The key for a successful go- live is the “Training Manual” that explains how users should use ]po[. Writing this manual can take 5-10 net days of work..

10  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 10 ]po[ Operations  The #1 issue after the go-live is the quality of data in the system. Please make sure that user can “trust” the data inside the system and know who entered these data, so that complaints can be converted in improvements.  The key for successful long-term ]po[ operations is a Support Team that is capable of modifying/ extending ]po[. This team can be either in-house with 3rd level support from ]po[ (recommended) of outsourced.  System Admin is usually not an issue anymore after the go-live. But please make sure to test recovery operations every 2-3 month.

11  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 11 Data “Hygiene”

12  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 12 “Data Hygiene” Intro  “Clean” data is necessary for invoicing, financial controlling and any high-level reporting.  Data “pollution” can happen because of various factors: – Insufficient definition on how data should be entered – Lack of user training – Time pressure may lead to a conflict between a user’s performance evaluation and clean data entry – Lack of control to detect “polluted” data in the system – Lack of power to force users to enter clean data “An ERP system is mostly about trust: Users who pull out data at one end have to trust the users who entered data at the other end. This is the true challenge.” From a posting in [erp-select]

13  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 13 “Data Hygiene” Maturity Roadmap 1.Incomplete Production Data: The parallel use of other systems or Excel sheets leads to the situation that not all “production data” (projects etc.) are available in the system. 2.Inconsistencies in Core Data: Once all “production data” are available in the system, there may still be coarse inconsistencies in projects and financial, leading to incomplete invoicing and meaningless financial controlling results. 3.Inconsistencies in Non-Core Data: Once projects and finance are OK, there may still be inconsistencies in auxiliary data such as task definitions, price lists, invoice “unit of measure”, etc. 4.Consistent Data in all Major Processes: Once all data are captured consistently, you can correlate the organization’s operational with financial performance for all major processes and define performance indicators.

14  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 14 “Data Hygiene” Feedback Loops  Data Hygiene is an iterative learning process.  Example Processes: – Projects (name, start & end dates, hierarchy) – Customer information for CRM – Provider information for provider mgmt. – Invoicing (produce quotes and invoices for each project). – Customer price lists – Provider price lists – Provider Billing (produce purchase orders and bills for providers) – Project planning (% assignation of users to projects) – Timesheet information – Absences and vacation – Quality reports and evaluations – Skill database – Query & issue management via forum – …  For each process you need to define: – The manager responsible for data hygiene – Norms to define “clean data” – The reports (or other control mechanisms) to extract information – The users responsible to enter/ correct data – The “feedback mechanism” and its escalation levels Information Producer Information Consumer/ Manager ]po[ Information Producer Report Feedback Loop

15  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 15 Benefits from “Data Hygiene”  ]po[ allows you to extract a wealth of high-level information if your data are entered correctly. Examples include: – Profit & Loss per project – Profit & Loss per customer over time – Profit & Loss per sales rep or project manager – Quality of delivered work vs. cost of service – … (please see the “Indicators” section for a range or performance indicators).

16  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 16 Detailed Project Phase Description

17  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 17 Definition Phase  Customer’s Senior Management learns about the application and identifies the ]po[ modules to be implemented.  Identification of extension development necessities.  Senior Management or Key Users specify configuration and customization necessities.  Scoping and functional requirement definition for extension development. Work PackageObjectiveDeliverables  Scope of project  Input for first cost estimate  Decision structure  Configuration requirements  Extension requirements  Input for detailed quote Scope & Application Workshop Design Workshop

18  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 18 Extensions Phase  Build a functional “mockup” using static HTML pages based on input from the “Design Workshop”.  Mockup confirmation in a functional design workshop and freeze of specifications.  Define how extensions should relate to existing ]po[ modules.  Design a SQL data model.  Implement the specified extensions.  Presentation of a prototype to the customer.  Completion of the prototype functionality and testing in the customer’s context.  Documentation of the extensions and development / adaptation of training material.  Extensions sign-off. Work PackageObjectiveDeliverables  HTML mockup  Functional specifications  Reutilization Concept  Data Model  Working code  Confirmation of functionality  Working system  Documentation & training material  Working extensions Testing & Completion SQL & Application Design HTML Mockup Development Prototype Documentat., Training Mat. Sign-off Feature Freeze

19  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 19 Installation Phase  Install the ]po[ application on a production server and (optionally) on a development/test server. Security configuration.  Configuration of Admin / Parameters section according to customer requirements.  Setup of user profiles and user profile privileges according.  Adapt ]po[ categories (project types, customer types, …) to the specific business.  Adapt GUI colors and font styles to the customer’s corporate design (optional).  Create ]po[ customers, providers, customer contacts, freelancers, employees and prices from existing data. Work PackageObjectiveDeliverables  Installed applications  Working application  Secure application  Adapted application  Attractive application  Usable application Permission Configuration Master Data Import Server Installation GUI Configuration Basic Configuration Category Configuration

20  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 20 Training Phase  Allow PMs to efficiently use the “Translation Workflow”, “File Storage” and “Forum” modules.  Allow accountants to efficiently use the “Translation Invoices” and “Freelance Invoices” (optional) modules.  Enable the Sysadmin to perform backup, restore and recovery operations. Work PackageObjectiveDeliverables  Successful training SysAdmin Training Accountant Training Project Managers Training

21  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 21 Go-Live Phase  Obtain technical OK to go-Live.  Obtain user’s OK to go-live.  Live setting of the application. Final transfer of data from the legacy to the new system (optional). Work PackageObjectiveDeliverables  Decision to go-live  Operational new system Milestone Go-Live Setting Live

22  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 22 Support Contract After Go-Live  Presence of implementation team members during the first days after going live in order to deal with questions and issues.  Training to deal with unanticipated or unresolved questions after the go-live.  Ongoing support. Work PackageObjectiveDeliverables  Successful completion of the first project cycles  All users are capable of using the system  A stable and updated system „Hand Holding“ After Go-Live Training

23  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 23 ]po[ Implementation Phases After Go-LiveDefinitionTrainingInstallationGo-Live Scope & Application Workshop Design Workshop Permission Configuration Master Data Import SysAdmin Training Accountant Training Project Managers Training Server Installation Category Configuration Basic Configuration Milestone Go-Live Setting Live „Hand Holding“ Support Contract Extensions Testing & Completion SQL & Application Design HTML Mockup Development (optional) Prototype Documentat., Training Mat. After Go-Live Training GUI Configuration Sign-off Feature Freeze

24  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 24 Change Management Strategies

25  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 25 ]po[ Rollout Options Man. Dir. Sales Manager Operations Manager Finance PM 1PM 3PM 2PM 4 CRM PM Workflow Accounting Freelance -DB Filestorage Customer 1 Freelance 1 Freelance 2 Resource Manager Customer 2 Quality-DB... Vertical Rollout Option: One project manager starts using the system, possibly only for a limited number of customers Horizontal Rollout Option: A single process (PM, CRM, filestorage,...) is being used by all PMs Processes

26  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 26 „Vertical“ Rollout Pros  Limited Risk: A single project manager „tests“ the functionality  Skill Management: The initial PM will probably be interested in systems & IT  The initial PM can later provide training & support to the other PMs Cons  Integration Difficulties: This approach can be difficult if ]po[ needs to be integrated with existing systems. Summary  „Vertical“ is the best option for smaller companies and companies without PM systems.

27  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 27 „Horizontal“ Rollout Pros  Reduces Integration Difficulties: „Big Bang“ rollout is cheaper if there are existing systems that would have to run in parallel otherwise.  No duplicated training Cons  Higher Risk: Initial implementation difficulties have bigger impact on the company Summary  „Horizontal“ is the best option for complex rollouts in larger companies in order to avoid high integration costs with existing systems.  „Horizontal“ may be combined with a „vertical“ test phase.

28  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 28 Typical Rollout (1) Man. Dir. Sales Manager Operations Manager Finance PM 1PM 3PM 2PM 4 Customer 1 Freelance 1 Freelance 2 Resource Manager Customer 2 Start with the most IT- savvy PM. He or she will later provide training to the other PMs Start with project management and the freelance-DB. You will need to setup a few customers and freelancers in order to get started. Test Operations CRM PM Workflow Accounting Freelance -DB Filestorage Quality-DB... Processes

29  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 29 Typical Rollout (2) Man. Dir. Sales Manager Operations Manager Finance PM 1PM 3PM 2PM 4 Customer 1 Freelance 1 Freelance 2 Resource Manager Customer 2 Integrate with your financial backend. Train your ccountant(s) to import information from ]po[ and how to track bills & invoices from within the system. Accounting Integration CRM PM Workflow Accounting Freelance -DB Filestorage Quality-DB... Processes

30  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 30 Typical Rollout (3) Man. Dir. Sales Manager Operations Manager Finance PM 1PM 3PM 2PM 4 Customer 1 Freelance 1 Freelance 2 Resource Manager Customer 2 Now one option is to start using the translation workflow and to involve the first freelancers in the process. However, this is not a necessary step. Workflow Rollout CRM PM Workflow Accounting Freelance -DB Filestorage Quality-DB... Processes

31  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 31 Typical Rollout (4) Man. Dir. Sales Manager Operations Manager Finance PM 1PM 3PM 2PM 4 Customer 1 Freelance 1 Freelance 2 Resource Manager Customer 2 Now (some 1-3 month after starting with the first PM) your company is typically ready to rollout ]po[ for the other PMs. Involve other PMs CRM PM Workflow Accounting Freelance -DB Filestorage Quality-DB... Processes

32  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 32 Typical Rollout (5) Man. Dir. Sales Manager Operations Manager Finance PM 1PM 3PM 2PM 4 Customer 1 Freelance 1 Freelance 2 Resource Manager Customer 2 After this point there are several options on how to proceed. However, your company will have made a lot of progress understanding the system, allowing you to take an informed decision. Further Options CRM PM Workflow Accounting Freelance -DB Filestorage Quality-DB... Processes

33  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 33 Two-Week Rapid Rollout

34  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 34 Week 1Week 2 Two-Week Rapid Rollout Go-Live "Hand-Holding" Gap Analysis Configuration Requirements Extension Requirements Data Import Requirements Base Inst. Configu- ration Getting ]po[ running in two condensed weeks Go-Live Support (Contract) Training on the configured system. Last check with PMs if everything OK. Legcy Data Import Specs Preconditions Fix Issues, clarify processes Training for Accounting, Sales,... The Go-Live Condition: All #1 prios need to be OK in order to go-live Week 2 is to fix prio #2 issues and questions, such as incomplete master data or process variants Prio #3 issues can be fixed remotely

35  ]project-opem[ 2008, Rollout Methodology / Frank Bergmann / 35 End Frank Bergmann frank.bergmann@project-open.com www.project-open.com


Download ppt "]po[ Rollout Methodology Frank Bergmann (cc) Except where otherwise noted, content on this slide is licensed under a Creative."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google